Mini 715: Legends of Literature Mafia (Over)

[roflcopter]

Scum could be looking for character(s) from certain books, etc.

unvote, vote: carncarn

that implies some sort of inside knowledge about scum mechanics

[SlySly]

that implies some sort of inside knowledge about scum mechanics

This implies that you have no knowledge of scum tactics. According to your signature, you have been scum enough times to have that inside knowledge.

vote:rolfcopter

[SlySly]

Oh yeah. Bah! Humbug!

[Caboose]

that implies some sort of inside knowledge about scum mechanics

This implies that you have no knowledge of scum tactics. According to your signature, you have been scum enough times to have that inside knowledge.

vote:rolfcopter

Do what? rofl has been scum in different games. He's saying that CC looks like he has inside knowledge of

this

game's scum mechanics.
The chainsaw defense of CC is noted.

Unvote
Vote: SlySly

For voting for rofl for a stupid reason and chainsaw defending CC at the same time.

[roflcopter]

what caboose said.

and i said scum

mechanics

, not scum tactics, so thanks for twisting my words.

fos: slysly

[vaquero]

Mod: Do we get to know farside's role?

Er... yeah I guess I read "Comrade Napoleon, Miller" as some sort of full name, rather than the role 'miller'. Clearly I was too tired when I read that post.

[CarnCarn]

Scum could be looking for character(s) from certain books, etc.

unvote, vote: carncarn

that implies some sort of inside knowledge about scum mechanics

No inside knowledge, just standard precautions.

[Caboose]

Oh yeah. Bah! Humbug!

Oh, yeah, and nice attempt at faking a PR.

[SlySly]

Oh yeah. Bah! Humbug!

Oh, yeah, and nice attempt at faking a PR.

What is a PR?

[SlySly]

that implies some sort of inside knowledge about scum mechanics

He's saying that CC looks like he has inside knowledge of

this

game's scum mechanics.

Where does he specify this game? I think that is an assumption on your part. I was not defending CC, maybe you are trying to defend rofl.

FOS:Caboose

rolfcopter, you are right, I should have said mechanics.

[icemanE]

I don't think the mass flavor claim would do us any good right now. It's so broad and the fake claim options are endless... the only way it would work out is if we were all characters from the same book, and A. Napoleon isn't in mine, + B. I can only name two other characters in my novel, off the top of my head, and I've read it, so I doubt that's the case.

Otherwise, I don't really see a ton of merit in the case on rolfcopter. He has a potentially valid point - this is a themed game, after all.

[Tenchi]

Oh yeah. Bah! Humbug!

Oh, yeah, and nice attempt at faking a PR.

What is a PR?

^ What he said.

Will reread in 24 hours.

[icemanE]

PR = power role

[roflcopter]

actually in this case i think pr = post restriction

[Tenchi]

Two things:

1. CC's point on "Scum could be looking for characters from certain books, etc. is I think a valid opinion. This is a themed game after all. I don't think it was scummy to bring it up. It's only fair.

FoS: roflcopter

for his vote on CC re Post 25. (Edit: ERGH what icemanE said.)
2. Caboose: What is a chainsaw defense?
3. I personally don't mind a massclaim, but I'm wary. Again, because of CC's point.

[Tenchi]

Ergh THREE THINGS.

[vaquero]

Now, I wouldn't mind a massclaim, but I'm not convinced it would do us any good. I suppose then we would know if a person was acting strange because of their character, though I think this could just as easily serve as cover for a mafia member to act strange or suspicious.

[roflcopter]

i didn't suggest we massclaim or claim characters, just claim what books we come from

[Caboose]

Oh yeah. Bah! Humbug!

Oh, yeah, and nice attempt at faking a PR.

What is a PR?

PR = Post restriction, your "Bah! Humbug!"

Where does he specify this game? I think that is an assumption on your part. I was not defending CC, maybe you are trying to defend rofl.

FOS:Caboose

rolfcopter, you are right, I should have said mechanics.

So you FoS me because I can read? LoL. It was pretty clear what rofl meant in his post.

Chainsaw defense = defending someone by attacking that person's attacker. Usually the chainsaw defender uses invalid reasons in his/her vote.

SS attacked rofl for attacking CC. Add in the fact that SS's reason for a rofl vote is complete crap and we have scum.

Look at SS's post:

This implies that you have no knowledge of scum tactics. According to your signature, you have been scum enough times to have that inside knowledge.

vote:rolfcopter

First off, he completely misrepresented what rofl said. rofl was talking about CC having knowledge of scum mechanics

in this particular theme

game and SS turns that into a generalization of scum mechanics overall, which was clearly not rofl's intent.
Second off, he votes rofl for a really stupid reason. He pretty much pulls reasons out of his rear end and manages to spin everything that rofl like it's a scumtell when it's clearly not.

[icemanE]

actually in this case i think pr = post restriction

o.

[CarnCarn]

i didn't suggest we massclaim or claim characters, just claim what books we come from

So, far people have been indifferent/slightly reluctant about it. In case it's not clear, let me just say that I am definately opposed to this idea.

[SlySly]

PR = Post restriction, your "Bah! Humbug!"

ROFLMFAO @ You and your assumptions. Does it really look like I have a post restriction or that I am trying to act like I do? If you think the meaning of my "Bah! Humbug!" post was to fake a post restriction, go right on with your bad self assuming something that is TOTALLY inaccurate.

So you FoS me because I can read? LoL. It was pretty clear what rofl meant in his post.

In other words, you can't point out where he specified "this" game.

[Caboose]

ROFLMFAO @ You and your assumptions. Does it really look like I have a post restriction or that I am trying to act like I do? If you think the meaning of my "Bah! Humbug!" post was to fake a post restriction, go right on with your bad self assuming something that is TOTALLY inaccurate.

So, you're already character claiming?
Why?

In other words, you can't point out where he specified "this" game.

Read rofl's post. He said "scum mechanics." Mechanics in

theme

games vary from game to game.
Did rofl really need to sit and type out "it seems like he knows the scum mechanics in this game at this point in time right here right now" to make himself clear?

[SlySly]

So, you're already character claiming?

Can you post without making an assumption?

Did rofl really need to sit and type out "it seems like he knows the scum mechanics in this game at this point in time right here right now" to make himself clear?

I find it hilarious that you have to paraphrase to make your point. That just proves mine.

[Caboose]

Can you post without making an assumption?

SS, you can't read anybody's posts literally in mafia, you have to make inferences ("assumptions" as you like to call them).
Why did you make this post?

Oh yeah. Bah! Humbug!

I find it hilarious that you have to paraphrase to make your point. That just proves mine.

*sigh*
What is your "case" on rofl if that isn't it?
I don't think it exists.