In post 358, T3 wrote:Why did you dislike it at first and then stopped disliking it?
I am also often self-absorbed and think that other players should have more interest in and reaction to the things that I say.
In post 360, gob wrote:
We’re 100% never fading STD today.
camelCasedSnivy, Shirou, Ydrasse, Alisae, Prism
this probably has scum on back end (alisae, prism)
What a horrible entry post. I don't think me at the bottom is a big deal. Whiteknighting Dragons [for what I assume] because his posting is very town is absolutely wild and an impossible conclusion to reach. Alisae at the bottom is also interesting and probably begs elaboration.
VOTE: gob
That is not my reasoning though? I never said their posting was towny lol.
I said because they got voted so quickly with no resistance theyre almost certainly not scum.
gob: Thank you for answering. That reasoning seems still bad but at least plausible. Waiting on the answer to my second question.
Spoiler: The following is not a commentary on the read quality or your alignment.
While your explanation is clarifying and the thoughts fit the post in retrospect, you claim to have said the reasoning in your original post. I don't think anyone would agree. Taking the full trip through your head is difficult in the absence of explanation.
5 of the 6 voters and a mention of "back end" make the scumread source (late wagoners) difficult to reliably infer but at least possible. In contrast, it is impossible to infer why you thought Dragons was town, and my assumption was noted in brackets because that is the most natural reading/explanation.
You will continue to struggle to achieve that goal without explaining why you feel that way.
Personally, I'm confused as to why you personally would think point 2, because the only time you watched me play scum I strongarmed all 4 eliminations in the game, but I will leave it to others.
In post 380, Prism wrote:
gob: Thank you for answering. That reasoning seems still bad but at least plausible. Waiting on the answer to my second question.
Spoiler: The following is not a commentary on the read quality or your alignment.
While your explanation is clarifying and the thoughts fit the post in retrospect, you claim to have said the reasoning in your original post. I don't think anyone would agree. Taking the full trip through your head is difficult in the absence of explanation.
5 of the 6 voters and a mention of "back end" make the scumread source (late wagoners) difficult to reliably infer but at least possible. In contrast, it is impossible to infer why you thought Dragons was town, and my assumption was noted in brackets because that is the most natural reading/explanation.
In post 386, Prism wrote:
I am satisfied voting you without doing more work on your behalf. If you convince me you are town another way, I will gladly move.
Okay that’s cool. i am not in the mood for stupid plays anyway.
In post 358, T3 wrote:Why did you dislike it at first and then stopped disliking it?
I am also often self-absorbed and think that other players should have more interest in and reaction to the things that I say.
In post 360, gob wrote:
We’re 100% never fading STD today.
camelCasedSnivy, Shirou, Ydrasse, Alisae, Prism
this probably has scum on back end (alisae, prism)
What a horrible entry post. I don't think me at the bottom is a big deal. Whiteknighting Dragons [for what I assume] because his posting is very town is absolutely wild and an impossible conclusion to reach. Alisae at the bottom is also interesting and probably begs elaboration.
VOTE: gob
That is not my reasoning though? I never said their posting was towny lol.
I said because they got voted so quickly with no resistance theyre almost certainly not scum.
This explanation isn't that bad but I still think gob is scum on balance.
In post 384, gob wrote:
Yea prism is scummy but alisae is scummier
your reasoning for clearing std is terrible and is built on a flawed structure.
Just because someone got wagoned quickly doesn't mean that they're town. Not to mention you're also removing context.
from my pov before I joined it was just 3 votes. I liked the people who were voting, it seemed natural to me, and also wagons in the early game are a good thing as they force people to create stances. I don't rly have anything to lose from making that vote. If anything it's interesting if a hammer on STD actually does happen
In 2010, when I was still a very hungry caterpillar at the ripe age of 13, I experimented with the "third on the wagon" rule to great success in 9p games. I do think that heuristic was a touch more reliable, but we all start somewhere.
In post 398, Prism wrote:
In 2010, when I was still a very hungry caterpillar at the ripe age of 13, I experimented with the "third on the wagon" rule to great success in 9p games. I do think that heuristic was a touch more reliable, but we all start somewhere.
