What do you mean "They’re pushing me so unbiased evaluation is ongoing"?
And what do you think of bianco/Snivy interaction?
My subconscious reaction to being pushed is always going to be “that’s scummy” but town can have wrong pushes so I’m still deciding if it’s coming from scum or wrong town.
I think snivy is an awkward kind of player in the sense that I don’t tend to see them follow logical processes and that’s a tough playstyle for me to get my head around. Similar to enchant. Just their style of play makes for awakward interactions so I didn’t take a ton away from it.
I’ll say like, I played with them as town in datisis university and mislimmed them, and against them as scum in…..I forgot the name of it, but set them up for mislim, so.
In post 237, Aisa wrote:
VOTE: yessiree
Serious vote. I don't really like his pushes on either KittyTacky or RCEnigma.
In post 195, yessiree wrote:
i would buy that if it was like page 2 or 3, even then i still disagree with that assessment
i dont like ur implication that people posted nothing but fluff for the past 8 pages
I personally don't really have any well-developed reads yet. I know that with the way I play I'm likely to change my mind later so sometimes on page 10 it's just easier not to talk about how I think not_mafia is towny because he posted twice in a row (not a real read).
this wasn't a push so much as an attempt to sort RCE, out of respect for his scum game (he's a slippery weasel, ask Aureal ).
If i wanted to push him I would've cased him instead of trying to have a dialog, but i feel RCE isn't interested in having it - he is good at anticipating pushes on him and defusing it beforehand (fitting his scum meta)
this is also not real reason, explained here 219
In post 195, yessiree wrote:
i would buy that if it was like page 2 or 3, even then i still disagree with that assessment
i dont like ur implication that people posted nothing but fluff for the past 8 pages
Not what I said. I said I didn’t find any of it town indicative.
echoing DE's sentiment
it seems like you're more interested in getting bogged down with "I said this, I didn't say that" arguments, than to have dialog that's more useful in helping to read you better
I don't like how in the first post yessiree says
implication
(which, well, implies it's not something that RCE said but an inference that yessiree is trying to draw), but when RCE tries to correct what he meant it becomes "now you're getting bogged down in meaningless arguments". I think corrections like this are fine?
it should be more self explanatory given the full context
In post 163, RCEnigma wrote:
Gth the only reads I have right now are aureal prob town enchant prob town.
How do u have a read on Aureal and not on a slot with way more content
In post 193, RCEnigma wrote:
Well you’re assuming all content can generate a read. Which isn’t the case.
Aureal slamming the policy vote seemed townie to me and no one else did a townie thing. Enchant is townie for the emoji thing and a byproduct of celebs posting but emojis can only take him so far so that’s more of a quicksand read.
In post 195, yessiree wrote:
i would buy that if it was like page 2 or 3, even then i still disagree with that assessment
i dont like ur implication that people posted nothing but fluff for the past 8 pages
In post 195, yessiree wrote:
i would buy that if it was like page 2 or 3, even then i still disagree with that assessment
i dont like ur implication that people posted nothing but fluff for the past 8 pages
Not what I said. I said I didn’t find any of it town indicative.
i probe him to see if his aureal and him only having 2 probtowns reads at that point was authentic or fabricated out of necessity for getting out of a jam
he responds that not all content can generate a read, but later changes this to say he didn't find any content town indicative. I felt he was using not finding anything town indicative as a justification to not having any reads
his explanation about how Aureal could've done this or that was all conjecture and i felt both replies were engineered to lead to nowhere (which, again fits his scum meta)
can you clarify if your scumread of Kitty is because he cannot justify his read on RCE or because he is posting in short bursts in general?
both kitty and RCE were both individually scummy players, and i was tryna see if i could draw some sort of associative between the 2, i dont plan on using this right way but it'll be useful later on
the kitty read i already explained in more details in our back and forth, i dont feel like regurgitating it again. Is there anything u don't agree with? or you have reasons to townread him?
You’re slanting the argument here. All content doesn’t necessarily generate content / the content generated by other slots did not result in a read either way don’t bump heads as simultaneous statements.
Idk how either reply leads nowhere if you weren’t pushing for a different conclusion. It was literally just to prove how I landed on Aureal being towny. That’s the somewhere?
I don’t think this interaction is as innocent as
being paranoid of my scumgame based on one loss that I ultimately dropped out of (even if the game was mostly over by that point). Because the approach was in bad faith at best.
It is interesting how you are throwing explicit shade at yes here; but you don't actually have him at below null apparently, judging from how you haven't yet formed an unbiased read on him:
In post 269, RCEnigma wrote:
Also also, what “more content” slots are you concerned about my not having a read on yessir? Dragon? They’re pushing me so unbiased evaluation is ongoing.
Drew and kkfc don’t have enough content to draw from either. Maybe bianco but I haven’t given their intentions much thought, I’ll cede on that I guess but it doesn’t seem that pressing.
I already called my suspicions on celeb.
btw, I don't actually care too much so whatever, but I do have a preference against
In post 261, Celebloki wrote:
I think it's pretty amazing that RC thinks he has a town read from a couple of Day 1 posts that probably weren't very serious.
I get pretty strong town reads from Aisa, Drew, and yessiree. I am also tending towards town reads from Kitty, KatyKimFanClub, and Enchant.
SNYBED doesn't seem to be doing a very good job of actually being a block. In one post Snivy admonishes DragonEater for changing his vote to leave a wagon, and then later on changes his vote shortly after DragonEater goes back on it. I'd say there's possibly more than 1 scum in the block.
I’d implore yessiree to probe my meta a little deeper to see if the reads I made here match my town games. Spoiler they do. Not that I couldn’t do it as scum but I’d make the case that meta reads on me amount to little. I’m very aware of my own meta, take that how you may.
I'm confused.
do you actually want me to look at ur town games (because I will if you link it, and I remember someone asked for that already) since your play here match your town games? or I shouldn't bother since meta reads on you amount to little
so this is just you preemptively discrediting any meta reads on you?
When i open this game, and starting read, i immediatly close it because i starting strongly consider self last townie alive and others are just jesters.
In post 261, Celebloki wrote:
I think it's pretty amazing that RC thinks he has a town read from a couple of Day 1 posts that probably weren't very serious.
I get pretty strong town reads from Aisa, Drew, and yessiree. I am also tending towards town reads from Kitty, KatyKimFanClub, and Enchant.
SNYBED doesn't seem to be doing a very good job of actually being a block. In one post Snivy admonishes DragonEater for changing his vote to leave a wagon, and then later on changes his vote shortly after DragonEater goes back on it. I'd say there's possibly more than 1 scum in the block.
Snivy can I ask you to explain what's with all this moving your vote around and shading "SNYBED" but no actual people?
i only every moved my vote twice and the second time was an unvote
and SNYBED is 5 people other than me if im deriving my own logic of "one scum in SNYBED is driving the RCE push" i wouldnt just immediately know who it is