I liked their posts. Seemed towny.In post 449, shaddowez wrote:Any reason you're still just hanging out on me then?In post 426, gob wrote: Roden seems good to me.
and yea i think you are potential scum
I liked their posts. Seemed towny.In post 449, shaddowez wrote:Any reason you're still just hanging out on me then?In post 426, gob wrote: Roden seems good to me.
I didn't disappear. Game has been dead + me sickIn post 444, Dunnstral wrote: It feels like Titus voted Roden and then disappeared. I didn't like the implication that Roden was "Frozen" as I took that to mean that Roden was having trouble with what to say when in reality it seemed Roden was just away from the game.
Oh, I misread, thought you meant good as in a lim.In post 450, gob wrote:I liked their posts. Seemed towny.In post 449, shaddowez wrote:Any reason you're still just hanging out on me then?In post 426, gob wrote: Roden seems good to me.
and yea i think you are potential scum
I feel like there has been plenty of stuff to comment on, but I do hope you feel betterIn post 451, Titus wrote:I didn't disappear. Game has been dead + me sickIn post 444, Dunnstral wrote: It feels like Titus voted Roden and then disappeared. I didn't like the implication that Roden was "Frozen" as I took that to mean that Roden was having trouble with what to say when in reality it seemed Roden was just away from the game.
I've commented on what I feel is relevant but I read people in relation to others. With no wagons, it's hard to get goingIn post 453, Black wrote:I feel like there has been plenty of stuff to comment on, but I do hope you feel betterIn post 451, Titus wrote:I didn't disappear. Game has been dead + me sickIn post 444, Dunnstral wrote: It feels like Titus voted Roden and then disappeared. I didn't like the implication that Roden was "Frozen" as I took that to mean that Roden was having trouble with what to say when in reality it seemed Roden was just away from the game.
There's a word where the social usage does not at all line up with the dictionary meaning.In post 396, Black wrote:I'd much sooner vote you for being purposely obtuseIn post 392, gob wrote: Anyone else down to vote off Crescent for these super long posts?
I am never gonna read that much, no lie.
This would be an interesting take if true. References?In post 419, Roden wrote: Titus seems scared...??
Not that it matters but there's two definitions for obtuse in the dictionary. I was using one of themIn post 456, davesaz wrote: There's a word where the social usage does not at all line up with the dictionary meaning
In post 459, davesaz wrote: That actually made it into the dictionary? Occupational hazard of being in one's 60's and having a pretty good memory.
In post 462, Black wrote: Hi pisskop. Were you planning on responding to 362? I feel like if you think I could be scum then you would want to engage with me more
VOTE: PisskopIn post 463, pisskop wrote: Ill be here and town all day
There's been a lot of small wagons this game up to 2 votes. You've effectively never given any real comments on Dave or Dunnstral, both who spent quite a while on votes. I believe Pisskop made it to 3 at one point, and has remained a topic since, but... Nothing in that direction either. I don't really like "lack of wagons" as an excuse for passively sitting on Roden for 4 days.In post 454, Titus wrote:I've commented on what I feel is relevant but I read people in relation to others. With no wagons, it's hard to get goingIn post 453, Black wrote:I feel like there has been plenty of stuff to comment on, but I do hope you feel betterIn post 451, Titus wrote:I didn't disappear. Game has been dead + me sickIn post 444, Dunnstral wrote: It feels like Titus voted Roden and then disappeared. I didn't like the implication that Roden was "Frozen" as I took that to mean that Roden was having trouble with what to say when in reality it seemed Roden was just away from the game.
What does this even mean? If you read my posts instead of dismissing them as boring you would know I don't think you're scummy based on your activity at allIn post 465, pisskop wrote: Black has a completed game with me as an IC where I didnt play for the first 4 days. Feels like she should know better
Also like what is this? You think solving for my alignment and trying to help me solve you is boring? You didn't act like this as IC at all. You were very cooperative and you actually showed signs of wanting to solve the gameIn post 465, pisskop wrote: okay, I guess I dont care to respond to it because its boring.
VOTE: CrescentIn post 464, Crescent wrote:In post 462, Black wrote: Hi pisskop. Were you planning on responding to 362? I feel like if you think I could be scum then you would want to engage with me moreVOTE: PisskopIn post 463, pisskop wrote: Ill be here and town all day
You're very selective in what you choose to respond to, and this once again highlighted it. I noticed it right away in your response to my opening post - The only part of it you responded to was the part about Gob, which was the only part of my post I would say was harmless and easy to respond to. Black and Shadow immediately had responses to give on important material in that post. It's been lingering in my mind that you've been avoiding real answers to a lot of topics, and the only time you really engaged with the game was OMGUS because you were getting voted.
Now another fresh example: You immediately responded to a legitimate follow up question with a non answer in a meaningless post. You've made a lot of posts to overall say very little, and your vote on Black has gone from feeling weak, to feeling like it's for show. It's an inflated post count trying to look active, rather than solve.
There's been a lot of small wagons this game up to 2 votes. You've effectively never given any real comments on Dave or Dunnstral, both who spent quite a while on votes. I believe Pisskop made it to 3 at one point, and has remained a topic since, but... Nothing in that direction either. I don't really like "lack of wagons" as an excuse for passively sitting on Roden for 4 days.In post 454, Titus wrote:I've commented on what I feel is relevant but I read people in relation to others. With no wagons, it's hard to get goingIn post 453, Black wrote:I feel like there has been plenty of stuff to comment on, but I do hope you feel betterIn post 451, Titus wrote:I didn't disappear. Game has been dead + me sickIn post 444, Dunnstral wrote: It feels like Titus voted Roden and then disappeared. I didn't like the implication that Roden was "Frozen" as I took that to mean that Roden was having trouble with what to say when in reality it seemed Roden was just away from the game.
I like that you said this because I felt that a little, but I've otherwise been townreading Crescent so I kinda brushed it offIn post 468, Doctor Drew wrote: I feel Crescent as being opportunistic though
I will say I do still town read Titus.In post 469, Black wrote:I like that you said this because I felt that a little, but I've otherwise been townreading Crescent so I kinda brushed it offIn post 468, Doctor Drew wrote: I feel Crescent as being opportunistic though
I suppose she could be a Titus partner trying to build a counter-wagon. But if Titus is actually town here and Crescent is scum then I'm not sure why Crescent wouldn't just join the Titus wagon
I mean it would probably be double this if you had been posting but I'm happy to finally have you hereIn post 472, Alisae wrote: Wish there were more pages made but it is what it is