In post 799, Something_Smart wrote:
The solve being off is part of why I think he's a bad vote. I'm not sure if scum-Dann feels the need to go that hard on shaddow if that wagon is likely going to go through anyway (barring Titus coming in with a steel chair).
There's also another reason that I'd rather not elaborate on right now.
I don't think it hurts Dann to go that hard on shaddow. Shaddow was pretty scummy. It was a safe push imo and it makes Dann look like he's solving if he's scum here
I think Roden is probably the best vote you could've opened the day with if you're scum here
Dannflor wrote:why would i not reevaluate if my solve is off
I think you would, but I think town!you would have spent more time than just a few minutes of re-evaluating and I think you would have walked us through your thought process
In post 803, Black wrote:
I think you would have walked us through your thought process
i don't know where you get this assumption
In both town games I recently played with you I don't think you ever just placed a naked vote without any type of explanation. When you are town you offer up your thought progression willingly
In post 804, Dannflor wrote:i don't know where you get the assumption i only spent a few minutes or that im done re-evaluating
Well, you saw the flips and then voted for Roden right after. Why would you vote for Roden if you're not done re-evaluating your read on him?
In post 811, Black wrote:
Ahhh the OMGUS vote to signal "look I'm town!"
Since when is that how people interpret OMGUS votes
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
Black, do you not see shallow reads as a bad thing? Not necessarily scummy bad, but to me the term implies that you haven't thought very deeply or considered very much.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
In post 817, Something_Smart wrote:
Black, do you not see shallow reads as a bad thing? Not necessarily scummy bad, but to me the term implies that you haven't thought very deeply or considered very much.
Eh, it's just a term. I wouldn't read too much into it.
I never believed your claim but if youve got a result lay it down.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
weird that youd set yourself up to be a policy lim tomorrow
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
In post 811, Black wrote:
There's no way you can possibly think shallow is a scumtell of mine after games we played recently. This isn't a real thought
I thought your depth of thought was much easier to see in the mini normal and that is the reason I town read you there
by all means gob, if thats a real claim lmk so we do dance
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
