I don't think "bad faith" is the correct way to characterize it, but I agree I've been reaching.In post 1969, Bingle wrote: Dragon, your takes come across as extremely bad faith and I’m having a hard time reconciling that with my read of your slot.
You think I’m scum for thinking Naerys is scum for objectively scummy things because you have meta. This is my first game with Naerys.
You think I’m scum for putting someone at e-1 with clear notification despite the fact that I’ve been openly accepting of the lim for at least 20 pages now.
You think I’m scum for being willing to lim a null read in my PoE despite also being the only person who has shown clear reasoning on the majority of the players since you’ve repped in.
And you’ve got a strong fixation with E-1 being a quick hammer despite there being very little threat of that happening fmpov.
The question here is: Why?
On Naerys, fair. I guess you don't have her meta.
On everything else: I think Eira is frankly limbait, and I think you know that from having played with them before. While I don't town read their play/tone this game, I do have a game state read which tells me they are town, simply because I can't really think of anyone who would be an Eira partner. There's like, no resistance to voting them. No counter wagons. Unless you think my vote on you is a counter wagon, which is laughable because no way I'm heaven scum!me would go for such a bad CW rather than say, consolidating on Naerys.
but yeah. If you can tell me please who Eira's partners are voting (not who they are), I might believe Eira has partners.
