small setup comment to start
"rolecop tracker" should probably be rephrased to "combined rolecop tracker" since I made the same parsing error as Titus when I first saw the role name
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
Increased teaching assistant workload brcause someone is sick, grant proposal is due, insurance denials, exams
I'm going VLA until Thursday.
"Taly is going to be a hot mess all game and I am entertained" ~ Gammagooey
"The human race is bad at reading Taly." ~the worst
"Taly I knew your slot was scum and I still struggled to find arguments to SR your play lol" ~Infinity 324
"Taly wins for the most fence-sitty reads in a game ever" ~Battle Mage
What does it mean to have someone in your highest tier who's low confidence? I thought the high tiers usually meant high confidence?
I don't object to you voting me because I've been low-impact, by the way, I can see that I need to be doing more. It is going to be tough though, I'm moving in a few days so this week is pretty busy for me.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
Scum have brains and can find these implications themselves, and we know they have day talk so they can discuss role spec in their PT instead of out in the open
I think the idea is by forcing discussion out into the open/putting two people into the spotlight, Dunnstral was making it harder to avoid talking about it
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 1133, Something_Smart wrote:
What does it mean to have someone in your highest tier who's low confidence? I thought the high tiers usually meant high confidence?
Strength of read and confidence can be different. Another way to put the same info is, I think Black is town but if I'm wrong that's one of the more likely places to be wrong.
Wanna play Minecraft with your ms friends? Check out the minecraft thread, or the channel on discord
Im actually not super stoked about speccing about the timing of the PM deliveries and the replace outs, being said replace out
One of these should be voted off.
Opening post being a vote + explanation is usually scum. Town doesn't drop an explanation with their vote because why bother?
Pisskop I think may be town, so lets vote between.
davesaz
and
shaddowez
I'll vote Shaddowez cause I've never voted them before in a game.
VOTE: Shaddowez
this feels like bullshit
what's your source on scum giving a reason for RVS votes? I've seen certain players use this to great effect but it's absolutely player-dependent in some regards. Such as: a player noticed scum often gave justifications for piling onto a specific player early on/they often gave the same username-related RVS vote logic.
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 108, Black wrote:
If I read him as just vanilla then 91 and 95 kinda feel like rolefishing. 91 in a "does my claim interfere with your role" kinda way and 95 in a more direct way veiled as a joke
I still don't think we should fade him though
this feels like an overbaked thought process
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 111, Black wrote:
I think the vote on shaddowez in 94 feels weird because gob seems to distrust people that vote with an explanation in their first post, but shaddowez's reason was literally just "I haven't played with Titus in awhile" which seems like pure RVS to me
also 2/3 of the people gob pushed in 94 were town so I think that reinforces my belief that the "scum justify RVS votes more" idea was horseradish
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 111, Black wrote:
I think the vote on shaddowez in 94 feels weird because gob seems to distrust people that vote with an explanation in their first post, but shaddowez's reason was literally just "I haven't played with Titus in awhile" which seems like pure RVS to me
What the fuck. Are you gonna just fucking link my post and give your bad take every time now? We get it, you scumread me. Save it for a big post later in the day.
that certainly is a reaction
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
I’ll probably be lurking for 2-3 hours since I gotta get back to work but I’ll be here
If anyone has something they want my thoughts on lmk, otherwise I’ll get to everything as I read the thread
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
I probably shouldn't have and with the benefit of time apart from the moment I don't think your push on me was scum indicative like I feared it was in the moment
it also had crossed my mind that the Dunn kill maybe implicated you, Black
like I think you're a likely night kill candidate as town and Dunn really isn't, so maybe scum!you wouldn't want to kill me and make yourself stand out more
but you're kinda right that a similar argument applies to me (disregarding the fact that some portion of my reads were off d1)
I'm currently trying to reevaluate from the lens of, who was generally town read and content to let the loud voices like you and me push miselims?