In post 2148, Enchant wrote: It doesh't imply that if i am town i must be correct.
There are too many of us here that have voted for miselims to conclude that poor voting is not town-indicative—we pretty much all have blood on our hands.
In post 2148, Enchant wrote: It doesh't imply that if i am town i must be correct.
Might be missing something but could you explain the bolded/italicized part? Why would the plan require someone else claiming protective?In post 2140, Enchant wrote: THS tried to kill TSQ, failed. Then "Oh well i am Vig i shot TSQ". It's safe claim, because it aligns with visits and considering kill fail means either roleblocked or target was protected.
. Python was this someone.This plan requires someone claiming other protect to work
Not sure I follow. THS self-voted early day 1, there's a long span in time between then and night 2 for views to change so i'm not sure if the self-vote actually negative correlates to the idea they were roleblocked night 2. If mafia were threatened by THS, I think it makes sense to deal with him via roleblocking night 2 if the attempted kill night 1 failed, though the question would be if mafia had reason to fear THS enough to do that by the end of day 2. Might need to go back and take a look to ascertain whether that would be the case.In post 2142, Enchant wrote: Only theory where THS are Town are:
Mafia decided to attack THS AND when failed THEN roleblock same THS who basically selfvoted and literally WAS PROTECTED BY SOMEONE ELSE.
MAFIA ROLEBLOCKED THS? WHILE KNOWING SOMEONE ELSE DEFENDED HIM? WITHOUT EVEN DIRECTLY KNOWING ABOUT HIm BEING PR?
Bruh brah breh.
Because claiming VIg when NO ONE ELSE claims successfull protect is death sentence.In post 2154, SmileyDude1 wrote:Might be missing something but could you explain the bolded/italicized part? Why would the plan require someone else claiming protective?In post 2140, Enchant wrote: THS tried to kill TSQ, failed. Then "Oh well i am Vig i shot TSQ". It's safe claim, because it aligns with visits and considering kill fail means either roleblocked or target was protected.
. Python was this someone.This plan requires someone claiming other protect to work
Honestly, I’m fine with this PoE—would personally like to go for OWER second instead of me (for obvious reasons), but I think this all lines up with everything I’ve been able to figure out so far. Happy to sign off on this with my vote.In post 2156, Enchant wrote: How i see game.
Out of table:
Black - Macho 2-shot Watcher- Killed by Mafia N3.
Spoiler: Acts
BlackStar - BG- Executed 3D
Spoiler: Acts
Python - Mafia Goon- Executed D4.
Roden - VT- Killed by Mafia N4.
Hu Tao - VT- Executed 2D
Wartortle - VT- Executed 1D
Enchant - ???- Living
POE:
Smiley - Lazy JK
Spoiler: Acts
THS - JOAT (Vig/Tracker/Doc)
Spoiler: Acts
Naerys - VT
Annie - VT
OWER - VT
Thestatusquo - VT
Mafia kills:
N1: THS tries to kill TSQ. Direct Jail.
N2: Python tries to kill Black. Direct Jail.
N3: THS kills Black.
N4: THS kills Roden.
THS>Annie>OWEN probably must win.
Start voting.
Bruh...In post 2160, AnimatedWiz wrote:Honestly, I’m fine with this PoE—would personally like to go for OWER second instead of me (for obvious reasons), but I think this all lines up with everything I’ve been able to figure out so far. Happy to sign off on this with my vote.In post 2156, Enchant wrote: How i see game.
Out of table:
Black - Macho 2-shot Watcher- Killed by Mafia N3.
Spoiler: Acts
BlackStar - BG- Executed 3D
Spoiler: Acts
Python - Mafia Goon- Executed D4.
Roden - VT- Killed by Mafia N4.
Hu Tao - VT- Executed 2D
Wartortle - VT- Executed 1D
Enchant - ???- Living
POE:
Smiley - Lazy JK
Spoiler: Acts
THS - JOAT (Vig/Tracker/Doc)
Spoiler: Acts
Naerys - VT
Annie - VT
OWER - VT
Thestatusquo - VT
Mafia kills:
N1: THS tries to kill TSQ. Direct Jail.
N2: Python tries to kill Black. Direct Jail.
N3: THS kills Black.
N4: THS kills Roden.
THS>Annie>OWEN probably must win.
Start voting.
VOTE: TheHoldSteady.
E-0.
I expected more resistance really.In post 2162, AnimatedWiz wrote: Why not? It tracks with everything I’ve said earlier this day—haven’t trust OWER, don’t trust THS any more. I’m happy with a POE that includes them, even if it means I might not be alive to see it completed D7.
I mean, I’m not just going to lie down and let myself get voted tomorrow, but if the worst case is me going first, then OWER after, it seems like a great deal in my opinion. Just a bit of a slower win.In post 2164, Enchant wrote:I expected more resistance really.In post 2162, AnimatedWiz wrote: Why not? It tracks with everything I’ve said earlier this day—haven’t trust OWER, don’t trust THS any more. I’m happy with a POE that includes them, even if it means I might not be alive to see it completed D7.
Eh whatever, if we lose we lose.
What does a misrep mean in this case? My brain can’t seem to figure it out.In post 2167, SmileyDude1 wrote: TheStatusQuo- Notable lack of interaction between the two slots while Python was alive. Could be partner indicative potentially. 2070 does stand out to me though. TSQ never voted Python day 3 (there only vote was 2008 on Naerys) and the closest they came to suspecting Python that day phase was 1738 which doesn't match the confidence expressed in 2070. Strikes as a misrep to me.
???In post 2171, AnimatedWiz wrote: Thank you for explaining, Smiley. I think you’re right about what you meant—even though THS can switch on issues quickly during his town games, I don’t remember him ever hiding that fact. I do find it odd that he would say that after how he voted for me instead of Python.