I don't see how that's in any way a scummy thing to do in RVS and it's a pretty weak reason to vote someone on page 13.In post 343, Umlaut wrote:Because I agree on reflection that saying someone is "off" and then deciding to sheep them anyway doesn't make any sense when there are a zillion other things you could also do, andIn post 337, Aliana wrote:Why do you like that point? The entire case feels a bit conspiracy-ish to me, like it's reading into things too much.In post 319, Umlaut wrote: Actually I'll answer my own question, the case in 304 isn't bad. Well, some of it is bad but at least I like the point about 36.
VOTE: Drewseems more like looking for an acceptable place to put his votethan it does like natural town play, even when the game is just starting.
The original case at least came across genuine even if it was reading too deep, this sheep of it is pinging me a little.
UNVOTE: