ZazieR wrote:@Stef
You said it yourself:
Stef wrote:Probably i would have tried to get the users who haven't posted to post
That's why I asked how you would get them to post. Especially when it's likely that a player isn't looking at this game. How would a vote get them to post when they aren't looking?
How would you know that they weren't looking? It's coincidence that Atlas got replaced. Anyway, even if selfvotes aren't a common practice, voting people who hadn't posted yet is. Why make a deal out of it? Making a deal out of things like this is what strikes me as scummy.
If I remembered correctly, you started attacking me as I voted you with reasons which you saw as stupid. After a few posts, you started attack FHQ as well. You thought that he wanted to jump with me. Then tell me, why FHQ over -TV-, while -TV- FoSed you for the reasons I voted you?
No reason. Fhq just stood out more than TV because he gave it even more credit than TV did. I did find TV's FoS a little off since it was hardly enough to warrant anything since vote hopping in the RVS is a nulltell. I said i noted it and when i state my cases it will be mentioned. I didn't ignore him/let it go.
You said that I didn't call your actions anti-town. You said this in one of your posts. But I've said that your actions were suspicious. That was my point with that question.
I don't think my actions were suspicious. This is becoming more and more a discussion over what is a tell and what is not so it's getting rather pointless
What could the RVS have done which could be helfpul for discussion later on?
Answered that already in the aforementioned posts so it makes no sense to answer it again.
I reacted like that as there was no other reaction possible. I've learned that everything you do should be helpful towards the town. Clearly, you didn't.
Well, i haven't been anti-town. You have imo when you cut the RVS short. Why i think cutting the RVS short is bad for the town i've already mentioned.
Stef wrote:Not to mention that i do not see how it's better for a player on whom we have no tells either way to be at L-2 so early.
Then why did you keep your own vote on yourself for some time?
Didn't think it would make such a big fuss. Since the second vote on me was .. well.. mine and the first one was from the RVS i didn't consider it as posing too much of a threat since i could always unvote which i did. Would have unvoted the second things got serious anyway.
Normally a vote is put on a lurker to show that player that he has a vote. To make sure that he will post. It's kind of a threat. But what's the use of this when someone is probably not checking this game?
Again.. there was no way of knowing if she was checking the game or not. Did you know somehow? because unless you knew then your point is.. pointless. As i have said before, it's a common practice on the site to vote for people who hadn't voted yet. It's a null-tell.
The reason why I wanted to know why you changed your votes the whole time, is because i don't see it happen much. May I not be curious? But now, you give a reason to your random votes (the 'post more' reason). Then I start wondering why you just didn't say that.
Not all of my votes were an incentive to post. Where have i claimed such a thing?
