In post 2647, DragonEater70 wrote:
And the reason that I am saying the votes are in bad faith is that, quite ironically (ironically since FB shaded me earlier for "fake sorting" Ari), neither you nor Ari have made a single attempt to sort me this game (unless I missed something, this question by you which I am replying to right now is the first question either of you have asked me about my reads/thoughts/etc)
This is not even true.
2617 - Firebringer asking you about your read on me [literally asking you about your thoughts] 2618 - you claiming you townread me so there's no inconsistency 2619 - Firebringer showing you that you were actually scumreading me/him in a later post and ASKING you how your mind changed 2623 - you explaining your thoughts to him again and then later admitting you got your own read wrong
In post 2647, DragonEater70 wrote:
And the reason that I am saying the votes are in bad faith is that, quite ironically (ironically since FB shaded me earlier for "fake sorting" Ari), neither you nor Ari have made a single attempt to sort me this game (unless I missed something, this question by you which I am replying to right now is the first question either of you have asked me about my reads/thoughts/etc)
This is not even true.
2617 - Firebringer asking you about your read on me [literally asking you about your thoughts] 2618 - you claiming you townread me so there's no inconsistency 2619 - Firebringer showing you that you were actually scumreading me/him in a later post and ASKING you how your mind changed 2623 - you explaining your thoughts to him again and then later admitting you got your own read wrong
python expecting me to trust their judgement when they been one of the most inconsistent players in this game is also funny to me.
But as ari extension of will. Is there where i just jump back on Titus. I feel a bit too stubborn to just resign to fact that I have to deal with dragoneater defenders like Naerys (who adds nothing of value to the conversation) and Python (Trust me bro he can't fake this)
Like I am willing to admit I can be wrong, obviously. I am not that egotistical to think i am some godsend of mafia play.
Let me just say that I am not impressed with defenses.
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
In post 2681, Firebringer wrote:
python expecting me to trust their judgement when they been one of the most inconsistent players in this game is also funny to me.
The only people in this playerlist we can read really well are Drew and DE so that isn't surprising
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Drew isn't caught up enough for us to have a good read on him. Us not getting any town pings from his posts is a little scummy but like not enough for us to do anything about it
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
I have this problem with Drew where if he's town I get very slight town pings from him but I expect to get more so I kinda leave him at null and then scumread him heavily whenever he does something scummy.
In this game I got like one town ping from him and zero scum pings. So I am guessing it *could* mean he's town, but I am also at the same spot as you, of not having enough content yet from him.
