I've now completed my initial read and done a second read of DoomCow and Gerrendus, DoomCow because he looked most suspicious to me, and Gerrendus because he is at L-1.
I don't think the case against Gerrendus is strong enough for a lynch and I suspect the main reason he is the vote leader is that he seems to be the easiest target left.
In post 377, DoomCow wrote:Finally I'd like to mention Gerrendus who did some minor semi-scummy things, and got the lynching vote.
Which "minor semi-scummy things" are you refering to here?
In post 541, DoomCow wrote:Now, for the game, I'm not fully read up, but am willing to vote: Gerrendus based on Vi's and Caboose's suspicions/reasonings.
Have you come up with any reasons of your own yet?
In post 547, Jazzmyn wrote:However, PP was put at L-1 in post #450 on November 26 (and he was lynched on November 29). DoomCow's most recent post prior to PP being put at L-1 was on November 18 and DC didn't post at all between November 18 and December 1. So, either DC is lying about having seen when PP was at L-1 and lying about his reasons for not voting PP, or DC is admitting not only to actively lurking, but doing so to the extent that he made absolutely no comment on a player being at L-1 - not even to say that he wasn't comfortable hammering in light of the claim.
He posted in the Mafia Discussion forum shortly before the deadline so he must have been around and it would be extremely odd if he hadn't even looked at the game.
I've compared DoomCow's posts in this game with other finished games and they definately seem to have a different feel about them here and a whole lot of procrastination. Post 377 was for the most part rather wishy-washy and he didn't back up his comments on Juls until
after
her replacement had been lynched.
Vote: DoomCow
I also have an FoS on Tom Mason, although I need to check this out a bit more, a niggle about Vi and Zazier to track down, plus I still have to take another look at those who haven't caught my attention, to find out whether it's because they seem okay, or because they are keeping under the radar. I'll be looking at Tom Mason next.
.
