The point of contention about Cakez was brought up by Pooky, to which i countered by mentioning you hadnt posted since Cakez wagon resurfaced, after checking that you've been on-site when the wagon did resurface the points become valid again, if not worse.In post 1649, Dunnstral wrote: What do you want me to do about sircakez getting wagoned, exactly? I didn't vote for them
I'll just quote it here for your convenience:
In post 1557, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I think Dunnstral's read of SirCakez and overt defense of him makes him TMI'd town. 585 792In post 1553, Alisae wrote: When I are up I want to see some people say why they think cakez is town
as the game has progressed and Cakez became leading wagon on a 2nd go around - Dunnstral's said nothing to defend his Cakez Townread from earlier and just kind of twiddling his thumbs trying to pretend he doesn't exist.
Feels like he wants the Cakez wagon to go through. His inactivity while Cakez/BCG are the leading wagons makes me think he's comfortable with either one going through which doesnt make sense if he's scum with scum!cakez or town with a cakez townread. Furthermore he says nothing to really defend Cakez when he does enter the thread.
Dunnstral's scumplay I would classify as "act when necessary" and I think in game states that are favorable to scum he doesn't really do much you can see G+R for an example of Dunnstral doing nothing in a game state favorable to mafia.