Could the other two, Atlanta and Asclepius, please talk to the poet in private such that their thoughts may be brought into the light with each of you as conduits? It's a little annoying how it seems that only 2/3rds of your slot is engaging with the game.
He's been busy. And, uh, not a terribly active and talkative poster in general I think? I can ask him to not bother making "catching up" posts if you'd prefer? Did you have a specific question for him?
In post 529, Argonauts wrote:
He's been busy. And, uh, not a terribly active and talkative poster in general I think? I can ask him to not bother making "catching up" posts if you'd prefer? Did you have a specific question for him?
-Atalanta
Nothing specific, just their thoughts on the game.
In post 339, Hu Tao wrote:
I think I still want not_mafia today. He is different from when he was town last time I played with him,. Definitely more reads. and then when I said it, he said 316
Reads? Where? What posts do you see as Not_Mafia making reads?
-Atalanta
He's doing way more here than what he did as town when I was with him before. So that's why I assumed these were reads
Why did I go from the bottom of your list to the top?
He's just trolling now
How so?
Look at the last name
These two posts are rather contradictory in terms of belief, and they occur only ~18 hours apart. This rather inexplicable and unexplained change of read on Not_Mafia is strange. I might just have to make an ISO on Tao in the future.
We haven't really been doing much of any discussion in private, just so you know, if you're expecting us to be able to give you anything of what he would be thinking. Are two people not enough for you?
In post 532, Argonauts wrote:
We haven't really been doing much of any discussion in private, just so you know, if you're expecting us to be able to give you anything of what he would be thinking. Are two people not enough for you?
-Atalanta
You two have been excellent in your journey thus far, and your ISO is evident of this fact.
In post 531, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
[While I was preparing the ISO on Argon, I came across this conversation with Tao. I would like to discuss these two posts in particular.
In post 339, Hu Tao wrote:
I think I still want not_mafia today. He is different from when he was town last time I played with him,. Definitely more reads. and then when I said it, he said 316
Reads? Where? What posts do you see as Not_Mafia making reads?
-Atalanta
He's doing way more here than what he did as town when I was with him before. So that's why I assumed these were reads
Why did I go from the bottom of your list to the top?
He's just trolling now
How so?
Look at the last name
These two posts are rather contradictory in terms of belief, and they occur only ~18 hours apart. This rather inexplicable and unexplained change of read on Not_Mafia is strange. I might just have to make an ISO on Tao in the future.
I don't think those posts are contradictory at all.
In post 531, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
[While I was preparing the ISO on Argon, I came across this conversation with Tao. I would like to discuss these two posts in particular.
These two posts are rather contradictory in terms of belief, and they occur only ~18 hours apart. This rather inexplicable and unexplained change of read on Not_Mafia is strange. I might just have to make an ISO on Tao in the future.
I don't think those posts are contradictory at all.
In post 531, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
[While I was preparing the ISO on Argon, I came across this conversation with Tao. I would like to discuss these two posts in particular.
These two posts are rather contradictory in terms of belief, and they occur only ~18 hours apart. This rather inexplicable and unexplained change of read on Not_Mafia is strange. I might just have to make an ISO on Tao in the future.
I don't think those posts are contradictory at all.
What are your thoughts on them?
If I'm wrong then Hu Tao can correct me, but I interpret it as Hu Tao saying that NM usually trolls almost the entire time instead of just half of the time.
In post 531, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
[While I was preparing the ISO on Argon, I came across this conversation with Tao. I would like to discuss these two posts in particular.
These two posts are rather contradictory in terms of belief, and they occur only ~18 hours apart. This rather inexplicable and unexplained change of read on Not_Mafia is strange. I might just have to make an ISO on Tao in the future.
I don't think those posts are contradictory at all.
What are your thoughts on them?
If I'm wrong then Hu Tao can correct me, but I interpret it as Hu Tao saying that NM usually trolls almost the entire time instead of just half of the time.
That is both an excellent point and also unsubstantiated by the text. I am left bewildered by this interpretation.
What's the motivation for a townie who sees supposedly scummy activity, and isn't currently voting anyone, to NOT vote the scummy activity? OTOH, scum could want to point out the activity in hope that another townie picks up on it and starts a push.
Also, your point on my question is wrong. Even if she answers yes, that just means she's playing to her overall scum meta (town would want towniness to come through in RVS). It says nothing about this particular game. It's literally designed to say nothing about this game. So, how would I push her on it, even with an affirmative answer?
All the question does is help me understand her for future games. That's why I prefaced it with "Just curious."
Oh you're serious, lmfao alright.
Even if I was serious enough to think you were >rand wolf from this, I don't care about a vote, I consider it a useless thing to flop around unless I really wanna do something with it or I'm making a joke. If a vote is what's needed to make a point, there's no point in doing anything but just voting people. We can use words, so I'll use words.
My point on your question isn't wrong, it's framed in a way that appears to be trying to make them look bad OR to make you look like you're doing something both of which are bad but I didn't even remotely care outside of poking fun until you're taking this way further than I expected it to.
What's the motivation for a townie who sees supposedly scummy activity, and isn't currently voting anyone, to NOT vote the scummy activity? OTOH, scum could want to point out the activity in hope that another townie picks up on it and starts a push.
Also, your point on my question is wrong. Even if she answers yes, that just means she's playing to her overall scum meta (town would want towniness to come through in RVS). It says nothing about this particular game. It's literally designed to say nothing about this game. So, how would I push her on it, even with an affirmative answer?
All the question does is help me understand her for future games. That's why I prefaced it with "Just curious."
Oh you're serious, lmfao alright.
Even if I was serious enough to think you were >rand wolf from this, I don't care about a vote, I consider it a useless thing to flop around unless I really wanna do something with it or I'm making a joke. If a vote is what's needed to make a point, there's no point in doing anything but just voting people. We can use words, so I'll use words.
My point on your question isn't wrong, it's framed in a way that appears to be trying to make them look bad OR to make you look like you're doing something both of which are bad but I didn't even remotely care outside of poking fun until you're taking this way further than I expected it to.
In post 531, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
[While I was preparing the ISO on Argon, I came across this conversation with Tao. I would like to discuss these two posts in particular.
These two posts are rather contradictory in terms of belief, and they occur only ~18 hours apart. This rather inexplicable and unexplained change of read on Not_Mafia is strange. I might just have to make an ISO on Tao in the future.
I don't think those posts are contradictory at all.
What are your thoughts on them?
If I'm wrong then Hu Tao can correct me, but I interpret it as Hu Tao saying that NM usually trolls almost the entire time instead of just half of the time.
Yes. He started doing nothing after being called out by me
In post 503, Jacob24 wrote:
Ill be off for a bit but if someone can catch me up I’d appreciate it.
i might be thinking too hard or (not hard enough) about this, but i feel like asking to be caught up two or three times is indicative of not having scum buddies