In post 150, Dannflor wrote:
I think if you want to actually talk about way too strong/defensive reactions early in the game, this one from Python is actually scummy
The 'actually' here strongly implies it's a contrast to something
Given the topic of conversation before was pushing on naerys, and it could be characterised as 'way too strong/defensive reactions early in the game' that's how I read it
No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.
cook i want her to explain 101 because maybe i just misinterpreted it so i'm holding my tongue on that
ausuka feels off with her push on naerys, i may be biased but i think 107 is self-explanatory so i don't get 126, it seems like she's just asking questions just to ask them and not really doing much of anything to progress the game
It was a question to the rest of you. Whether you think they were or not. Indirectly I think Dann answered and I had a related conversation with Light about it. Like, I think it was clear what I was doing when I offered a hero solve for 5 payments of 99.99. It's worth contrasting why Python was so hostile to the idea. I don't like to argue with people about their own behavior, that's not productive. I like to ask the rest of the players about people's behavior.
In post 252, Save The Dragons wrote:
cook i want her to explain 101 because maybe i just misinterpreted it so i'm holding my tongue on that
ausuka feels off with her push on naerys, i may be biased but i think 107 is self-explanatory so i don't get 126, it seems like she's just asking questions just to ask them and not really doing much of anything to progress the game
There’s less than 11 pages, of which the three players in question combined make up less than 3 pages. Since not every post they make relates to each other, it’s even easier to narrow down.
I’m mobile rn, try a triple iso of the players and see if you can see what I did. When not mobile, I can save you the work, yet all I’ll be doing is linking the posts in question. You already have my analysis of them; there’s nothing extra to give.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 150, Dannflor wrote:
I think if you want to actually talk about way too strong/defensive reactions early in the game, this one from Python is actually scummy
The 'actually' here strongly implies it's a contrast to something
Given the topic of conversation before was pushing on naerys, and it could be characterised as 'way too strong/defensive reactions early in the game' that's how I read it
i am saying i don't think naerys' reaction was scummy but i think python's was
There’s less than 11 pages, of which the three players in question combined make up less than 3 pages. Since not every post they make relates to each other, it’s even easier to narrow down.
I’m mobile rn, try a triple iso of the players and see if you can see what I did. When not mobile, I can save you the work, yet all I’ll be doing is linking the posts in question. You already have my analysis of them; there’s nothing extra to give.
In post 150, Dannflor wrote:
I think if you want to actually talk about way too strong/defensive reactions early in the game, this one from Python is actually scummy
The 'actually' here strongly implies it's a contrast to something
Given the topic of conversation before was pushing on naerys, and it could be characterised as 'way too strong/defensive reactions early in the game' that's how I read it
i am saying i don't think naerys' reaction was scummy but i think python's was
but i explained why i find naerys' NAI
i wasn't talking about Python's push on naerys
but maybe I misunderstood you somewhere
I know you weren't talking about python's push on naerys. I was simply responding largely regarding my own push on naerys
I think there is at least some content to work with now, yeah.
No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.
