Mini 686 - Chess Mafia (Done)


User avatar
Pesco47
Pesco47
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Pesco47
Goon
Goon
Posts: 865
Joined: June 29, 2008

Post Post #425 (ISO) » Sat Dec 13, 2008 3:48 pm

Post by Pesco47 »

@ mod: Move count?
User avatar
sirdanilot
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2657
Joined: October 5, 2006
Location: The Netherlands

Post Post #426 (ISO) » Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:59 am

Post by sirdanilot »

I don't see the merit of Be2?
User avatar
veerus
veerus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
veerus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 16, 2008

Post Post #427 (ISO) » Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:45 am

Post by veerus »

sirdanilot wrote:I don't see the merit of Be2?
It's a continuation move after Qc4. We develop our bishop and castle king-side when possible.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
-Fight Club
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3100
Joined: August 18, 2006
Location: Illinois

Post Post #428 (ISO) » Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:22 am

Post by The Central Scrutinizer »

Goatrevolt wrote:We wouldn't play Qb3 in response to d5...b5.

11. d5 ... b5
12. Qd4

That threatens d6, which would be really strong.
Indigo Heron wrote:I do agree with veerus about this. However, I would like to propose that we move to Bd3. It applies pressure on the f5 pawn. Black would most likely play d6 to get rid of the Queen, or d5 to complicate matters, but I see ways for us to win on either route.

move: Bd3
11. Bd3 ... d5
12. Qb3 ... b5

Our queen has nowhere to go. Our bishop has nowhere to go, and black has a pretty dominating board presence.
Indigo Heron wrote:If you guys would rather, Qxf5 is a move to consider, but to me, it's too direct.
Qxf5 isn't an available move.

-----

Here's how I see it:

1. We can play a move to develop our white squared bishop. Bd3 fails for the reasons I mentioned above (basically, it holes up our queen at b3 with no options for escape). Bd2 is better, but we still look rough after black plays d5.

2. A better option is Bd2. It doesn't restrict our queen, develops the other bishop, threatens the b4 pawn, and still allows us to castle, just via queenside. Castling is also going to be more effective, since castling to the kingside would involve also having a bishop at e2, effectively keeping the rooks from getting into the game for a while.

3. There is also d5, which is currently my top pick. It's an attacking move (I don't consider Bd3 to be attacking, as d5 shuts it down entirely) that keeps black having to respond to our attacks rather than initiate ones of their own. Black's obvious response of b5 gets met with Qd4, which continues to threaten black with the powerful d6.
There is truth in this post... please move accordingly.
"You might very well think that; I couldn't
possibly
comment."
User avatar
sirdanilot
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2657
Joined: October 5, 2006
Location: The Netherlands

Post Post #429 (ISO) » Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:50 pm

Post by sirdanilot »

veerus wrote:
sirdanilot wrote:I don't see the merit of Be2?
It's a continuation move after Qc4. We develop our bishop and castle king-side when possible.
*chess tag removed*
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. f4 e6
4. Nf3 f5
5. exf5 exf5
6. Qe2 Be7
7. Nd5 Nb4
8. Nxb4 cxb4
9. d4 Nf6
10. Qc4 a6
11. Be2
*/chess tag removed*
Then what, ...b5 or ...d5 are looming. And the bishop is still not developed until it moves to Bd3 or we move the knight away, or the queen. Maybe it's just because I think too short term, but I still don't see the merit of this move, other than the castling at kingside but that hardly warrants a move if there's no other merit.
User avatar
Pesco47
Pesco47
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Pesco47
Goon
Goon
Posts: 865
Joined: June 29, 2008

Post Post #430 (ISO) » Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:38 pm

Post by Pesco47 »

I don't like castling kingside with our pawn structure and while they still have both bishops.
User avatar
Lawrencelot
Lawrencelot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Lawrencelot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1766
Joined: October 3, 2006
Location: the Netherlands Alignment: Town

Post Post #431 (ISO) » Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:24 am

Post by Lawrencelot »

If I'm right, no one commented on my latest post. 11. Qb3 d5 12. Qa4

How about that one?
Leaving mafiascum temporarily or not due to circumstances
User avatar
Pesco47
Pesco47
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Pesco47
Goon
Goon
Posts: 865
Joined: June 29, 2008

Post Post #432 (ISO) » Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:51 am

Post by Pesco47 »

Are they forced to go d5?
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Indigo Heron
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Goon
Goon
Posts: 547
Joined: February 26, 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Post Post #433 (ISO) » Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:27 am

Post by Indigo Heron »

Lawrencelot wrote:If I'm right, no one commented on my latest post. 11. Qb3 d5 12. Qa4

How about that one?
11. Qb3 d5 12. Qa4? to me. Qa4 brings Bd7 to defend the King, and instantly, Black is on the offensive.
最愛心。。。
User avatar
Lawrencelot
Lawrencelot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Lawrencelot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1766
Joined: October 3, 2006
Location: the Netherlands Alignment: Town

Post Post #434 (ISO) » Tue Dec 16, 2008 4:56 am

Post by Lawrencelot »

Ok that's no option then.
Move: d5
for now.
Leaving mafiascum temporarily or not due to circumstances
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3100
Joined: August 18, 2006
Location: Illinois

Post Post #435 (ISO) » Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:06 am

Post by The Central Scrutinizer »

Indigo Heron wrote:
Lawrencelot wrote:If I'm right, no one commented on my latest post. 11. Qb3 d5 12. Qa4

How about that one?
11. Qb3 d5 12. Qa4? to me. Qa4 brings Bd7 to defend the King, and instantly, Black is on the offensive.
Or 11. Qb3 d5 12. Qa4 b5, and our queen has to take back a move.

Trying to probe around with our queen when we have no supporting structure is a
bad plan
. I have repeatedly said this. We need to stabilize her position so that we can get more pieces into play, and do it while not sacrificing board position. 11. d5 is our best move.
"You might very well think that; I couldn't
possibly
comment."
User avatar
veerus
veerus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
veerus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 16, 2008

Post Post #436 (ISO) » Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:58 pm

Post by veerus »

sirdanilot wrote:
veerus wrote:
sirdanilot wrote:I don't see the merit of Be2?
It's a continuation move after Qc4. We develop our bishop and castle king-side when possible.
*chess tag removed*
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. f4 e6
4. Nf3 f5
5. exf5 exf5
6. Qe2 Be7
7. Nd5 Nb4
8. Nxb4 cxb4
9. d4 Nf6
10. Qc4 a6
11. Be2
*/chess tag removed*
Then what, ...b5 or ...d5 are looming. And the bishop is still not developed until it moves to Bd3 or we move the knight away, or the queen. Maybe it's just because I think too short term, but I still don't see the merit of this move, other than the castling at kingside but that hardly warrants a move if there's no other merit.
A
big
part of why we moved 10. Qc4 is to move our bishop out so we are able to castle. Since our queen is not in any danger, there's absolutely no reason not to continue with our original plan while still delaying black castling. In response to ...b5 or ...d5, we would simply move Qd3 and be able to castle at will after that. Bottom line is that we need to castle to get our king to safety and castling queenside is a suicide due to the open c-file and pawn on b4.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
-Fight Club
User avatar
veerus
veerus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
veerus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 16, 2008

Post Post #437 (ISO) » Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:00 pm

Post by veerus »

mod: please
prod
Gorrad, Goatrevolt and Sensfan.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
-Fight Club
User avatar
MafiaSSK
MafiaSSK
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
MafiaSSK
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5338
Joined: November 25, 2007
Location: Washington, D.C.

Post Post #438 (ISO) » Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:18 am

Post by MafiaSSK »

I will prod them. Vote count up later today. Sorrry.
Call me "SSK, or "ssk". Mafia is my father.
User avatar
Goatrevolt
Goatrevolt
Pond Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Goatrevolt
Pond Scum
Pond Scum
Posts: 2421
Joined: May 17, 2008
Location: Blacksburg, VA

Post Post #439 (ISO) » Wed Dec 17, 2008 7:04 am

Post by Goatrevolt »

Prod received. I'll catch up either later today or tomorrow, depending on when I get time.
User avatar
Awesome Pants
Awesome Pants
Friends Forever! <3
User avatar
User avatar
Awesome Pants
Friends Forever! <3
Friends Forever! <3
Posts: 800
Joined: November 16, 2007
Location: Australia (GMT +10)

Post Post #440 (ISO) » Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:22 pm

Post by Awesome Pants »

Moves
d5(3)- Pesco47, The Central Scrutinizer,Lawrencelot
Be2(1)-Veerus

Not voting (8) - SensFan, Goatrevolt sirdanilot, Indigo Heron, Gorrad, Doomsday, Pesco47
[b]Currently being used By MafiaSSK for Chess Mafia. With all due permission from AP himself.[/b]
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #441 (ISO) » Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:21 pm

Post by Gorrad »

Prodded. Almost donw with finals. Haven't had the brainpower to spare to chess mafia, as it combines the high-focus aspects of both chess and mafia. Expect some sort of contribution next week (Out of town w/o computer friday-saturday).
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Indigo Heron
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Goon
Goon
Posts: 547
Joined: February 26, 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Post Post #442 (ISO) » Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:35 am

Post by Indigo Heron »

I have something that I'd like to post, especially what I've thought to be the best move for White, but I can't right now. I just got my new laptop (Sony VAIO CS!!!) and I'm currently pumping it full of
crap
uh....games and programs, as well as updating the OS system, and such, so yeah, expect a post from me pretty soon (approximately 12-14 hours).
最愛心。。。
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3100
Joined: August 18, 2006
Location: Illinois

Post Post #443 (ISO) » Thu Dec 18, 2008 4:53 am

Post by The Central Scrutinizer »

veerus wrote:
sirdanilot wrote:
veerus wrote:
sirdanilot wrote:I don't see the merit of Be2?
It's a continuation move after Qc4. We develop our bishop and castle king-side when possible.
*chess tag removed*
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. f4 e6
4. Nf3 f5
5. exf5 exf5
6. Qe2 Be7
7. Nd5 Nb4
8. Nxb4 cxb4
9. d4 Nf6
10. Qc4 a6
11. Be2
*/chess tag removed*
Then what, ...b5 or ...d5 are looming. And the bishop is still not developed until it moves to Bd3 or we move the knight away, or the queen. Maybe it's just because I think too short term, but I still don't see the merit of this move, other than the castling at kingside but that hardly warrants a move if there's no other merit.
A
big
part of why we moved 10. Qc4 is to move our bishop out so we are able to castle. Since our queen is not in any danger, there's absolutely no reason not to continue with our original plan while still delaying black castling. In response to ...b5 or ...d5, we would simply move Qd3 and be able to castle at will after that. Bottom line is that we need to castle to get our king to safety and castling queenside is a suicide due to the open c-file and pawn on b4.
:facepalm:

Chess is not a game of "right now." Whoever can see further into the future, and can make the correct decisions, wins. We shouldn't pursue a dumb line just because it's "what we were planning to do." Qc4 was a
dumb
move in the first place, and I think we should all realize and accept that now before we move forward.

Castling is not our first priority here. Minimizing the damage of having our queen twisting in the wind is.
"You might very well think that; I couldn't
possibly
comment."
User avatar
sirdanilot
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2657
Joined: October 5, 2006
Location: The Netherlands

Post Post #444 (ISO) » Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:26 am

Post by sirdanilot »

Then what were you proposing? The reason that I'm asking is because
THE MOD DID NOT PUT UP THE MOVE COUNT YET.


just a subtle hint
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3100
Joined: August 18, 2006
Location: Illinois

Post Post #445 (ISO) » Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:11 am

Post by The Central Scrutinizer »

Just a subtle hint:

The mod put up the move count three posts above mine.
"You might very well think that; I couldn't
possibly
comment."
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Indigo Heron
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Goon
Goon
Posts: 547
Joined: February 26, 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Post Post #446 (ISO) » Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:46 pm

Post by Indigo Heron »

I'm sorry, man. I really screwed up this game. I've been going over the game over and over and wondering where we went wrong with this, but I have yet to see where it is we drew/lost this game. I'll keep searching.

I propose moving to Qb3. Black is pretty developed, and he'd be threatening the kingside as well as the queenside if he is allowed to castle and bring his King's Rook into play.

For the sake of trying to win this game back, I urge you guys to see what I'm doing first, and to not speculate anything on this forum, since anything that we know and refuted as bad moves for Black are caught on by Black and hence not played.
最愛心。。。
User avatar
veerus
veerus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
veerus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 16, 2008

Post Post #447 (ISO) » Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:35 pm

Post by veerus »

No.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
-Fight Club
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Indigo Heron
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Goon
Goon
Posts: 547
Joined: February 26, 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Post Post #448 (ISO) » Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:41 pm

Post by Indigo Heron »

No? Got a more elaborate answer than that?
最愛心。。。
User avatar
veerus
veerus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
veerus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 16, 2008

Post Post #449 (ISO) » Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:53 pm

Post by veerus »

It's a bad move.. It moves the queen to the corner of the board where it becomes largely useless.

TCS: I'm not very happy with your right now. You are blatantly disregarding king safety in a key junction of the game. Not only that, you're advocating a move that shuts down the diagonal that stares down into the heart of black's position and makes our last move a complete waste. Especially since Qc4 was not a waste, and since the queen is not under attack, we need to get the king out of the middle of the board before it's too late.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
-Fight Club

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”