Jake. How would you act if I claimed loyal checker? Or loyal vigilante? Or loyal neighbourizer? They are all the exact same in this situation, my claim is not needed. I am not bending over and willingly removing my possible utility just because you just want to know. Which is what it is, and that's me speaking conservatively because I think you're Town.
I am done taking to you about this.
"Am I a ghost like you, caught between the seams of two intertwining melodies?"
In post 1006, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Jake. How would you act if I claimed loyal checker? Or loyal vigilante? Or loyal neighbourizer? They are all the exact same in this situation, my claim is not needed. I am not bending over and willingly removing my possible utility just because you just want to know. Which is what it is, and that's me speaking conservatively because I think you're Town.
I am done taking to you about this.
Those last two; Are their base PRs the ones that would recieve feedback as a result of their action, or is their feedback implied and a wider range of roles could affect the percieved feedback?
Say you were the Loyal Vig and the person you shot failed to die. Are you trying to imply that the only relevant factors in this are if they are a wolf and if you were prevented from visiting them? Wouldn't them being protected be a valid option as well?
In post 1011, JacksonVirgo wrote:
I'm not claiming, I don't care what "reasonings" you invent to believe that it's ideal. It isn't.
If you think I'm wolf,
push me
, not my role
Jackson, I'm calling your mechanical competence into question, and the main reason I could imagine a more experienced player being less competent than I is that they are lying and are scum.
In post 1016, JacksonVirgo wrote:
And I'm saying, I looked up all the roles that could affect my role and said it was roughly an 8% chance. Stop role fishing
pedit: I don't really care what you're calling out, it's meaningless
And how could we trust that it is a comprehensive list?
In post 1016, JacksonVirgo wrote:
And I'm saying, I looked up all the roles that could affect my role and said it was roughly an 8% chance. Stop role fishing
pedit: I don't really care what you're calling out, it's meaningless
And how could we trust that it is a comprehensive list?
Does it matter? As I said to Jacob himself, the chance was >rand to a substantial degree and I scum-read him anyway as did many others. You're barking up the wrong tree
"Am I a ghost like you, caught between the seams of two intertwining melodies?"
In post 1016, JacksonVirgo wrote:
And I'm saying, I looked up all the roles that could affect my role and said it was roughly an 8% chance. Stop role fishing
pedit: I don't really care what you're calling out, it's meaningless
And how could we trust that it is a comprehensive list?
Does it matter? As I said to Jacob himself, the chance was >rand to a substantial degree and I scum-read him anyway as did many others. You're barking up the wrong tree
In post 1016, JacksonVirgo wrote:
And I'm saying, I looked up all the roles that could affect my role and said it was roughly an 8% chance. Stop role fishing
pedit: I don't really care what you're calling out, it's meaningless
And how could we trust that it is a comprehensive list?
Does it matter? As I said to Jacob himself, the chance was >rand to a substantial degree and I scum-read him anyway as did many others. You're barking up the wrong tree
It might not. The only thing that might matter is that it's more likely that you are >rand scum than you would be >rand town with a framed result.
