Open 903: IC Basic [Game Over]

[Doctor Drew]

Because basically every post contains pontification about Mafia theory and not a whole lot else? It's awkward for sure. So, so consistently awkward I was starting to lean towards it maybe just being a playstyle thing. I'm certainly not opposed to a wagon there again though, could be a wolf playstyle thing.

VOTE: NotAScum

I am down for limming someone just for being mech forward(sorry mod).

VOTE: notascum

[Doctor Drew]

Ooh pagetop just after repp in, firing on all cylinders here

[TemporalLich]

VC 1.7

NotAScum

(4)

-

gob [IC]

, SzmarzLeek, Aureal, Doctor Drew

[E-1]

Aureal (2) Little Will o' Wisp, Bingle
SzmarzLeek (1) - Gypyx

Not voting: Nora., NotAScum

With 9 alive it takes 5 to exile.

Day 1 will end in (expired on 2024-02-15 17:00:00) or when an exile is reached.

[Doctor Drew]

VC 1.7

NotAScum (4) -

gob [IC]

, SzmarzLeek, Aureal, Doctor Drew

[E-1]

Aureal (2) Little Will o' Wisp, Bingle
SzmarzLeek (1) - Gypyx

Not voting: Nora., NotAScum

With 9 alive it takes 5 to exile.

Day 1 will end in (expired on 2024-02-15 17:00:00) or when an exile is reached.

Oopsiedoodle, sorry didn't realize that was E-1

[Aureal]

VOTE: NotAscum

Alright everyone hop on this wagon. This is a wolf most likely;

Wait, would they lie so blatantly in their username like that??

Hey, get your own joke material; I already wore that one out!

[Doctor Drew]

VOTE: NotAscum

Alright everyone hop on this wagon. This is a wolf most likely;

Wait, would they lie so blatantly in their username like that??

Hey, get your own joke material; I already wore that one out!

If you made a joke, but I wasn't here for it.

Did it actually happen?

[Bingle]

Bellaphant is being replaced for inactivity.

Oh sweet. I’ve been wanting to play another game with enchant. Enchant rocks.

[Bingle]

Doctor Drew replaces Bellaphant.

Oh well.

[Doctor Drew]

Bellaphant is being replaced for inactivity.

Oh sweet. I’ve been wanting to play another game with enchant. Enchant rocks.

I am afraid I have some bad news.....

[Bingle]

Bellaphant is being replaced for inactivity.

Oh sweet. I’ve been wanting to play another game with enchant. Enchant rocks.

I am afraid I have some bad news.....

I’m afraid I have some worse news: no whiskey till Saturday. I’m planning on a nice double of glenmorangie 18 to go with a steak dinner and then jack and cokes to close out the night then though.

[Bingle]

Bella's lim imo is 75% chance of a miss, I would say 3 out of 4 times people who don't give a damn are town

I sent that math to the boys in the lab, it checks out

I’m pretty sure you’re lying. All of the boys actually went to the yard to get some free milkshakes.

[Doctor Drew]

Bellaphant is being replaced for inactivity.

Oh sweet. I’ve been wanting to play another game with enchant. Enchant rocks.

I am afraid I have some bad news.....

I’m afraid I have some worse news: no whiskey till Saturday. I’m planning on a nice double of glenmorangie 18 to go with a steak dinner and then jack and cokes to close out the night then though.

Unacceptable, I can't play in a game under these conditions

Pre Edit: The lab is in fact I my front yard, what do you think brings them to to lab so willingly?

[Bingle]

I am down for limming someone just for being mech forward(sorry mod).

On that note, I think it’s time for mech advice. Doc, you should either target gob or holster tonight, with a preference for targeting gob. I’d estimate the equilibrium to favor an 80/20 split.

The reason for this does have mathematical grounding but requires understanding of topics like Nash equilibriums and a decent grounding in game theory.

With that said, it’d be way more fun if the doc targets someone who isn’t gob and the scumteam no kills to hopefully get a false innocent result on themselves. If there’s no kill tonight, IC can reveal the doc target with no risk so it’s low risk for mason, and it’s not directly impacting the timeline for scum miselim wise so it’s low risk for scum team. And we will get to talk about how Bingle talked scum into no killing night 1 which will be fun for all of the bingles in the thread.

Be the world you want to see in the change.

[Little Will o' Wisp]

UNVOTE: Aureal

[Little Will o' Wisp]

NotAScum (4) -

gob [IC]

, SzmarzLeek, Aureal, Doctor Drew

[E-1]

*stares wordlessly*

[Doctor Drew]

I am down for limming someone just for being mech forward(sorry mod).

On that note, I think it’s time for mech advice. Doc, you should either target gob or holster tonight, with a preference for targeting gob. I’d estimate the equilibrium to favor an 80/20 split.

The reason for this does have mathematical grounding but requires understanding of topics like Nash equilibriums and a decent grounding in game theory.

With that said, it’d be way more fun if the doc targets someone who isn’t gob and the scumteam no kills to hopefully get a false innocent result on themselves. If there’s no kill tonight, IC can reveal the doc target with no risk so it’s low risk for mason, and it’s not directly impacting the timeline for scum miselim wise so it’s low risk for scum team. And we will get to talk about how Bingle talked scum into no killing night 1 which will be fun for all of the bingles in the thread.

Be the world you want to see in the change.

I think I could keep Gob alive until endgame, they will obv scum at some point

[Aureal]

Glad I'm not the only one who had some confusion there

[Bingle]

Glad I'm not the only one who had some confusion there

Okay, now I’m confused. Who is confused about what now?

[Doctor Drew]

Glad I'm not the only one who had some confusion there

Okay, now I’m confused. Who is confused about what now?

This is the pro strat gameplay I signed up for

[Aureal]

Maybe role names shouldn't be allowed in usernames

[Doctor Drew]

Maybe role names shouldn't be allowed in usernames

But it doesn't say scum anywhere in your name

[Aureal]

That's not even a role name, mech fail!

[Nora.]

but overall, I think Nora is sus

sole fact that I had to ask three times to get a proper answer, makes me think she really made a scummy post and wanted to dismiss the matter

we should've gotten that answer during my first push on that post

Oh you can NOT be for real right now... x_x Yes, you asked the question three times but I responded all three ways in the exact same way. I never dodged the question or gave a dismissive response

Here's my response to the first time you asked:

that's a very naive thought to make

I don't like that you had this thought

scumreading me is fine, but pointing at partnership so early seems sus to me, especially based on such situation
I think you rather stay quiet/slight sus about your partner in a 2-scum game

...well this might be my inexperience with long form forum mafia showing. I usually start looking for connections early.

This is a complete answer. Here's my most recent response to the same question when you kept repeating it:

why do you keep beating the dead horse? x_x I've already explained my playstyle is contingent on fast-paced games where even in 24 hr Days we usually hammer within a few hours. Obviously there will be a difference in approaches but I think I am adapting well?

Those two responses by me. Are the exact same. I just elaborated in the latter. Surely you see that. xD

VOTE: SzmarzLeek

Your treatment of me aside, I don't like the rest of your 'process' either:

and after some consideration, NotAScum might be scum too

he's posting stuff that would be suicidal for scum, that's true

but I really struggle to find a towny thought process between "let's look for scum in actives" to "inactivity is scummy"

you can change your mind based on someone's posts but changing the way you look for scum in 24 hours? we're getting too farfetched there imo

hedgy read and says nothing

but overall, I think Nora is sus

sole fact that I had to ask three times to get a proper answer, makes me think she really made a scummy post and wanted to dismiss the matter

we should've gotten that answer during my first push on that post

I've already explained why this makes no sense to me x_x

Aureal is playing bad for both town and scum

she's a decent town, I played with her a bit, guess her scum game wouldn't be as bad as it is here, too?

I don't like the approach to just come into the thread and sus your opponent though

but I think she deserves another day

hedge again, says basically nothing

Bella's lim imo is 75% chance of a miss, I would say 3 out of 4 times people who don't give a damn are town

Don't understand the confidence here. I'd be interested to hear what the new replacement thinks of this stance @Doctor Drew (someone please help me figure out how pings work xD) - from your point of view, do you think your slot had done anything worth the confidence above? I personally find it hard to believe SzmarzLeek hasn't come across slanking scum and rwstfo driven players before. Slanking players are >rand in terms of alignment imo...and meta reads on specific players can skew those chances one way or another.

as for Bingle, they're kinda positioned in the middle of the thread, which is a comfortable spot for scum (not a low hanging fruit, not into leadership), but could also be a NAI for players who generally perform such plastyle in both factions

Again, a hedgy read that commits to nothing


Your posts on everybody (with the exception of myself >.>) sound like commentary from a spectator rather than opinions coming from a player... It's like youre aggressively trying to present objective-sounding takes

[SzmarzLeek]

k

VOTE: NotAScum

Why did you blindly vote NotAScum when i asked but not Aureal?

because I'm partnered with Aureal

in seriousness though: I think Aureal deserves another day, I believe she has potential to play in such a way we could clear or condemn her as the game progresses
NotAScum will be considered every cycle with their playstyle, hard slot to townlock and giving me doubts, as I said here

and after some consideration, NotAScum might be scum too

he's posting stuff that would be suicidal for scum, that's true

but I really struggle to find a towny thought process between "let's look for scum in actives" to "inactivity is scummy"

you can change your mind based on someone's posts but changing the way you look for scum in 24 hours? we're getting too farfetched there imo

also, we're nearing the deadline and earlier I assumed you were fishing for reaction, NAS push I read as more final decision, so why not follow you with assurance that it comes from a confirmed townie without scum agenda

[SzmarzLeek]

okay, Nora is probably scum