In post 1490, Ranger wrote:
I'll say you're probably never going to top town or top scum for the exact same reason; fear.
I don't believe fear has ever stopped you forming a confident read on me before. What is different about my play this game?
In post 1499, Ranger wrote:
{hellbooks, fireisredsir, JupiterXV, usesPython, Dannflor}
{Political Clout, Black, tris}
P50
On the one hand, these reads feel really solid.
On the other, I should never have a perfect readslist with everyone town except three scum. I'm not that good.
did you miss this?
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
i can't tell if python's response to ranger replacement is more likely to come from scum tmi that the slot will be towny now or from wanting to try to manifest the lim being off the table but either way it doesn't feel like a town reaction
In post 1534, fireisredsir wrote:
i can't tell if python's response to ranger replacement is more likely to come from scum tmi that the slot will be towny now or from wanting to try to manifest the lim being off the table but either way it doesn't feel like a town reaction
We ran the numbers on page 57 and concluded we can't save ourselves here so it'd be pretty weird for us to pull that, especially since a ranger/python game would mean both of us don't make it to day 2 in that case because ranger would be the optimal nightkill at that point
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
i have been noticing more and more as a pattern lately that scum have a tendency to believe that town people's reads are more locked in than they actually are
I think there's been a decent amount of conflation from people when it comes to our posts wrt "this person is scum" vs "this person is a good wagon"; namely unless scum are being stupidly blatant a scum flip won't happen today. Ranger saves the slot because regardless of how many people go "nah not feeling it" if there's even one other person that goes "ok good enough" she's already impossible to flip as scum
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 1542, fireisredsir wrote:
i have been noticing more and more as a pattern lately that scum have a tendency to believe that town people's reads are more locked in than they actually are
More playstyle in this case, our wagoneering style relies heavily on forcing compromises instead of actually casing; we're good enough at it to force a compromise lim through with 23 hours on the clock but we're not good enough to change peoples minds and also mount a counterwagon in that time so the level of locked in-ness is completely irrelevant because we can't actually leverage it
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more