In post 1768, tris wrote:
i have a bunch of completely useless posts i keep wanting to make. of the kind that probably gave ranger the impression that i was trying to seem town more than actual solving
maybe this is a wrong assumption but i feel like you'd be aware that going too hard into this style of posting would be seen as scummy and yet
it kinda just feels like you're posting that way because you want to
In post 1771, tris wrote:
i can't seem to find where you explained what problem's you had with the way python went after me
i got that kind of uncomfortable gut feeling similar to like when you say something and then someone else is all excitedly like "yeah! i totally agree! and also ____" and then they say something more extreme and you're like um wait no i didn't sign off on this
felt like they were jumping on top of my push and being uncharitable in a way that felt like they were both trying to position themselves on my side and also use it as a base to make a stronger push
In post 1771, tris wrote:
i can't seem to find where you explained what problem's you had with the way python went after me
i got that kind of uncomfortable gut feeling similar to like when you say something and then someone else is all excitedly like "yeah! i totally agree! and also ____" and then they say something more extreme and you're like um wait no i didn't sign off on this
felt like they were jumping on top of my push and being uncharitable in a way that felt like they were both trying to position themselves on my side and also use it as a base to make a stronger push
i felt used i guess
i'm finding it really difficult to hold on to the pocketing idea. but, then im also worrying that im just like crumbling at the brilliance of your analogies and explanations. the question is am i detecting an organic process or are you really good at concocting one. i guess i don't really have a specific reason to believe its the second thing other than paranoia, but also how would i have a specific reason. maybe i just have to lose to mafia you some day and be like oh thats how it is. but i am just so warry because you are someone i think i would be naturally inclined to townread.
In post 1784, tris wrote:
the question is am i detecting an organic process or are you really good at concocting one. i guess i don't really have a specific reason to believe its the second thing other than paranoia, but also how would i have a specific reason.
i think thats like a fair question
i would say probably the biggest thing that differentiates my scum and town game is that as scum i have like a plan and goals i want to execute while as town im just trying to figure stuff out
well, lol, i think some percent of the reason is because of what black said. ok so thats not necessarily a bad reason to have an idea. other people can have good ideas that i agree with.
part of it is it makes sense she would scum read me.
didnt i have some other reason? i need to review
In post 1730, Black wrote:
Like I think Ranger has a bite to her here, a sense of wanting to prove herself right that I think is more likely to come from town
actually though, couldn't mafia have a similar drive coming into a game where there's a wagon on her and she needs to shake that off?
or maybe the word bite here means something more specific i haven't noticed
i kinda feel like the discrepancy where jackson felt like they didn't care at all that they might get limmed and now ranger is pushing pretty hard for their reads to be heard and to push the wagons onto their scumreads means the slot is less likely to be a part of a consistent scum plan
