It should feel like I'm doing that, because I am. I am seeing discrepancies in your play and I am calling them out. I'm not tunnelled, I scum-read you and there's a massive difference. I've seen many posts of yours that I would deem townie purely by tone but that does not outweigh the reasons I'm scum-reading you by any degree so I'm not harping on about them.In post 441, ketchup777 wrote: It feels like you're attacking small inconsistencies in specifically my posts, and I think you're tunneling. Whether that's scum or bad play I'm not sure, but between the traitor!Jackson theory and the mafia!Jackson+Ranger theories you can stay at the top for now.
In your head, you cannot seem to see if my play is townie or scummy. So it's essentially NAI in your head and yet I'm in your top wolf pile because of random tinfoil theories you have with me and other slots? Assuming a traitor before anything else and then throwing me in a scum pool because of it. Right around the time people started pivoting to throwing my name out (and Blacks for that matter), and after you said you had nothing so you seem to be wanting to scum-read me but have nothing because you need to stay consistent and this is what you come up with. It doesn't feel like a genuine thought and this is a consistent behaviour with you this game.
