It speaks with confusing language that was not considered when the vote was cast. After more carefully rereading it, I can confirm that I have no access to its' privileged information, and thus can only go by what it states.
I will say that Dave is not on my radar at the moment.
Sometimes less than e-1 wagons claim. If scum claim something good that is held by town then they get the town to claim too and probably a 1v1. All d1 outcomes of any claim are bad for town mechanically. It's always best to d1 lim outside the top 5 or 6 in this setup aside from the rare but possible case that all 3 scum are that high.
Wanna play Minecraft with your ms friends? Check out the minecraft thread, or the channel on discord
In post 1080, Dannflor wrote:
dave what’s the point of being like “yeah look at how sus pavowski is” if you never intend to vote there or support a wagon there today
In post 1079, davesaz wrote:
Sometimes less than e-1 wagons claim. If scum claim something good that is held by town then they get the town to claim too and probably a 1v1. All d1 outcomes of any claim are bad for town mechanically. It's always best to d1 lim outside the top 5 or 6 in this setup aside from the rare but possible case that all 3 scum are that high.
I would disagree that a 1v1 is a bad outcome for town. That's a guarenteed wolf axe for the loss of at most one townie.
If anything, a 1v1 this early in the game, even at the cost of an arbitrarily powerful town PR, would be more than made up for executing 1 of 3 scum.
It speaks with confusing language that was not considered when the vote was cast. After more carefully rereading it, I can confirm that I have no access to its' privileged information, and thus can only go by what it states.
I will say that Dave is not on my radar at the moment.
Did you not get what Brian was saying in his post? That Dave contradicted himself with his different takes, depending upon what benefitted him at the moment?
This is the law, written in the stars and seeds: in the end, all things must fail. They are old as the stars.
But not older.
And you, who have your human heart again, know all their secrets still.
This is the truth you will use to break them, to rend chains apart and set their prisoners free:
In post 896, gob wrote:
I really do not like the compesition of the worst wagon .
the worst [4]:
Jake The Wolfie, May, PenguinPower, Firebringer
Unironicalyl I think we lim one of these people. I lean FB and PP.
Do you TR the worst?
It's moreso a null read. But given how everyone went against them quickly they're less likely to be mafia i'd say.
By everyone, you mean less than half of all players.
And in any case this means nothing much. We're trying to drag this game out of RVS, so some of us are trying to form a wagon to see how Duckland reacts. This is standard practice and is one of the only methods we have to get anything done today.
Perhaps you would like to help with early game info collection by joining this or similar wagons.
Getting scum early can help, I can't argue with that. But it's not the panacea that it's made out to be.
I've had several recent town losses where scum was eliminated d1 and it didn't help in the slightest. And more town losses than I can count where the only PR left that was capable of actually getting a guilty was forced to claim prematurely, NK'd, and scum skated to a win.
Wanna play Minecraft with your ms friends? Check out the minecraft thread, or the channel on discord
i asked because without the context of dave's approach to the role list, it very much looks like support for the recently growing pavowski wagon
idk it's a little strange to me to dump a comment like that but also not really show concern over the fact that the wagon is growing around those suspicions at the same time if you truly believe such a wagon is anti-town
It speaks with confusing language that was not considered when the vote was cast. After more carefully rereading it, I can confirm that I have no access to its' privileged information, and thus can only go by what it states.
I will say that Dave is not on my radar at the moment.
Did you not get what Brian was saying in his post? That Dave contradicted himself with his different takes, depending upon what benefitted him at the moment?
Those two positions are compatible, if it understands that the desire to lim outside the top of the list is a d1 strategy, while the desire to not permanently ignore slots is a whole game strategy.
Wanna play Minecraft with your ms friends? Check out the minecraft thread, or the channel on discord
In post 1093, Dannflor wrote:
i asked because without the context of dave's approach to the role list, it very much looks like support for the recently growing pavowski wagon
idk it's a little strange to me to dump a comment like that but also not really show concern over the fact that the wagon is growing around those suspicions at the same time if you truly believe such a wagon is anti-town
Perhaps it would help if I mentioned that I made the comment before re-checking the list.
Wanna play Minecraft with your ms friends? Check out the minecraft thread, or the channel on discord
It speaks with confusing language that was not considered when the vote was cast. After more carefully rereading it, I can confirm that I have no access to its' privileged information, and thus can only go by what it states.
I will say that Dave is not on my radar at the moment.
Did you not get what Brian was saying in his post? That Dave contradicted himself with his different takes, depending upon what benefitted him at the moment?
Those two positions are compatible, if it understands that the desire to lim outside the top of the list is a d1 strategy, while the desire to not permanently ignore slots is a whole game strategy.
Except it believes this is more examples of you misrepresenting things for your own benefit and purpose, whenever it benefits you situationally. You explicitly are using draft as a conditional to temporarily ignore slots for your reads, and then evolve from there. That is PRECISELY what it said, but you misrepresented it and are now using its own stance as if you were okay with it the whole time.
This is the law, written in the stars and seeds: in the end, all things must fail. They are old as the stars.
But not older.
And you, who have your human heart again, know all their secrets still.
This is the truth you will use to break them, to rend chains apart and set their prisoners free:
In post 1093, Dannflor wrote:
i asked because without the context of dave's approach to the role list, it very much looks like support for the recently growing pavowski wagon
idk it's a little strange to me to dump a comment like that but also not really show concern over the fact that the wagon is growing around those suspicions at the same time if you truly believe such a wagon is anti-town
Literally what? I have no idea what you are trying to say here.
