In post 1062, Hu Tao wrote:Man. I was about to come into today upset at koba. Because Lap's claim sounded like it was there to find miller's. But I was also going to say koba was probably town for it because of Lap's role. But now I'm shook. Also why would scum even kill the Miller claim.
If I had to guess, probably thought Disloyal Cop meant Koba would be conftown.
Which is awkward considering I suspected Koba and am going to rapidly find myself in a Deja Vu situation it seems.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 1127, usesPython wrote:
We have an inno on Enchant, also really appreciate the quickhammer lining up so that daystart happens right as we start getting busy again very cool
I feel like the game can be nearly entirely broken by looking at the current claims compared to End of Day actions, as well as looking for the pre-heavy-cop play.
I’ll be busy today, yet plan to investigate tomorrow.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 1215, Hu Tao wrote:
Also we probably shouldn't have outed our results. I doubt we only had 1 cop to find scum.
Results are fine, we just shouldn't be outing modifiers
Disloyal Cops should be claiming innos on no results, Loyal Cops should be coming out if they have a no result, etc. Everything else just gives the useful cops cover to post their results
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 1211, Ranger wrote:I feel like the game can be nearly entirely broken by looking at the current claims compared to End of Day actions, as well as looking for the pre-heavy-cop play.
I’ll be busy today, yet plan to investigate tomorrow.
For now, I’ll say I’m sure Enchant is town.
I'd prefer to not specify why at this time. I believe it very strongly; he tops my town charts for good reason.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 1211, Ranger wrote:I feel like the game can be nearly entirely broken by looking at the current claims compared to End of Day actions, as well as looking for the pre-heavy-cop play.
I’ll be busy today, yet plan to investigate tomorrow.
For now, I’ll say I’m sure Enchant is town.
I'd prefer to not specify why at this time. I believe it very strongly; he tops my town charts for good reason.
Tentative agree, we'll wait a bit before explaining
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 1215, Hu Tao wrote:Also we probably shouldn't have outed our results. I doubt we only had 1 cop to find scum.
Results are fine, we just shouldn't be outing modifiers
Disloyal Cops should be claiming innos on no results, Loyal Cops should be coming out if they have a no result, etc. Everything else just gives the useful cops cover to post their results
Also applies for Simple/Complex/Weak.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
VOTE: Titus
Gut.
I believe a town-Titus would handle my slot nearly identically to how Titus did if planning to investigate me. A Ranger N1 copcheck fits her mindset perfectly.
However, pending review, my mental memory of Titus's D1 has a slight mistake from a pre-planned scum narrative to mimic her townplay.
A scum-Titus would know she would need to mimic her town-cop mindset and would be playing attempting to mimic it.
I believe she made a slight mistake, and did something she wouldn’t have if actually town.
It’s weak, and she could just be a cop. I want to place the vote for now, pending review and investigation.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."