Open 905: Pick Your Power X/Y S/S [game over!]

[the worst]

It believes we should claim those roles in the order of, if they exist

Tracker/Jailkeeper

Then

Doctor/Roleblocker

If Tracker claims and there is a doctor doctor should not claim. Instead, it believes every player should proxy claim RB targets at that point instead of a claim.

If JK claim, then it believes RB should claim doctor still should not so no need to proxy this time, but it leaves doctor to protect our JK.

Tracker has claimed so there's no jk. Roleblocker should claim, I think doctor should just claim vt tho honestly

[the worst]

wait that was like 5 pages ago

[davesaz]

Our kitten tried to play-kill our dog. Problem was the dog is a chihuahua and was about 2 pounds at the time, and the almost-grown kitten might have pulled it off if we hadn't been right there.

[davesaz]

crap, correcting spelling made me miss 2500

[May]

I'm BP combined jailkeeper friendly neighbor

[Pavowski]

Jesus Christ the game reopens when I'm at work and there's 10 pages almost.

Diving into this in an hour or so.

[Dannflor]

Our kitten tried to play-kill our dog. Problem was the dog is a chihuahua and was about 2 pounds at the time, and the almost-grown kitten might have pulled it off if we hadn't been right there.

that's scary sorry to hear about that

[the worst]

omg good save. kittens do be fierce af until they're socialised.

[the worst]

Jesus Christ the game reopens when I'm at work and there's 10 pages almost.

Diving into this in an hour or so.

hi you're cleared & we're in auto-win.

if you're an rb, your n2 target & future n3 target will help a lot.

if you're not an rb, enjoy work

[the worst]

no rb/doc, no vig (not autowin but close)

Spoiler:

d3: 10p (3 clears), lim an uncleared VT
n3: 9p (3 clears), scum shoot dave
d4: 8p (3 clears - Jake, Pav, Brian)

rb, no vig (autowin)

Spoiler:

d3: 10p (4 clears - Brian, Pav, Jake, n2 rb target), rb announces a target, lim an uncleared VT
n3: 9p (4 clears), scum kill either dave or rb
d4: 8p is guranteed another clear because of rb, may have another clear because of dave. 5-6 clears wins.

doc, no vig, assuming worst case scenario (autowin)

Spoiler:

d3: 10p (3 clears), lim uncleared VT
n3: 9p (3 clears), scum hunt for doc
d4: 8p (4 clears), as dave is guaranteed to survive
n4: 7p (4 clears), scum shoot dave to avoid further clears
d5: 6p (4 clears)

OR:
n4: 7p (4 clears), scum shoot a clear in hopes of hitting doc, dave gets another clear
d5: 6p (4 clears) anyway

no rb/doc, 1 vig (autowin)

Spoiler:

d3: 10p (3 clears), vig announces target so dave doesn't double, we lim uncleared VT
n3: 9p, vig shoots uncleared VT, scum shoot dave
d4: 7p (4 clears) autowin

OR:
n3: 9p, scum no kill, dave gets a clear, vig shoots uncleared VT
d4: 8p (5 clears)

just writing this up so i can quote it later:

dave has claimed tracker, with a n2 clear on pavowski. there was a kill on n2, and only one scum alive, so pavowski is confirmed to be town.
jake has been outed as a neighbouriser. jake targeted oblivion last night (it has confirmed), meaning that jake is confirmed to be town.
if the above logic is correct, then as long as there is a vig, a roleblocker, or a doctor, we are in autowin.
any doc should claim vt (just protect dave tonight) and i'm pretty confident we win.
if any vig or roleblocker exists, please claim a n3 target as this will put us in auto-win right away.

[May]

Based on what I recall of pavowski I would rather say "enjoy work"

[Pavowski]

Jesus Christ the game reopens when I'm at work and there's 10 pages almost.

Diving into this in an hour or so.

hi you're cleared & we're in auto-win.

if you're an rb, your n2 target & future n3 target will help a lot.

if you're not an rb, enjoy work

Oh far out. I bid for tracker and did not get it. Sad face.

[Pavowski]

Based on what I recall of pavowski I would rather say "enjoy work"

Are you implying that I do not work or that I am incapable of enjoying it?

How dare u

[May]

The opposite of the second one

[Pavowski]

Feels hurtful, man

[May]

I'm not a man

[Pavowski]

It was, y'know, convivial

[May]

I'm letting you know it can't be

[Pavowski]

My bad.

[the worst]

i yearn for a future where e.g. "man" (a la the dude) ias a non-gendered term but sadly it's just not

[May]

appreciate you pav

worst if you want to brainstorm multiverses where you need change even less of what you wanted to do anyway to support others do it privately

[Datisi]

1

[Datisi]

2

[Datisi]

7

[Datisi]

3