Her later post doesn't feel like it's made in good faith. It feels like she realizes that saying "Hey let's execute this person right now" is a very bad look, and so backpeddles from a less defensible position into a more defensible one.
In post 315, JupiterXV wrote:
i don't think this is trolling, kay- i think it's just a scum move here
But whats the point of it??
Like "yes come on vote me" so we wouldn't do it and just hope that we will ignore him or something?
i did talk about this earlier
ok so are you asking me to explain to you why people use this strategy or why this makes jake scum?
How will this help him as scum for longer term?
I thought even before they were scum, so my problem is not in that but like
What the thought process for that
Her later post doesn't feel like it's made in good faith. It feels like she realizes that saying "Hey let's execute this person right now" is a very bad look, and so backpeddles from a less defensible position into a more defensible one.
She doesn't do that as scum unless she makes an incredibly catastrophic unpopular decision (e.g: voting with her scumbuddy t3 on Titus in open 894 before trying to push the narrative that she's been pocketing t3 right before elimination)
In post 315, JupiterXV wrote:
i don't think this is trolling, kay- i think it's just a scum move here
But whats the point of it??
Like "yes come on vote me" so we wouldn't do it and just hope that we will ignore him or something?
i did talk about this earlier
ok so are you asking me to explain to you why people use this strategy or why this makes jake scum?
How will this help him as scum for longer term?
I thought even before they were scum, so my problem is not in that but like
What the thought process for that
Her later post doesn't feel like it's made in good faith. It feels like she realizes that saying "Hey let's execute this person right now" is a very bad look, and so backpeddles from a less defensible position into a more defensible one.
She doesn't do that as scum unless she makes an incredibly catastrophic unpopular decision (e.g: voting with her scumbuddy t3 on Titus in open 894 before trying to push the narrative that she's been pocketing t3 right before elimination)
You seem to have more experience with Black than I do. What games have you played with her?
After reading the respective Day 1's from Black, her behaviour here is totally new and does not correlate with anything that she's done before, whether she be scum or town.
Therefore, I feel justified in saying that Black's actions are scummy of their own merit, and you'll need to pull some meta from her games yourself to convince me otherwise.
These posts in particular feel scum-indicative and fake. She can disagree with this assessment, but it feels like her scum case against me is built out of straws, yet despite this she is willing to axe me.
If meta ain't your thing, that's fine, you don't need to engage with it with me. We can both agree that the important stuff is only in this game and never look beyond it, that's cool.
Speaking of cool things, check out my cool post where I showed some suspicious posts, contained within this game, that originated from Black.
In post 340, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
After reading the respective Day 1's from Black, her behaviour here is totally new and does not correlate with anything that she's done before, whether she be scum or town.
Therefore, I feel justified in saying that Black's actions are scummy of their own merit, and you'll need to pull some meta from her games yourself to convince me otherwise.
It's funny how you're trying to use meta to solve me, realized it wasn't working and decided to just call me scum anyway
In post 342, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
These posts in particular feel scum-indicative and fake. She can disagree with this assessment, but it feels like her scum case against me is built out of straws, yet despite this she is willing to axe me
I don't have a scum case against you. I voted you because fire did and I wanted to see how you responded to the pressure
