[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 14154594 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Open 913 - This Game Started as an April Fools' Joke - Postgame - Mafiascum.net
In post 398, OopsieDaisy wrote:
I guess scum!moros could be prepping for a town flip on ming and trying to use that to gain leverage tomorrow but like, just saying it believes him doesn't rly do enough for that. It's also always gonna be somewhat of a risk defending your counterwagon that usually pings me as a p townie thing to do cause it's actively not self-preservational (if that's a word lol), even if it doesn't rly feel like a read that's gonna convince others.
This thought ran through my head too
In fact
VOTE: Moros
Like this 100% was my thought process when questioning, but I think this requires a ming flip to be able to sort properly.
Without getting full context yet, no matter how either flip, it sounds like ming flipping may give more information than Moros.
What additional info would it give?
Ming feels like a polarising slot. Polarising slots give information if they flip town or scum, as
usually
scum end up on either side of the arguments in some capacity, or at the very least, usually don't all end up with the exact same stances, which potentially makes the game easier to solve down the line.
Without getting full context yet, no matter how either flip, it sounds like ming flipping may give more information than Moros.
What additional info would it give?
Ming feels like a polarising slot. Polarising slots give information if they flip town or scum, as
usually
scum end up on either side of the arguments in some capacity, or at the very least, usually don't all end up with the exact same stances, which potentially makes the game easier to solve down the line.
I (maybe wrongly) assumed that the ming "lying" argument to mean he was probably scum was being pushed heavily to a point where I felt uncomfortable voting there, because it felt like an easy thing scum may have just focused on to get a mislim.
ming also did seem to be solving in posts such as 442/443 seemed like genuine town frustration, and posts such as 444/493/516/517 seemed solvey in nature, whereas Black Rangers posts didn't seem like there was an attempt to solve, so I decided to vote what I thought was more likely to flip scum instead.
In post 511, awesomeming327 wrote:
black ranger's ISO is a bit comical
It's very very detached from the game and I can't say it's towny
ive stuff to do rn but ill look into it in like aqn hour
In post 516, awesomeming327 wrote:
i've decided that black ranger's detached gameplay is more scummy than towny
it feels like actively trying to avoid having to do anything
Post
Post #580 (isolation #10) » Sun Apr 21, 2024 9:04 am
Postby Thomith »
In post 575, Elements wrote:
Can I suggest we forget/ignore the cop result for the time being (as much as possible)
There were two kills last night so it's possible there will be two again tonight which could result in one of them dead, solving the other.
In the meantime we can discuss who to vote (neither of the two) with them both in the mix to maximise spew
Then if csf is shot we have someone to vote, and if not we can just vote her
In post 577, imaginality wrote:
It seems way too early for this to be a worthwhile scum gambit from light_ganski as it'll inevitably be a 1 for 1 if CSF flips town, and way too convenient for CSF to be claiming Doctor. I believe the guilty on CSF.
Given CSF could die tonight by SK/vig we probably want to have a consensus on who we want to vote in a 'CSF flips scum tonight' scenario.
I'm gonna go reread CSF's posts; Daisy's take on the quoted post in 564 above seems plausible though.
Oh so if CSF survives the Night, we vote her, but if she doesn't we vote someone else?
Post
Post #585 (isolation #12) » Sun Apr 21, 2024 9:15 am
Postby Thomith »
Night 1 -IF WE ARE IN AN SK WORLD
11 Alive
7 Town
1 SK
3 Scum
2 Die tonight - maybe both town if we have a SK?
Day 2
9 Alive
5 Town
1 SK
3 Scum
Night 2 (If Cop Guilty Faked)
8 Alive
4 Town
1 SK
3 Scum
SK has to kill scum N2 in this hypothetical
Day 3
6 Alive
3 Town
1 SK
2 Scum
If my math isn't wrong we probably need to eliminate correctly today to avoid a worst case scenario of becoming at "ELo" during Night 2? Would still feel like a crazy gambit for a fake guilty so I'm not too sure if this worst case scenario world is right - I feel like it assumes too much.
Post
Post #588 (isolation #14) » Sun Apr 21, 2024 9:21 am
Postby Thomith »
No SK Scenario
Night 1
11 Alive
8 Town
3 Scum
Day 2 - Assuming a potential vig 1) is not One-Shot and 2) shoots the guilty and its fake
9 Alive
6 Town
3 Scum
Night 2 - if CSF isn't scum then obviously we would get light-ganski
6 Town
2 Scum
Yeah this probably is only endgame if there is an SK world over a Vig world, so it would be a huge gamble for scum to assume it's an SK (only a 50% shot from memory). Cop is probably real imo.
In post 574, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
569 feels a bit like light setting up to say this was all just a reaction test later. Whatever she says, don’t let light back out of her cop claim later
Post
Post #597 (isolation #18) » Sun Apr 21, 2024 9:34 am
Postby Thomith »
In post 596, halfasleep wrote:
i don't see any reason to disbelieve light's claim here. i'm currently likely to vote for ming again if csf is nightkilled barring anything major changing my mind tonight.
because of the way the phases work differently here, and us being in ELo or MeLo potentially not being immediately obvious because of that, I just wanted to run the numbers to check there wasn't a scenario where a scum fakeclaim couldn't just cause a win, but yeah, there's one exact scenario where that would screw us, but it would require scum to take a huge gamble that I doubt we are ever in that world.
light_ganski's posting today regarding the guilty seems genuine too.
In post 608, awesomeming327 wrote:
i do not think it makes sense for scum!Black to switch up her opinion on me so suddenly
why doesn't it make sense?
it would've taken no effort to get rid of me at all and in my opinion she would've been one of the least suspicious on the wagon, so there wasn't really any reason for her to get off if she's not genuinely solving
ofc the alternative explanation would be that black always intended to move off of ming if possible, and black ranger was the easiest target when she couldn't get enough traction on morose
I need to think about this
Are you considering ming and I as partners here? I'm confused
I believe that's the claim yes - that you swapped off of ming to try and create a new wagon to save him, with the assumption you are both a scumteam.
Tbh me following you without giving a real explanation should realistically be more suspicious imo.
In post 671, Doctor Drew wrote:I still believe this was Black trying to protect their buddy in Awesome, and if Awesome is town I could easily see Black going for the mis lim that gives less info
This feels like Drew is trying to position himself to fade me regardless of Ming's alignment
Ok, why is Daisy really trying hard to clear you if Ming is town then?
I'm not sure really. What does this have to do with you thinking I'm scum regardless of Ming's alignment?
I think you are scum with either Ming or Daisy, but I would seriously doubt that Daisy and Ming are scum together