[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 14164532 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null open 914: the coalition - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #51 (isolation #6) » Thu Apr 25, 2024 3:44 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
In post 42, implosion wrote:
A "typical" coalition in this setup involves 5 players collectively deciding that they are the coalition, and thus all 5 of those players would vote for themselves. In fact it's technically mathematically impossible to form a coalition without at least one player voting for themself: there are 5 people on the coalition, and 5 people voting for the coalition, and in a player list of 9 people that list must overlap at at least one player.
Wait you're right
That means I'm forced to suffer nominating people that nominated themselves
Post
Post #90 (isolation #13) » Thu Apr 25, 2024 7:45 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
In post 85, Cutter B wrote:
hello! did you wait for me? I'm going to reread the whole thread 4 more times to come up with points with my gut, intuition, experience or whatever i have, like you guys. No, a three more times if necessary. It's not easy, is it? 7 townies, 2 mafia goons and an 11 days long coalition phase. I wonder why 11 days. Does it take that long normally to come up with an agreement?
Post
Post #100 (isolation #15) » Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:09 am
Postby Tsawwassen »
In post 93, Cutter B wrote:
I think there's a good ‘probability’ that we will find one scum in each group, if we divide us players into grups of least and most posts. So I'm also deciding to pick two players from both groups to add into my coalition.
Curious to know why you are focusing on activity levels as an alignment indicator here
In post 18, Moros wrote:
it seems unfair to me that there's only 5 town members. it leaves them no room for error in forming their coalition. but i didn't design the setup
Honestly it's just an issue of me posting without thinking. This post put it in my head that the setup was 5v2 and I didn't even bother to double check. I do absent minded stuff like this regarding the setup pretty often
I'll give you benefit of the doubt since I also derped out at the start
Post
Post #189 (isolation #17) » Fri Apr 26, 2024 6:10 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
Townreading Black somewhat, but not gonna lie I got a gut feeling that Black vs May might have been some sort of distancing play, so I don't want the coalition to have both of them in it, I'm fine with Black being in it though!
Finding Umlaut townie during Moros vs Black.
Cutter B confuses me the more she posts... is it just me?
Don't have a read on May right now!
This coalition looks good to me right now!
HURT: all HEAL: Black, Moros, Tsawwassen, implosion, Umlaut
Post
Post #198 (isolation #18) » Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:19 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
In post 191, implosion wrote:
This is interesting because it's softly a list of you, me and my townreads; and also because it seems quite the politically infeasible coalition at this moment (granted that Moros is being a bit ambiguous about its read on me, but it did unheal me and is scumreading Black and Umlaut)
Is this a roundabout way of saying you don't townread me yet? It's ok I think you will come around though!
I know my list might not be feasible, but it is essentially a combo of including people I trust and excluding people I don't trust at the moment (May, cutter b, ceejay, don't remember the fourth...)
Post
Post #236 (isolation #20) » Sun Apr 28, 2024 3:53 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
In post 217, Moros wrote:
the thing that i started to not like about implosion is that i think he seems very logical but some of the axioms that he is starting with in order to derive his reasonings feel too strained to be taken as given.
In post 218, Moros wrote:
i think that mafia who wants to be seen as logical and correct but also wants to reach specific conclusions may employ such a strategy. he still seems good to me aside from that but it makes me more afraid to trust him.
I see your point - on other setups I would be more paranoid of his plays here, but in this setup I think he's town hunting for the coalition, so I'm more lenient on townreading him here
Post
Post #371 (isolation #26) » Tue Apr 30, 2024 5:21 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
In post 270, implosion wrote:
Tsawwassen gives me very mixed vibes. I like their opening, I like some of their vibes in general. I don't really like 189 the more I look at it. I don't really like the hedginess of the black vs may comment, nor the statement that it looked distancey but that they're still fine having one of the two on it? like, what's the thought process there? "I think both these people might be scum distancing from each other so I'm okay having exactly one of them on the coalition"? Kinda looks contrived.
That's just what I thought at the moment ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Black was vibing with May's RVS self heal in the opening, then I healed May. Then Black suddenly signaled for caution about putting May in the coalition 61. I found this sudden vibe change a little odd, and rationalized it as some sort of distancing play. It's a post with low stakes but high payoff.
In post 270, implosion wrote:
The list itself that they come up with also strikes me as a bit contrived. I mentioned at the time that it was me + my townreads + them and I mostly just said that as an amused throwaway line but there is kind of a Bayesian argument that winding up at that exact list is something that scum might be more likely to do, because it looks like a potentially politically viable coalition that has a scum inserted into it. 198 is also sort of weird, like the way that they list everyone in the game as either someone they trust or someone they don't trust, idk. It doesn't really ring true to me to the way that town approaches sorting.
This is not a strong read, and it's particularly muddled because of tsawwassen being one of those alts who is to some extent playing like an alt.
I don't really see what's the issue with me putting people I trust and townread in the coalition?
Post
Post #372 (isolation #27) » Tue Apr 30, 2024 5:40 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
There was a lot of yapping!
I don't really dig the kind of yapping from May though... Feels like the empty posting that scum tends to make.
Warming up to an Aventurine townread. Particularly liked 306 where he opted to push for clarity as an outcome of the argument, rather than arguing for the sake of arguing. I'm still townreading implosion, Black and Moros, and I'm willing to stake the game on this read being correct.
For now I'll support any coalition without May or Cutter b. I'll exclude myself if we need to compromise.
Post
Post #410 (isolation #28) » Wed May 01, 2024 4:23 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
In post 385, Aventurine wrote:
If ceejayvinoya is town I’m fairly certain the scum pair might be Cutter B and Tsawwassen but this has no basis, I was just looking at the current coalitions
In post 371, Tsawwassen wrote:
Black was vibing with May's RVS self heal in the opening, then I healed May. Then Black suddenly signaled for caution about putting May in the coalition 61. I found this sudden vibe change a little odd, and rationalized it as some sort of distancing play. It's a post with low stakes but high payoff.
I don't understand how you go from rationalizing it as some sort of distancing play, to your statement that you're okay with having one of the two of them in your coalition but not both. Distancing typically describes something scum do toward other scum. If you rationalized it as "Black might be distancing from May", why would your reaction to this not be "we should omit both Black and May from the coalition"?
My thought process was like, "Black might be trying to distance from May", "but I townread Black independently", "I'm willing to shelve that read", "but it's a cool read let me float it out there anyway". Yes it's a lot of mental gymnastics, but is it necessarily scum indicative?
In post 371, Tsawwassen wrote:
I don't really see what's the issue with me putting people I trust and townread in the coalition?
I don't really feel viscerally from your posting that the people you put in the coalition are people that you evaluated and came to trust and townread, rather than people that you as scum felt were politically expedient to call town.
They were mostly gut reads cause I saw something I liked from their posting. I don't believe in over-justifying townreads, especially that early
In post 191, implosion wrote:
This is interesting because it's softly a list of you, me and my townreads; and also because it seems quite the politically infeasible coalition at this moment (granted that Moros is being a bit ambiguous about its read on me, but it did unheal me and is scumreading Black and Umlaut)
Wait! You changed your tune! You said it was quite the politically infeasible coalition before since the people I included in my coalition were scumreading each other.
In post 421, tired person wrote:
tas how do you feel about the following, drastically different coalition?
tired person, black, tas, aventurine, may
You already know the answers to this question, bozo
did you find cutter b actively scummy? because i found her pretty towny before i replaced in
also talk to me about your may scumread and umlaut townread because we seem to diverge there.
You found your pred towny? Most convincing argument
cutter b wasn't particularly scummy per se, she just wasn't doing a whole lot, so she was like the baseline scum for me
Post
Post #435 (isolation #36) » Thu May 02, 2024 6:02 am
Postby Tsawwassen »
In post 425, tired person wrote:
i think may is town because of her complete disregard to being townread and also just an overall lack of positioning attempts.
I don't think May has done a satisfactory amount of town hunting - one of the things I'm looking for in this setup specifically, nor steered the discussion in a way that's conducive for that purpose
I don't actually know where you stand other than your current coalition votes though, what made you consider May over others?
In post 430, Moros wrote:
i think that tired person making the case that may is town while both of them are on the outskirts of being included in coalitions is more likely to be town behavior.
I don't really agree, and I think it makes a lot of sense if the solve is just TP/May
Hmm idk... seems unnecessarily risky to force two unpopular candidates into the coalition
In post 487, Tsawwassen wrote:
I'm surprised Umlaut is in so many coalitions, I forgot why I townread him tbh. If we gave him the boot we would be one step closer to convergence
HURT: Umlaut HEAL: ceejay
this makes no sense. nobody is going to converge on ceejay.
Post
Post #491 (isolation #44) » Thu May 02, 2024 8:05 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
I stated my coalition preference just earlier in 372, and then you approached me with a coalition that included the 2 players I didn't give support for
I thought you were just trolling me lol. I didn't get the sense you were actually wanting to work with me, my bad!
Post
Post #492 (isolation #45) » Thu May 02, 2024 8:08 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
Moros and implosion should be pretty self evident from their ISO. I'm not sure what exactly you're seeing from May that you're not seeing from the other two
Post
Post #515 (isolation #49) » Sun May 05, 2024 8:14 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
Reading back on tired person's ISO, it wasn't as scummy as I originally thought, so I might've given him less credit than he deserves.
But his approach felt a little blunt to me for someone who replaced in - I expected to see a "settling in" period from him, but that element was missing. So I felt like he was coming in with a more informed view on the gamestate than anticipated.
I'm not ready to call that slot town though for the fuzzy logic of townreading Black because she wants to be townread and townreading May for the opposite.
Post
Post #546 (isolation #53) » Mon May 06, 2024 11:16 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
In post 541, tired person wrote:
regarding the logic with may and black, it's all context dependant and personality dependant. the way that black wanted to be townread felt towny, while the way may didn't care about being townread also felt towny. bc they have different personalities and contexts.
You are much more than what you seem. I think I need to evaluate you differently
Post
Post #547 (isolation #54) » Mon May 06, 2024 11:18 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
In post 544, tired person wrote:
tas there's something which doesn't really add up for me. in posts 414 and 420 you seemed to be happy with a coalition that included umlaut, implosion, black, moros and aventurine. you also townread want to include yourself and ceejay. does that mean you think the scum team is exactly myself and may?
In post 544, tired person wrote:
tas there's something which doesn't really add up for me. in posts 414 and 420 you seemed to be happy with a coalition that included umlaut, implosion, black, moros and aventurine. you also townread want to include yourself and ceejay. does that mean you think the scum team is exactly myself and may?
What doesn't add up?
well aside from knowing that i'm town, do you feel me and may make sense as a scum team?
I haven't given that much thought! You two were just what I townread the least compared to everyone else
Post
Post #553 (isolation #56) » Mon May 06, 2024 11:36 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
I'm not married to my implosion townread! I thought his early game was on points but he certainly dropped in my evaluation recently. There are grounds to your read on him I'll say.
Post
Post #557 (isolation #58) » Mon May 06, 2024 11:50 pm
Postby Tsawwassen »
In post 555, the worst wrote:
i'm getting an early night tonight & waking up early tomorrow so i think i'll probably be around a lot more then. where should i focus my efforts?
Hi! Probably look at the current coalition votes (there's a consensus of about 5-6 people) and go from there