RealTime Mafia (Game Over due to too many modkills.)

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #425 (ISO) » Thu Jan 01, 2009 7:56 am

Vi wrote:
Vote Count?

Focus discussion. Less masonry, more lynching.

This. Town needs massive improvement in activity.

alvinz95 · Post Post #426 (ISO) » Thu Jan 01, 2009 8:16 am

veerus wrote:You would.. scum.

...just lynch the scum. that will move us along.

ortolan · Post Post #427 (ISO) » Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:39 pm

more votes for veerus then

Look at post 424, he can't even be bothered defending himself but still takes the opportunity to waste a few words.

Plum · Post Post #428 (ISO) » Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:10 pm

veerus wrote:You would.. scum.

As Ort said, useless. As I said, also don't like his case on Ort; it's shaky, poor logic. Attack on Alvinz bad, claim suggestion nulltell.

alvinz95 wrote:Asking whether we should have a mason claim is definitely not a suggestion, because i ASKED FOR THE TOWN'S OPINION.

Clearly Veerus is just trying to find something scummy about me and ends up picking up crap scraps.

This.

ortolan wrote:could plainly see veerus trying to lay justification to vote me today knowing what ani would flip:

veerus wrote:Agreed. If scum, ortolan is a likely scum buddy.
Even though when I suggested jester I was already voting for animorpherv

Vote: veerus

Noted. Earlier preffered Jebus lynch, but Veerus' behavior going downhill and wasn't good to begin with. Scummy.

Unvote; Vote: Veerus

veerus · Post Post #429 (ISO) » Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:47 pm

I'm vanilla.. don't waste a lynch on me.

Plum · Post Post #430 (ISO) » Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:54 pm

veerus wrote:I'm vanilla.. don't waste a lynch on me.

At a glance you're at L-7 or so, I think; very premature claim you got there.

ortolan · Post Post #431 (ISO) » Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:54 pm

claiming prematurely and narrowing the field of possible power roles for scum if you are indeed town isn't helpful to town.

and "wasting a lynch" on a vanilla is far better than "wasting a lynch" on a power role anyway (plus of course we still have no reason to believe your claim).

Narsis · Post Post #432 (ISO) » Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:58 pm

veerus acting scummier as day progresses. similar to ani(lack of defense, early/bad claim etc.).

Vote: Veerus

Meji Fan · Post Post #433 (ISO) » Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:43 pm

Claim is scummy. If true, scum can eliminate Veerus as possible power role, if not true, scum or lieing

Unvote, Vote Veerus

Pesco47 · Post Post #434 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 7:32 am

Unvote, Vote Veerus

I'm clearing alvinz as mason. I'll believe cleared over uncleared.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #435 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:03 am

I'm vanilla.. don't waste a lynch on me.

Why so early? don't like attitude. wagon pretty

Unvote, vote veerus

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #436 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:22 am

Not sold on veerus, FL and skitzer scummier. Claim's bad, but what do scum gain by claiming early?

At least there's

something

going on, I guess.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #437 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:24 am

Not sold on veerus, FL and skitzer scummier. Claim's bad, but what do scum gain by claiming early?

At least there's something going on, I guess.

Heading off votes before hammer range. Generally, closer to lynch, more trustworthy claim is.

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #438 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:27 am

Claiming townie won't head off votes.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #439 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:30 am

Claiming townie won't head off votes.

Well, there is fact that you think no benefit for scum, so you not vote.

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #440 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:50 am

Unlikely at best. Anti town? Yes, but not scumtell or towntell.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #441 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:51 am

Given meta (of MS, not veerus), not too unlikely. Or rather, not too unlikely someone eventually take advantage of meta. So, keep it scumtell. I will.

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #442 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:56 am

Given town's reaction, your meta comment is fail.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #443 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:58 am

Given town's reaction, your meta comment is fail.

Well, means it too early to try. Doesn't mean I release caught scum. I never said it good idea, just that someone claiming way too early and hoping to WIFOM out of it was bound to happen eventually.

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #444 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:02 am

You and others seem content to wagon veerus for claim alone, which isn't in itself a reason.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #445 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:05 am

You and others seem content to wagon veerus for claim alone, which isn't in itself a reason.

Seemed like good idea at time. Also enlightening about other alignments.

But no, if you read, it's not just claim.

Caboose · Post Post #446 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:49 am

Plum wrote:
veerus wrote:I'm vanilla.. don't waste a lynch on me.
At a glance you're at L-7 or so, I think; very premature claim you got there.

Is claiming early scumtell?

veerus · Post Post #447 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:49 pm

I claimed early because I realize I played poorly and have no other defense here (nor would I if claimed with more votes on me). In a game with few words, there's little to go on and I'm sure the train is partially scum-powered so pay attention.

I still believe that ortolan has been way scummier than I.

I've seen alvinz tunnel-vision on others before, and I know he won't stop. Last time he was wrong.. as is this time. Only time will prove. At least explore alternatives before lynching.

alvinz95 · Post Post #448 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 2:04 pm

MOD: MASSIVE PRODS (Jebus)

Top candidates for scum after Veerus:
-Jebus
-FL
-ortolan

Meji Fan, you bandwagon way too much.

ortolan · Post Post #449 (ISO) » Fri Jan 02, 2009 4:00 pm

veerus wrote:I claimed early because I realize I played poorly and have no other defense here (nor would I if claimed with more votes on me). In a game with few words, there's little to go on and I'm sure the train is partially scum-powered so pay attention.

I still believe that ortolan has been way scummier than I.

I've seen alvinz tunnel-vision on others before, and I know he won't stop. Last time he was wrong.. as is this time. Only time will prove. At least explore alternatives before lynching.

I recall you being more than happy to tunnel on me, with arguments others had used, which I had already addressed (see 388).