Mini 684: Quacks and Masons Mafia- Game Over

[raider8169]

yawn

we are getting nowhere fast

Voting yourself will change that or you can respond to my post where I was addressing you.

[Netlava]

Meh, pacman's last post is shady with his legacy thing.

At this point, I think it is either Netlava or you.

What makes you think I'm scum?

Still like my pacman vote.

[raider8169]

Still like my pacman vote.

Why is it you did not believe his claim? Also who do you think it the second person that is scum?

[pacman281292]

Meh, pacman's last post is shady with his legacy thing.

At this point, I think it is either Netlava or you.

What makes you think I'm scum?

Still like my pacman vote.

Vague answer: some weird comments D1 made me receive a strong scum vibe from you, but it's not that strong now (your actual behaviour is not scummy...)
Bye bye (posted because got access)

[Riceballtail]

I don't care much for Pacman's last post. Not sure the best way to react yet though.

[Netlava]

Why is it you did not believe his claim? Also who do you think it the second person that is scum?

I'm not comfortable with the fact that pacman claimed quack on the only night kill. Plus, I don't think a townie would deviate like that.

My 2nd suspect would be you.

[raider8169]

Why is it you did not believe his claim? Also who do you think it the second person that is scum?

I'm not comfortable with the fact that pacman claimed quack on the only night kill. Plus, I don't think a townie would deviate like that.

My 2nd suspect would be you.

What is there not to be comfortable with? If he did not target that person then he may still think he was a doctor. Now we have an idea of what is going on. The other town person may not have thought to do it and that is not to say it was not a townie type play but pacman thought what he was doing was in the best interest from the town.

Also why am I your second suspect?

I do not see this game getting anywhere anytime soon, might as well have a deadline as no one is really posting.

[militant]

I do not see this game getting anywhere anytime soon, might as well have a deadline as no one is really posting.

I agree with you Raider, this game is going slowly. Even I have given up trying to get anybody to reply to anything so am willing to end the day now. I still think this is a bad idea but cannot see anyone on the bandwagon unvoting so:

Vote Rofl

[Jazzmyn]

Well, that's that, then. Here's hoping we've lynched correctly.

Regards,
Jazz

[muffinhead]

The final vote count for the day

roflcopter (4)- Riceballtail, Jazzmyn, raider8169, militant

pacman281292(2)- roflcopter, Netlava

Not Voting (1)- pacman281292

It seems that roflcopter said something wrong and after trying to talk his way out of the situation he was eventually lynched. Soon after his death you see a switch fall out of his pocket. After it has been deactivated the group celebrates another successful day.

roflcopter- Mafia- lynched day 3

It is now night 3. Night choices have untill the very beginning of the 2nd of January. In other words 0:00 est. This is for 2 reasons. First of all the fact that it is christmas time. Secondly the fact that I still haven't found a replacement for pacman

.

[muffinhead]

Porochaz replaces pacman281292 which takes effect immediately.

[muffinhead]

Just letting everyone know that night choices are officially due 120 hours from this post.

[muffinhead]

You all wake up the next morning and straight away do a head count. Unfortunately you only count 5 people, so you do another head count just to confirm and also get 5 people. After that you then do a role call. You then realise that raider8169 is missing. You check to entire hospital to no avail. Finally as a group you come to the conclusion that he is dead.

raider8169- Mason- killed during night 3

It is now Day 4 and with 5 alive it takes 3 votes to lynch.

Mod Note

- I would like to apologise for being 24 hours late with starting the day. It was meant to be 144 hours from the previous post not 120. So it's my fault for the miscalculation as some reason I thought 120 hours was 6 days.

[Jazzmyn]

Netlava or militant, militant or Netlava.... I'm going to have to re-read.

Regards,
Jazz

[Riceballtail]

VOTE:militant

Die scum die.

[Jazzmyn]

Vote: militant

Regards,
Jazz

[Netlava]

Pacman's still my top suspect. I don't think a townie would go ahead and protect and violate the plan. Plus, looking through pacman's posts, he says:

At the end of the game, a doc protection/quack fail would be catastrophic and might be the definitive move.

Rofl flipping scum does not change my assessment of pacman.

Plus, pacman really doesn't vote anyone throughout the game. With rofl, though, he leaves his "legacy."

Vote: pacman

[muffinhead]

Vote Count

militant (2)- riceballtail, Jazzmyn

not voting (3) netlava, porochaz, militant

3 votes to lynch

Just note that since pacman has been replaced that the vote has not been counted.

[Jazzmyn]

Unvote: militant

for now.

Regards,
Jazz

[Porochaz]

why?

[Jazzmyn]

Because Netlava is now confirmed to be non-scum, so I want to look at her suspicions of you further, and I also want to hear from you. Please provide your thoughts on the game, i.e. who is most suspicious to you and why?

Thanks,
Jazz

[Netlava]

Vote: Porochaz

[militant]

Because Netlava is now confirmed to be non-scum

How so?

[Jazzmyn]

How so?

Is that your biggest concern? I would also like to hear from you about who you think is most likely scum and why.

Regards,
Jazz

[militant]

How so?

Is that your biggest concern? I would also like to hear from you about who you think is most likely scum and why.

Regards,
Jazz

Primarily yes, that is my biggest concern. A player refusing to vote another player on the grounds that they are confirmed to be non-scum without any visible reasoning strikes as a big concern. You failed to answer my question. How is Net cleared?

• 1.Militant
  2.Porochaz
  3.Netlava
  4.Jazzmyn
  5.Riceballtail

Porochaz I think is town, I don't think Pacman would have claimed Quack as mafia, it all seems far too risky to be a plausible strategy. Netlava could well be mafia, he has been inconsistent in his activity levels throughout the game and has not said a great deal due to that, I would like to know why you think he is confirmed non-scum. Jazz, you have been slightly more consistent in your activity, I think you are town. Rice I don't think is mafia, he has been scummy all game in my opinion, he throws his vote around like there is no tomorrow, he ignores questions and generally doesn't act to the town's advantage in thread but I don't think he is mafia, but just silly town or a distorted play style.

I think mass claim is a good idea. What does everybody else think about that? Porochaz has already claimed Quack, the masons claiming would make it much easier and then the doc would claim. After that the mafia would have to counterclaim either Quack or Doc so that would leave two people, one mafia and the other town. After that if we lynched the town, mafia would go into the night with three town, leaving two town in the morning. After that it would be game over and a town victory.