Mafia 88- Return to New Catania- Game Over!

Claus · Post Post #1075 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:24 am

In honor of the dead, let's get some stuff out of the way:

1- I'm indeed a cop, PutaPuta didn't lie about that, if anyone was still wondering.

2- I'll reveal my investigation result later today, after we had some discussion. I think if everyone pointed out who they are suspecting now and why would be a good start.

militant · Post Post #1076 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:16 am

Claus wrote:In honor of the dead, let's get some stuff out of the way:

1- I'm indeed a cop, PutaPuta didn't lie about that, if anyone was still wondering.

2- I'll reveal my investigation result later today, after we had some discussion. I think if everyone pointed out who they are suspecting now and why would be a good start.

Why are you going to reveal your result after some discussion?

Xtoxm · Post Post #1077 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:47 am

I never get the point of that either.

Ectomancer · Post Post #1078 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:56 am

*sigh*

So that people can't adjust their suspicion list based upon his results.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1079 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:01 am

That's the whole idea of the role...

tubby216 · Post Post #1080 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:23 am

but after some discussion claus could better pick out who his suspect should be.

i think what ecto is getting at this game is called "mafia" not "folllow the cop"

i still don't like OGML and i still think we should have lynched Der hammer

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1081 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:49 am

tubby216 just massively spiked my scumdar.

tubby216 wrote:but after some discussion claus could better pick out who his suspect should be.

Looks like he's trying to preemptively discredit the claimed cop...

tubby216 · Post Post #1082 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:55 am

Xylthixlm wrote:tubby216 just massively spiked my scumdar.

tubby216 wrote:but after some discussion claus could better pick out who his suspect should be.
Looks like he's trying to preemptively discredit the claimed cop...

no i was simply stating why i thought he may withhold his results,, sheesh xyl take a breath its still early in the day i have plenty of time left to make you want to lynch me, lol

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #1083 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:14 am

I still think Seraphim is guilty....

ugh,,,going to reread.

Hoopla · Post Post #1084 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:24 am

tubby216 wrote:
Xylthixlm wrote:tubby216 just massively spiked my scumdar.

tubby216 wrote:but after some discussion claus could better pick out who his suspect should be.
Looks like he's trying to preemptively discredit the claimed cop...
no i was simply stating why i thought he may withhold his results,, sheesh xyl take a breath its still early in the day i have plenty of time left to make you want to lynch me, lol

I agree with Xyl - even this last reaction doesn't seem very townish to me, I can't really place it.

I was surprised with Sir T's NK, I thought the way myself and a couple of others were heckling him, may have warranted him to live until tomorrow. It makes me wonder why scum wanted him dead - OGML was under a lot of pressure still continuing to ignore all of Sir T's replies, but it almost seems too obvious as if scum are trying to set him up.

I'm surprised there was only one NK too.

Ectomancer · Post Post #1085 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:37 am

Xtoxm wrote:That's the whole idea of the role...

You are entirely missing the point. His investigation result

confirms alignment

once we can be sure he is a cop. Right now is the time, before any results are revealed, for everyone to state what their suspicions are. That way

scum

cannot adjust their lies to fit the investigation result.[/u][/i]

militant · Post Post #1086 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:12 am

tubby216 wrote:but after some discussion claus could better pick out who his suspect should be.

i think what ecto is getting at this game is called "mafia" not "folllow the cop"

i still don't like OGML and i still think we should have lynched Der hammer

I still don't really get it. Your explanation only helped in confusing me further.

In your first sentence it seems to suggest that Claus needs to adjust his suspect list before he allows the information that only he knows into the public domain so everybody can then do what he was doing while restricting information. Firstly it does not seem logical. The second sentence also doesn't sit right with me; we would not follow the cop if he had an innocent because there is not much to follow where as we would follow the cop if he got a guilty result. This suggests you know the result of Claus's investigation which is presumably guilty. I shall be very interested as to Claus's investigation results.

iamausername · Post Post #1087 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:23 am

militant wrote:This suggests you know the result of Claus's investigation which is presumably guilty.

...how would he know that?

Totally need to reread, but, dude...

43 pages

.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1088 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:32 am

iamausername wrote:
militant wrote:This suggests you know the result of Claus's investigation which is presumably guilty.
...how would he know that?

Totally need to
re
read, but, dude...
43 pages
.

Qft.

tubby216 · Post Post #1089 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:50 am

i have no clue what his results are,

and ecto explained it better already

Elmo · Post Post #1090 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:54 am

Xylthixlm wrote:
tubby216 wrote:but after some discussion claus could better pick out who his suspect should be.
Looks like he's trying to preemptively discredit the claimed cop...

Vote: Xylthixlm

Yosarian2 · Post Post #1091 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:56 am

(nods) Yeah, it's a good idea to discuss stuff first, then he can claim later if he thinks it's best.

I still suspect Tubby, personally.

Elmo · Post Post #1092 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:02 am

Xylthixlm, earlier, wrote:Something tubby said in the answer to my question 'clicked' and convinced me he's likely town. I'm really at a loss to explain why.

is at least part of the Xyl badness.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1093 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:07 am

Trying to remember why I said that...

Oh yeah, I was comparing his play in this game to his play in relative chaos where I knew he was scum.

I can't remember what specifically made me think he was playing differently though.

tubby216 · Post Post #1094 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:29 am

well i believe i am playing differently than i did in that game

Ectomancer · Post Post #1095 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:59 pm

tubby216 wrote:i have no clue what his results are,

and ecto explained it better already

Exactly, I don't know why he chose to respond to you in that manner except to continue to act like a clueless ninny.

vote militant

vollkan · Post Post #1096 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:28 pm

Xtoxm wrote: That's the whole idea of the role...

Um...no. By withholding results, he forces people to post their opinions in ignorance of what he knows. Doing so prevents scum from avoiding attacking a confirmed innocent/attacking a confirmed guillty, and gives us more content to run with.

As for who I suspect, my initial list is still a reliable guide, albeit Claus obviously is not suspected as the list would indicate, given his claim, and DH has increased given the events which came subsequent to my list.

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #1097 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:17 pm

Vote: Militant

I like where Claus´s head is at.

Also, I agree with Elmo, Xyl feels very off.

I´m not terribly surprised that Sir T went down. I am pretty surprised that there was only one night kill.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1098 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:28 pm

The Fonz wrote:
Final Votecount: like the previous one, but with added HAMMAH!

OhGodMyLife (2): farside22, Sir Tornado

OhGodMyLife wrote:I´m not terribly surprised that Sir T went down. I am pretty surprised that there was only one night kill.

Why are you not surprised that SirT was killed? He seems like he would have been good for scum to leave alive if you're town.

Shanba · Post Post #1099 (ISO) » Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:30 am

Vote: Curiouskarmadog

Haven't you reread this game enough?

Furthermore, reading your posts in isolation: what happened to your vote on Sensfan? The vote, that is, that was accompanied thusly:

curiouskarmadog wrote:
confirm vote sensfan

SensFan wrote:I hope you realize I haven't even finished reading the thread yet...
you address BM's post After my vote and question of you...you address my request for you acknowledge my vote and questions..but you refuse to answer my questions which have nothing to do with a reread...

first scum found.

curiouskarmadog wrote:getting funnier..

good with my vote.

You then back down:

curiouskarmadog wrote:
unvote
before I head out of town

And then Sens is pretty much off the hook and you can lay down a case on Seraphim instead. I don't have any real issues with that case, tbh. But I don't like the "I'm still sure Seraphim is scum" thing after the lynch (that was why I just read your posts in isolation.) It's indicative of an attempt to renege responsibility: it's Seraphim's fault, not yours.