Mini 708 - Cheat Mafia (GAME OVER)

iLord · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:33 am

Working on Replacing Natirasha (What is this, the 6th replacement?)

GhostWriter · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:16 pm

sirdanilot wrote:It would be quite a stretch for a nat-scum to say that his miller status was gone, because then an investigative role would check on him and if he would have found a guilty he would have claimed.

Of course nat did not claim that his miller status was gone. He'd be absolutely crazy to.

That wasn't what I was trying to say at all. I was saying that, judging from the post, nothing like what Jahudo was trying to push could actually be inferred from the writing.

Jahudo · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:09 pm

GhostWriter wrote:No, it sounds like Nat is saying that there are only three question in which he has absolutely no answer. As in, they are blank.

Ok that makes sense.

Now back to this:

malthusis wrote:I cheated off of DGB's test the first day, so I saw his answer for #7, which matches the answer given to me by Nat when I traded answers with him.

Natirasha wrote: a question to malthy: did you lie to me that first day? I traded your answer to DGB

I believe malthusis's claim more than Nat's at the moment.

malthusis wrote:I would put in more right now, but the fact that only half the people here are talking makes me want to wait to see what they have to say first.

I could wait to see what answer Nat's replacement has about this first.

unvote

because someone is lying

malthusis · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:08 am

Last post is Mon Jan, 2009 8:09 pm

*twiddles thumbs* Where did everyone go?

Mod: Massprod please, I don't really want this game to be abandoned.

sirdanilot · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:26 am

I'm here.

There's clearly indeed someone lying, because suddenly the game fell to a standstill...

Axelrod · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:10 am

I am trying to work out the lie, but I think I am missing something.

Malthius cheats off of DGB and sees answer to #7 first day.

Malthius trades an answer with Nat. Nat. gives Malthius the answer to #7.

Nat. says he traded the answer he got from Malthius to DGB.

So, if Nat. were claiming that he traded #7 to DGB then he would be lying - because DGB already had the answer to #7? Is that what is being talked about.

That doesn't make any sense, though, because DGB knows what answer(s) she started with and what answer(s) she traded for. Nat. couldn't lie about that and actually get away with it.

Or is it that Malthius is saying that he didn't see the answer he gave Nat. on DGB's test when he "cheated" off DGB - and therefore Nat. would be lying about giving DGB Malthius's answer. Again - as DGB is still living, there's no way Nat. can lie about trades with DGB and get away with it.

Sorry, maybe someone can explain what I'm missing.

@Jahudo: are you now saying that the Mod. did NOT give you a list of what the "correct" answers were? You just made a mistake about that?

malthusis · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:40 am

Okay, I'll help you out here.

I traded an answer to Nat first day. When Night came I cheated off of DGB and found not only a few answers (as well as #7) but my own as well (I'm not revealing it).

Jahudo · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:18 am

We still don't know if anyone else traded with Xtomx so Nat's replacement should say which answers he gave X.

I cheated off X night 1 if that helps.

Axelrod wrote:@Jahudo: are you now saying that the Mod. did NOT give you a list of what the "correct" answers were? You just made a mistake about that?

I got confused because I thought the answers in my role PM were ones I started out with + ones I got through taking the test.

Master Ruck · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:12 pm

Sadly, this dilemma only seems possible by asking nat's replacement when/if (s)he arrives. Until then, it seems more proactive to go back to scum hunting which I'm doing now by giving this a re-read.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:30 pm

Also waiting on Nat's replacement.

Master Ruck · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:43 pm

Will finish sometime tomorrow. Sleep now then big post when I can.

sirdanilot · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:58 am

malthusis wrote:I traded an answer to Nat first day. When Night came I cheated off of DGB and found not only a few answers (as well as #7) but my own as well (I'm not revealing it).

what night was this?

malthusis · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:59 am

iLord · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:33 am

UnofficalRulerofEveryone is replacing Natirasha.

UnofficialRulerOfEveryone · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2009 2:45 pm

Hello all, I'm confused as to the situation, still talking to the mod about exactly what Nati did, I'm reading this thread tomorrow at the soonest.

Glad to be here.

Axelrod · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:15 am

malthusis wrote:Okay, I'll help you out here.

I traded an answer to Nat first day. When Night came I cheated off of DGB and found not only a few answers (as well as #7) but my own as well (I'm not revealing it).

Still not seeing it.

/obviously dense

malthusis · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:05 am

Axelrod wrote:
malthusis wrote:Okay, I'll help you out here.

I traded an answer to Nat first day. When Night came I cheated off of DGB and found not only a few answers (as well as #7) but my own as well (I'm not revealing it).
Still not seeing it.

/obviously dense

/facepalm I can't explain it you any simpler then that. Could someone else put it in clearer words?

iLord · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:08 am

Deadline: Sunday, Feburary 1st, around 4:00 EST.

I understand that with all of the replacements that this game will experience some lag, but more activity is needed. The deadline is 15 days away. If activity steps up, I may remove the deadline.

UnofficialRulerOfEveryone · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:27 am

I've read the first four pages, I'm confused as to what is happening here, I really don't like the pressure ani was getting early, but I've not read that far, so his lynch may be deserving...

I have no idea what Nat did during the nights, but I can confirm what Nat's answers marked (Well, my answers) are.

Jahudo · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:00 am

UnofficialRulerOfEveryone wrote:I have no idea what Nat did during the nights, but I can confirm what Nat's answers marked (Well, my answers) are.

You should try and get that from Nat.
The important piece of information seems to be: What Nat traded to Xtoxm and where did he get those answers?

malthusis · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:11 am

@UROE: You won't have a single clue what is happening until you read it all. P.S: It's only 15 pages, it shouldn't be hard.

UnofficialRulerOfEveryone · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:08 am

I've read the first 7 pages now, still no clue, I'm going to a basketball game, should have this game actually read by the end of tonight.

Nat, from what I understand, has fallen off the face of the earth.

Axelrod · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:36 am

malthusis wrote:
Axelrod wrote:
malthusis wrote:Okay, I'll help you out here.

I traded an answer to Nat first day. When Night came I cheated off of DGB and found not only a few answers (as well as #7) but my own as well (I'm not revealing it).
Still not seeing it.

/obviously dense
/facepalm I can't explain it you any simpler then that. Could someone else put it in clearer words?

Nat. already claimed he traded your answer to DGB, didn't he? So why is finding your answer on DGB's test suspicious? I think that's what I'm missing.

Jahudo · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:26 am

Axelrod wrote:Nat. already claimed he traded your answer to DGB, didn't he? So why is finding your answer on DGB's test suspicious? I think that's what I'm missing.

I think Nat traded some answers to DBG but not the answer in question (#7). DBG got that one from Xtoxm. Right?

malthusis · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:31 am

No, 7 is a lie. I'm confirming it /facepalm.