Mini #704: Hunchback of Notre Dame, Game Over
-
-
Urzassedatives Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 100
- Joined: August 3, 2007
-
-
Mizzy Furry
- Furry
- Furry
- Posts: 2536
- Joined: November 28, 2007
- Location: Leominster, MA
-
-
Korejora Goon
-
-
ortolan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4158
- Joined: October 27, 2008
Battousai you seem a reasonable choice for towniest (think it's redundant in my case but hey)
MM and Korejora do you have anything to say? MM expressed a desire against a mass-claim but not much else, Korejora did some maths on roles/actions but I'm not sure of her position on a Mizzy or alternative lynch at this stage. At least please comply with Batt's softclaim request of your towniest (to both of you).-
-
ThAdmiral Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5920
- Joined: September 20, 2006
- Location: The Hills
-
-
Korejora Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 435
- Joined: March 25, 2007
Battousai's idea has a lot of leaps and assumptions that are not dependable. I will need a more solid reason that it will help the town more than the mafia to state my #1 town outright.
To be sure, I would prefer to lynch Mizzy. I am still withholding my vote because most of the town doesn't seem to be done discussing the situation.-
-
Mizzy Furry
- Furry
- Furry
- Posts: 2536
- Joined: November 28, 2007
- Location: Leominster, MA
It would probably be a really good idea to discuss what will get done tomorrow. I have accepted that I'm the lynch, and I'm okay with that. Mostly. However, a lot of you are banking on me flipping scum, which I won't, and there should be a back-up plan. (You can blah blah argue about that all you want, but that's what's going to happen. I'm not saying that to prevent my lynch, I'm saying it because it's damned true.) Who will you look at? What actions will take place?PokerFace: "I need to play with [Ether] or Mizzy more often."
Nightson: "I'd be more then happy to play with Ether and Mizzy. At the same time."
Muerrto: "Mizzy is my hero and I wanna be like her when I grow younger <3"-
-
Machiavellian-Mafia Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: April 11, 2006
- Location: Florence, Italy
-
-
Korejora Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 435
- Joined: March 25, 2007
-
-
Mizzy Furry
- Furry
- Furry
- Posts: 2536
- Joined: November 28, 2007
- Location: Leominster, MA
I would highly suggest looking at the following people:Korejora wrote:Who do you want us to look at, Mizzy? If you flip town, we will know that we can trust what you said and use against the mafia.
Unless you're the traitor, I guess. Still, FWIW.
Urzassedatives
ThAdmiral
Machiavellian-Mafia
In that order.PokerFace: "I need to play with [Ether] or Mizzy more often."
Nightson: "I'd be more then happy to play with Ether and Mizzy. At the same time."
Muerrto: "Mizzy is my hero and I wanna be like her when I grow younger <3"-
-
Thestatusquo He/HimSheaHe/Him
- Shea
- Shea
- Posts: 14372
- Joined: July 27, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Chicago!
-
-
Mizzy Furry
- Furry
- Furry
- Posts: 2536
- Joined: November 28, 2007
- Location: Leominster, MA
If you're going to have more than one account and use them, the least you could do is be less lazy and post in the right one.Thestatusquo wrote:How about reasons? Other than "Those are the three people that most want me lynched right now."
Urza should be a no-brainer. Everything he suggested and posted about the ort claim and what should be done to me has screamed scum. I would feel that way no matter who the target was.
TheAd and MM are more subtle. I find that neither one has done or said very much of late, and I feel very little commitment in their posts. At this stage of the game, flying under the radar is anti-town. In fact, the read I have on both of them is so completely the same, I have trouble not seeing them as scumbuddies.PokerFace: "I need to play with [Ether] or Mizzy more often."
Nightson: "I'd be more then happy to play with Ether and Mizzy. At the same time."
Muerrto: "Mizzy is my hero and I wanna be like her when I grow younger <3"-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Why are you lessening Mizzy's list of scum/look at tomorrow? Of course you and ThAd have posted your conviction in Mizzy being scum, but MM has only said that Mizzy should be the play today (along with a few others).Thestatusquo wrote:How about reasons? Other than "Those are the three people that most want me lynched right now."
Axelrod- N/A
Battousai- Axelrod
Destructor- N/A
Korejora- refuses
MM- Battousai
Mizzy- Battousai
Ort- Battousai
ThAd- Urza
Urza- refuses
Oh no, looks like I'm going to be NK'd tonight /sarcasm-
-
Urzassedatives Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 100
- Joined: August 3, 2007
Batt, are you saying asking Mizzy to give reasons behind her suspicions is anti town? If so, why? If not, why are you attacking me for it? It seems to me that a cursory glance at who mizzy attacked today and who she now thinks is most likely to be scum are very strongly correlated to who has been attacking her. Go back and look if you think I'm wrong.
Her suspicions are only important if a) she flips town, and b) she provides valid reasoning for them. If she doesn't do a then there's too much wifom to interpret them, and if she doesn't do b) then we will not be able to reason through her suspicions and will not be able to determine if she's completely mistaken in them...
It seems important than to me to force her to give reasoned answers about why she suspects people.
Do you disagree?-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
I sure do agree. But to get the outcome desired, a simple "Could you please elaborate?" would suffice. But by saying her reason was, "Those are the three people that most want me lynched right now" throws at her list unnecessary suspicion and doubt. Since her suspicions are only useful if she's town, throwing suspicion on them isn't the way to go since we are assuming she flips town (to plan for tomorrow if its worstcase and LyLo.
So in short, I agree with the goal, not the course.-
-
Urzassedatives
-
-
Korejora Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 435
- Joined: March 25, 2007
Could you be more specific regarding Urza? "Screaming scum" is a little too vague for me to work with. Even if you think it's obvious, I feel like it would help to have it on record so your unspoken opinion doesn't get second-guessed and therefore possibly manipulated by the mafia. Also, does anyone other than Battousai have your blessing?
Batt, no offense, but I'm gonna lol pretty hard if you die tonight, after saying that.-
-
ortolan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4158
- Joined: October 27, 2008
I'd like to hear the answer to this too, could be very useful.Korejora (716) wrote:Could you be more specific regarding Urza? "Screaming scum" is a little too vague for me to work with. Even if you think it's obvious, I feel like it would help to have it on record so your unspoken opinion doesn't get second-guessed and therefore possibly manipulated by the mafia. Also, does anyone other than Battousai have your blessing?Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529
Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.-
-
Mizzy Furry
- Furry
- Furry
- Posts: 2536
- Joined: November 28, 2007
- Location: Leominster, MA
These are just from today:Korejora wrote:Could you be more specific regarding Urza? "Screaming scum" is a little too vague for me to work with. Even if you think it's obvious, I feel like it would help to have it on record so your unspoken opinion doesn't get second-guessed and therefore possibly manipulated by the mafia. Also, does anyone other than Battousai have your blessing?
Batt, no offense, but I'm gonna lol pretty hard if you die tonight, after saying that.
Said without the thought of consequences. It's not hard to guess, looking at the numbers and lynch history, that we are pretty close to lylo. Suggesting something like this is anti-town at best. He's not a noob, so he ought to know better than suggesting that we do something like that at this stage in the game. Only scum would benefit from this.Urzassedatives wrote:Guys, this is really simple.
We lynch mizzy and then tomorrow if she's town we lynch orto.
come the fuck on.
Only scum would benefit from a mass claim. (ThAdmiral was up for the mass claim, too, scumpoints for him.)Urzassedatives wrote:then perhaps it's time for a mass claim to determine if there's any other explanation for what happened?
Now he's trying fear tactics to get the town to do what he wants, and this is after he suggested that we lynch poorly twice in a row and got smacked for it.Urzassedatives wrote:Guys, if we mass claim we will figure out if mizzy is scum or if there is another plausible explanation for last night, and thats ridiculously important because we need to lynch right today or tomorrow.
Then he comes out with this piece of work. He knows he did something scummy and going on the aggressive about it. He even adds in the (bolded) softclaim which even if he's scum wouldn't be a lie.Urzassedatives wrote:GUYS STOP FLINGING YOUR VOTES AROUND AND THINK.
We have a RBed player on a night where there was no kill, and generally that should dictate that she or Orto are scum.
The only reason this could be not true is if there are confounding factors caused by other power roles.I think from my position it's pretty clear that I didn't mess with the kill in any way last night.
Let us mass claim and lynch intelligently, not do this "LOL URZA THINKS MIZZY IS SCUM VOTE: URZA"
Which pretty much seems to me to be what the case is. Erm... Excuse me, it was "scummy as hell"
hard to defend against, that. But I think I've very clearly laid out my position here, and I would be hard pressed to find a reason it's scummy.
So, challenge to the people who are voting me: what about my position is scummy. That is, what is the significant anti town motivation for what I have just laid out. It must be a doozy to be "Scummy as hell"
Let me translate:Urzassedatives wrote:2) It's true, however, considering mizzy already claimed "pro town power role" (lol, scum claim if I've ever seen one) the damage is miniscule, and I've already explained that since we NEED to lynch right today or tomorrow, the benefits of knowing for sure that mizzy is scum or if there's another possibility is drastically important to us, and outweighs outing power roles, because at this point we don't need pro town power roles, we need dead scum. it's as simple as that.
"I'm going to dismiss her role claim as obvscum so that when we lynch her and she was telling the truth, I can just point back to this and say, "Hey, I thought her claim was false for sure!" I mean, hell, the town's fucked up this much so far, maybe they'll just be blind as bats and let us do this if I make it sound like they'd be retarded to do otherwise."
Only a dipshit would not realize that protective power roles can lengthen the game by days. By carelessly tossing aside power roles at this stage, and gladly sacrificing one, he's not only weakening the town but helping them get one kill closer to winning.PokerFace: "I need to play with [Ether] or Mizzy more often."
Nightson: "I'd be more then happy to play with Ether and Mizzy. At the same time."
Muerrto: "Mizzy is my hero and I wanna be like her when I grow younger <3"-
-
Axelrod Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: February 25, 2005
Anyone else feeling that this little tiff between Urza and Mizzy is soundingjusta bit staged?
Mizzy: if you have accepted your lynch, and you are, in fact, a "pro-town power role" then ought you not be telling us what role you are and what you have done with it this game? Wouldn't that be the townie thing to do?-
-
Urzassedatives Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 100
- Joined: August 3, 2007
Pretty sure I was definitely thinking of the consequences. As I've already explained the point of this is not to set up a 1-2 lynch (which is only a point against me if mizzy comes up town) but mainly to get the town to lynch mizzy who I was pretty sure was scum. Also, as has already been stated by me, the math that supports them both telling the truth is miniscule. I grant that its a possibility, but not a large one, and mafia is probabilistic. The probability tells us that one of orto or mizzy is scum.mizzy wrote:
These are just from today:
Said without the thought of consequences. It's not hard to guess, looking at the numbers and lynch history, that we are pretty close to lylo. Suggesting something like this is anti-town at best. He's not a noob, so he ought to know better than suggesting that we do something like that at this stage in the game. Only scum would benefit from this.Urzassedatives wrote:Guys, this is really simple.
We lynch mizzy and then tomorrow if she's town we lynch orto.
come the fuck on.
Please tell us why "Only scum would benefit from a mass claim." Warrant your assertions, please.
Only scum would benefit from a mass claim. (ThAdmiral was up for the mass claim, too, scumpoints for him.)Urzassedatives wrote:then perhaps it's time for a mass claim to determine if there's any other explanation for what happened?
Actually, that post is providing the reasoning for why "mass claim benefits the town" If the consequences ARE what I am stating them as, then it's not fear tactics to state them. Do you think I'm missrepresenting the consequences? If so, how?
Now he's trying fear tactics to get the town to do what he wants, and this is after he suggested that we lynch poorly twice in a row and got smacked for it.Urzassedatives wrote:Guys, if we mass claim we will figure out if mizzy is scum or if there is another plausible explanation for last night, and thats ridiculously important because we need to lynch right today or tomorrow.
And here all I am doing is asking the people attacking me to clearly state why. I am not necessarily sure why that's scummy. If you recall batt even responded to this post with clearly laid out reasons which I responded to. How is asking what you need to defend against scummy, again?
Then he comes out with this piece of work. He knows he did something scummy and going on the aggressive about it. He even adds in the (bolded) softclaim which even if he's scum wouldn't be a lie.Urzassedatives wrote:GUYS STOP FLINGING YOUR VOTES AROUND AND THINK.
We have a RBed player on a night where there was no kill, and generally that should dictate that she or Orto are scum.
The only reason this could be not true is if there are confounding factors caused by other power roles.I think from my position it's pretty clear that I didn't mess with the kill in any way last night.
Let us mass claim and lynch intelligently, not do this "LOL URZA THINKS MIZZY IS SCUM VOTE: URZA"
Which pretty much seems to me to be what the case is. Erm... Excuse me, it was "scummy as hell"
hard to defend against, that. But I think I've very clearly laid out my position here, and I would be hard pressed to find a reason it's scummy.
So, challenge to the people who are voting me: what about my position is scummy. That is, what is the significant anti town motivation for what I have just laid out. It must be a doozy to be "Scummy as hell"
Secondly, I am not soft claiming. I am saying that I did not do anything to stop the kill from happening. The purpose of this is not to defend myself, but rather pretty clearly for people to take into account when they calculate the probability of you and orto telling the truth. This "case" looks like you're trying to find things I've said and deliberately taking them out of context and spinning them so that they "Might" seem scummy.
pardon me if your experience is different from mine, but 9/10 of the time when someone claims "Pro town power role" when under pressure, it is because they're scum. I have played over 50 games on this site and others and literally almost every time I have seen that claim, it has been from scum. Town literally don't do it. This is me disbelieving your claim. I am not sure how disbelieving someones claim is scummy. This seems to fit in pretty well with my observation that you are finding people who attack you scummy.
Let me translate:Urzassedatives wrote:2) It's true, however, considering mizzy already claimed "pro town power role" (lol, scum claim if I've ever seen one) the damage is miniscule, and I've already explained that since we NEED to lynch right today or tomorrow, the benefits of knowing for sure that mizzy is scum or if there's another possibility is drastically important to us, and outweighs outing power roles, because at this point we don't need pro town power roles, we need dead scum. it's as simple as that.
"I'm going to dismiss her role claim as obvscum so that when we lynch her and she was telling the truth, I can just point back to this and say, "Hey, I thought her claim was false for sure!" I mean, hell, the town's fucked up this much so far, maybe they'll just be blind as bats and let us do this if I make it sound like they'd be retarded to do otherwise."
Only a dipshit would not realize that protective power roles can lengthen the game by days. By carelessly tossing aside power roles at this stage, and gladly sacrificing one, he's not only weakening the town but helping them get one kill closer to winning.
WAIT WAIT WAIT WAIT.
Now you're claiming a protective power role? You claimed not to have used your power last night, so I'm pretty sure thats a complete and utter lie.
I don't understand that last passage at all if you're NOT claiming a protective role. Basically it seems like you're trying to raise the impact of lynching you arbitrarily, even though we know damn sure you're not a protective role. So either way you're being dishonest here...
Can we please lynch her already?-
-
Urzassedatives Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 100
- Joined: August 3, 2007
First part doesnt make much sense given the fact that orto would also have to be in on it.Axelrod wrote:Anyone else feeling that this little tiff between Urza and Mizzy is soundingjusta bit staged?
Mizzy: if you have accepted your lynch, and you are, in fact, a "pro-town power role" then ought you not be telling us what role you are and what you have done with it this game? Wouldn't that be the townie thing to do?
second part I agree with whole heartedly.-
-
Mizzy Furry
- Furry
- Furry
- Posts: 2536
- Joined: November 28, 2007
- Location: Leominster, MA
I am not going to tell what role I am because when I die, I will only come up as my alignment. I don't want the scum knowing any more about the set-up than they already do. And I already said what I did with my role.Axelrod wrote:Mizzy: if you have accepted your lynch, and you are, in fact, a "pro-town power role" then ought you not be telling us what role you are and what you have done with it this game? Wouldn't that be the townie thing to do?PokerFace: "I need to play with [Ether] or Mizzy more often."
Nightson: "I'd be more then happy to play with Ether and Mizzy. At the same time."
Muerrto: "Mizzy is my hero and I wanna be like her when I grow younger <3"-
-
Mizzy Furry
- Furry
- Furry
- Posts: 2536
- Joined: November 28, 2007
- Location: Leominster, MA
Did you also consider the possibility that ort is not a pro-town power role? Or that if you are wrong then town loses?Urzassedatives wrote:Pretty sure I was definitely thinking of the consequences. As I've already explained the point of this is not to set up a 1-2 lynch (which is only a point against me if mizzy comes up town) but mainly to get the town to lynch mizzy who I was pretty sure was scum. Also, as has already been stated by me, the math that supports them both telling the truth is miniscule. I grant that its a possibility, but not a large one, and mafia is probabilistic. The probability tells us that one of orto or mizzy is scum.
How can a mass claim help town? By "validating" role claims? A mass-claim can't do that. All it can do is out who the remaining power role is, who I feel we needUrzassedatives wrote:Please tell us why "Only scum would benefit from a mass claim." Warrant your assertions, please.alivein order to win.
I think you are scum who wants the town to listen to you so that you win faster, because that's exactly what your "plans" will cause.Urzassedatives wrote:Actually, that post is providing the reasoning for why "mass claim benefits the town" If the consequences ARE what I am stating them as, then it's not fear tactics to state them. Do you think I'm missrepresenting the consequences? If so, how?
I did no such thing. You said "we don't need pro town power roles" and clearly we have a protective role out there who has already spared one live.Urzassedatives wrote:WAIT WAIT WAIT WAIT.
Now you're claiming a protective power role? You claimed not to have used your power last night, so I'm pretty sure thats a complete and utter lie.PokerFace: "I need to play with [Ether] or Mizzy more often."
Nightson: "I'd be more then happy to play with Ether and Mizzy. At the same time."
Muerrto: "Mizzy is my hero and I wanna be like her when I grow younger <3"-
-
Korejora Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 435
- Joined: March 25, 2007
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-