This is not what I meant by allowing Serengeti to defend herself. Cydonia's pushes at a hammer are pretty scummy, and Serengeti's tantrum is not helping her case. What I really meant was to debate her on her record.
Penguins of the Serengeti wrote:Outing the mason group was NOT a mistake after TWO freakin' masons were voting other masons, and screwing up the mason breadcrumb signals. The town had the right to know what the scum knew.
I'm really sorry babe but the rest of us just plain old disagree on this point, and since you seem safe for the moment, I'd like to get you using that powerful logic of yours and debating this point with me, as I think it is at the core of why you are on the gallows.
I personally disagree about the mason breadcrumb signals. I explained this in a previous post:
Vino wrote:Also, why are you strawmanning some made up rule about masons not voting each other? That logic makes no sense and here's why: It is likely there may be third parties looking for masons, and voting each other is an acceptable strategy of throwing off their trails. SK's for example, or multiple mafia parties. If one of the masons dies and the town needs to figure out who are the remaining masons, they can ask the masons who are still alive, and discover lies through the usual methods of investigation or logic. With such a large mason group, masons can be verified simply by strength of numbers.
This is a game of everybody suspecting everybody else, and the same logic that gives mafia good reason to vote their scum buddies (to throw off suspicions) is the logic that gives masons good reason to vote their mason buddies. Tell why you think that isn't the case.
So even if we establish that pro-town masons should never vote their buddies, you still have to demonstrate that you had a good motive to out everybody. Lowell outing himself was suspicious but he had a reasonably pro-town cover. You outing other people is so scummy because those people should have been able to make the decision for themselves. What compounds the problem is that you gave absolutely no reason for it at the time, throwing out names like they meant nothing to you, only trying to logic yourself out of it after the fact.
If you can help clear up these two issues, it would help define whether you are a townie and we can make a clearer decision on whether or not to lynch you. If you continue the tantrum, I wouldn't blame me if you got lynched.
I don't want to lynch you if you are a townsperson, but your insistence on lynching yourself is not going to help, because it compels people to vote you whether or not you are scum. I wish you would calm down and give us something better to go on.