Is that true. As far as I know, we're in one ongoing game, and you don't know my alignment.zwetschenwasser wrote:BTW, I vote DGB because she's been scum in the last several games I've seen her in.
OMGUS
Is that true. As far as I know, we're in one ongoing game, and you don't know my alignment.zwetschenwasser wrote:BTW, I vote DGB because she's been scum in the last several games I've seen her in.
Agreed. Cult leaders are TOP PRIORITY.ting =) wrote:@X.
After God, I'd rather kill a cult leader than a cult member.
Sounds like something a cult leader would say.zwetschenwasser wrote:What???? YOU are the cult leader scum!
OKzwetschenwasser wrote:DGB: You're right! I'm the islam cult leader. Lynch me now!
Mark my words. We can check at endgame. But I'd swear myko is scum. That sort of late entry, not having a clue what's going on... scummalicious.mykonian wrote:vote ting
I saw the light.
Not my experience but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for now.mykonian wrote:problem with your explanation is, that if I was scum, I would know what was going on. Plays much easier.
This player is scum. Replacing in and just like that, adding a vote to the biggest wagon.Double A wrote:Hey guys, I'm here to replace some guy.
So who's God?
And in the meantime:VOTE: ZACHARI
I reckon but it still my duty to look for scum!mykonian wrote:that player is not the most experienced player in the world.
Good catch. To me, this suggests quite strongly that he may be god. Trust me I have a nose for this. I've been playing this game long enough.zwetschenwasser wrote:I don't like that pacman is pretending to be clueless.
The game had started on the 22. It took him 3 days of stalling before showing up for a random vote. He's making sure that the first wagon won't touch him.pacman281292 wrote:NOOO
ME MUST HAS RANDOMVOTE!
vote: Wickedestjrbecause.
Meaningless.pacman281292 wrote:mm...this is weird.
Pretending to be useful. Has noticed that some players aren't active despite his own APPARENT lack of participation.pacman281292 wrote:MOD: PROD INACTIVES
Won't even vote a claimed cult leader. Only an FOS. Yet, the comment says this was STUPID. If it was just stupid, why the FOS? Stupid isn't the same as scummy. Does pacman KNOW that zwet is merely being stupid?pacman281292 wrote:FoS: zwetchenwasser that was stupid
Has not posted in 4 days.pacman281292 wrote:Sorry. been busy.
Shows willingness to entertain any plan that doesn't include lynching him.pacman281292 wrote:mm so what are we doing? does someone have a plan to play now?
Thanks for pointing that out. Looking at the wording, does this increase the possibility that Jebus may know something about zwet's alignment that the rest of us don't?ortolan wrote:And his comments like "don't be suicidal, leave or get replaced" etc. are stupid as either zwet has already ruined the game (if he is God) or he hasn't.
He's just scum talking rubbish - he's making up a bogus reason to hop on the biggest wagon.Jebus wrote:And what about my reaction, zwet, makes you vote me?zwetschenwasser wrote:Unvote; Vote: Jebus
for his reaction to my fake God-claim.
Mr. One-line Wonder, I'd like more please.
I believe zakeri has 6, while Jebus had 4.zwetschenwasser wrote:I think Zakeri has more votes than Jebus right now, DGB. It's not opportunistic.
How do you distinguish a genuine townie response from a cliché townie response?ortolan wrote:No, I think he is not really town because he is giving a cliched in the extreme "townie" response
ORLYortolan wrote:well, in this case it's Jebus' uncharacteristic self-righteousness in comparison ti my knowledge of his meta.
Describe Jebus' meta.ortolan wrote:yes...
I know that's what you're SAYING, but you're still not explaining how you can tell 'genuine townie' from 'too townie,' in a way that I can use the rule in future games.mask man wrote:How do you tell the difference DGB?
When a response is TOO town,
how town is too town? When the playerclearlyis making an effort to seem town, which jebus was doing.
He wasn't just having a normal townie reaction, he was making that statement for the sole purpose of looking town(which a towns member wouldn't do) and if he is scum, to redirect attention at the God claimer(which wasn't really needed because obv attention will be shifted like that, as it was, because we got scum reactions and later looked back at it.). If he toned the "WTF DUN U CLAIM GAWDZ0R" down to a "dude, wtf?" or something, it wouldn't be like this.
Calm down. It's clear that Jebus is being bus'ed. Jebus' statement was perfectly fine and innocuous. However, his buddies want to distance themselves from Jebus by making totally bogus cases. I'm helping them along with my vote.SilverPhoenix wrote:/shakes head
You're going to have to be more specific than that if you don't want me screaming Too Townie at you and how your argument is fallacious. Tell mewhatstatements were persuasive and I'll be willing to play ball, because right now I don't have a problem with Jebus' statements at all (as I stated in my previous post).
And why is that?Jebus wrote:ort- I'll hold off on this one for right now.
NO. Sometimes it's not enough to play a good game if your buddies give you away.Jahudo wrote:Do you have any reason apart from being distanced to think Jebus is scum?DrippingGoofball wrote:Calm down. It's clear that Jebus is being bus'ed. Jebus' statement was perfectly fine and innocuous. However, his buddies want to distance themselves from Jebus by making totally bogus cases. I'm helping them along with my vote.
From experience. He would be bus'ed big time. On day one. Right out of the garage.mykonian wrote:God wouldn't be bussed, would he.
You'd be surprised. I am SURE that that bus'ing happened already. Never mind the calculations; scum is foolish that way.zachattack wrote:If god gets bussed everyone who bussed him would lose.
Both. It may mean voting a buddy when it's clear the buddy won't be lynched, or it may mean actually pushing for a buddy's lynch.Bloodmoney wrote:DGB, for reference, do you mean bussing as lynching a scumpartner to appear innocent, or simply distancing?
Might he claim god on page 2?zwetschenwasser wrote:Exachitakely. God wants to be left alone, but once he gets seen as suspicious, he'll take the path of least resistance. It seems that Jebus, by following early suspicions of me, is a good God candidate.
He's god.zwetschenwasser wrote:Pacman is lurking like mad.
Their responses after I made the case for pacman being god.Jebus wrote:DGB - What was the reasoning behind your "These people are probably not God, and those possibly God?" list?
This is your mind on drugs.Double A wrote:Anyway... either Jebus or Zakerai is going to be our scapegoat. More than likely one if not both of them are agnostic.
I support this plan. The way it's done is by piling votes on pacman, not by asking politely if he wouldn't mind claiming, pretty please.zwetschenwasser wrote:I think we should get Pacman to claim, as he's not the newbie in this scenario.
What would be the motive for a culted player to act that way?mykonian wrote:problem is, I could see and culted player do this also. Otherwise, I agree.I wrote:That's EXACTLY what I'd expect someone to play God. WIFOM to some degree I know, but that kind of very nervous lurking in plain sight, and trying very hard to escape notice and not rock the boat.
So you're culted, and you're trying to distract people from god?zwetschenwasser wrote:To distract people from god.
Sorry, my brain wires got crossed.DrippingGoofball wrote:So you're culted, and you're trying to distract people from god?zwetschenwasser wrote:To distract people from god.
That means that there are a lot of players unwilling to lynch pacman-God already.Jebus wrote:The further into this game we play, the more likely God is to be caught - recruits as well as the CL's lose if god dies, so it is indeed a very finely balanced setup, assuming us agnostics play competently enough to pick out recruits/CL's.
Exactly. Mass claim is pointless. Or even claims, actually.Jebus wrote:Yes, but the only claims possible would sound like any of the following:
If I had played a game with any player that was this epically useless, I'd remember. Is there a player that's been here more than 6 months, with whom I haven't played? I wonder...Jahudo wrote:My meta question on pacman is still valid. Have you seen or played a game with him where he didn't lurk and avoid scumhunting?DrippingGoofball wrote:My case for pacman being Gos is still valid.
Are you making excuses for your false idol?zwetschenwasser wrote:Pacman does lurk alot.
Does it mean he's town? No.ortolan wrote:Is pacman's active lurking consistent with meta or wot???
Well if he's god, he has a great meta to hide behind.ortolan wrote:No, but it's the main point against him from what I see presently
He's 7, so it's hard for me to judge.zwetschenwasser wrote:What about doubleA, DGB?
You already claimed that for yourself.zwetschenwasser wrote:In other words, Bloodmoney is the Islam Cult Recruiter.
No, otherwise I'd be voting you.zwetschenwasser wrote:Did you miss the "it's a joke" part?
No, but there's a reason why he's active in this game, but not in others. Maybe I'm wrong about God lurking. Maybe he feels important, haha. And there's a reason why there's a constant low-grade level suspicion of Jebus. I'm starting to smell distancing.Bloodmoney wrote:Did God tell you to?DrippingGoofball wrote:Suddenly I want to lynch Jebus.unvote, vote: Jebus
Did you just call yourself scum?SilverPhoenix wrote:To add, not every scum action in every mafia game is a distancing act. That was the point of my vote on DGB.