Mini 736 - The Masonry Game Over!

[zwetschenwasser]

Yes.

[Max]

Wow, I return and make a post log out then an hour later Reecer votes for me, any explanations?

Zwet, from what I can tell from nightfall's play is that it isn't scummy, and definitely not vote worthy, is there any reason you feel the need to vote him other that your crap logic reasons.

[skitzer]

OK, alcove isn't as scummy anymore, Reecer is just being stupid, and zwet is slowly inching up on my radar, his recent play has been very antsy and panicky.

[Caboose]

I'm quickly losing patience with Reecer.
zwet's Nightfall vote reeks of OMGUS.

[Darox]

Votecount #8

Reecer6 (2) - Sebguer, RestFermata
zwetschenwasser (1) - Juls
Max (1) - Reecer6
Nightfall (1) - zwetschenwasser
Caboose (0)
alcove (0)
RestFermata (0)
Sebguer (0)
Juls (0)
skitzer (0)

Not Voting (5) - Caboose, Max, Nightfall, skitzer, alcove

10 alive, 6 to lynch, 5 to no-lynch
Dealine is Feb 24th

[zwetschenwasser]

Why Omgus? He didn't vote me. How is my play panicky? I do concise posts. Check my meta.

[Juls]

Check your meta? This is the first thing I see when I look at your meta

I'm scum. Lynch me now.

Looks like a sign to me!

[Reecer6]

Ummm, I'm not lurking.

[Caboose]

Why Omgus? He didn't vote me.

He doesn't have to. He asked you a simple question for you to explain why you use PRUFT (whatever that means) and he agreed with Juls in her 210 post. Then, you respond with a vote?

Not sitting well with me.

[Caboose]

And reecer continues to piss me off.

[Juls]

In two games with reecer, he is useless....I am just gonna vote him in both and hope others will join me because if he is going to be useless we might as well get rid of him.

Unvote. Vote: Reecer6

[zwetschenwasser]

The I'm scum thing is a ploy to get reactions. I still do concise posts. I don't understand Caboose's argument. Why did you switch to an annoying player when you can pressure a 'scummy' player, Juls?

[Juls]

Because I am in two games with him and he is really annoying me. He is a guy that tries to spoil games IMO.

[zwetschenwasser]

And you should vote him because...

[Nightfall]

It similar to how I used to play with Max when he first came here.
My first came with max the town lost because as A TOWNIE he claimed to be cop with a guilty result on someone he THOUGHT was scum. I then came forward as the real cop, with an innocent result on the same player. Even after my claim MAX continued pretending to be a cop and voted the innocent player, the other two players left in the game, the real two remaining scum jumped on and voted off my cleared investigation.
Scum won the game.

Stupid town play can be just as bad if not worse than scum players sometimes...

Should we ask Reecer for a claim? It's all WIFOM but I feel like we could be walking into a bit of a trap here. If Reecer isn't scum, I think the only reason that he's alive now is because scum thought for sure we'd lynch him today.

[Max]

Ah, those were the days, nowadays I restrict my use of gambits.

[RestFermata]

I can't stand players like that. It's a real headache dealing with them. I can just see it now: we lynch Reecer and he turns up town and congratulations, Reecer, your jackassery has just earned scum an effortless mislynch! Unfortunately, leaving him alive is a mistake because if he is scum, he can act however he wants and hammer whomever he wants because hey, he's not scummy, he's just dumb!

Either way it's stupid. I think we should just lynch him so we don't have to deal with this all game. I know it sounds bad, but I can't imagine having fun in this game with Reecer acting like this and everyone running around in circles yelling, "Do we lynch him? Do we leave him alive?" The thing is, I don't feel comfortable buying him a ticket to endgame just because he acts like an idiot. And I don't see his behavior changing anytime soon--so why not just kill him now? I say lynch Reecer today and maybe zwet tomorrow if nothing substantial changes.

[Max]

I disapprove of the "Reecer is going to harm town anyway" vibe I'm getting from rest's post just above. So I'm going to name one reason why we should not be lynching reecer today:

Because if he has a brain he will change his play style. If he doesn't we lynch him tomorrow.

[Nightfall]

Regardless of what we do, I want to hear more from Reecer than just

Ummm, I'm not lurking.

[alcove]

Reasons to lynch Reecer:

1. He's annoying
2. He's a liability, as proven yesterday
3. If the game becomes LyLo he needs to be gone by then.
4. If we're lucky, he's scum. I think that's unlikely, but only because what kind of scum announces that they have a night action? And seeing as it's Reecer we're talking about, that proves nothing.

Reasons not to lynch Reecer:

1. Lynch could be used more productively in actually catching scum


Suggestion:

Definitely do not quick-lynch Reecer. D1 ended too quickly and unproductively. It makes more sense to try to find other suspicious people besides the village idiot. Later, we can decide whether we have the luxury of a policy vote, albeit a really

satisfying

one.

Oh, and avoid placing people at L-1 if you do not actually want them lynched (i.e. you just want to "pressure them" *cough*notlikeI'mthinkingofanyonespecific*cough*), since Reecer might lynch them for you.


---


Why is zwets giving me empking deja vu? Something about the way his arguments make no sense...

[Juls]

Unvote. Vote: swets

I am not in as bad of a mood as I was yesterday so I am going to back off my lynch on sight mentality about Reecer...but I have to say, I am getting scummy feeling about RestFermata right now...your posts sure do seem like buddying to me....I can't put a tangible finger on it right now but I've got my eye on you.

[Juls]

EBWOP

Unvote. Vote zwets

mis-spelling.

[zwetschenwasser]

Whozawhat? You find RF suspicious and you vote for me.

[Juls]

Oh sweet zwets...nice try. I STILL find you suspicious for your L-1 vote. RF is giving off a scummy vibe but I am not voting for someone just on a hunch. However, you my dear are scummy.

[zwetschenwasser]

You're repeating the same statement without good backing.