Gieff wrote:It's true that you did in general, but not in the post I was talking about. You're right that your first accusation of fence-sitting is another original point, though. But it's somewhat irrelevant in that the reasoning you used at the time you voted for springlullaby was exactly what I had said in the previous post. You found another point, but this is only after you found a target based on another poster's reasoning.
Wait, so because I just tacked it on as an additional reason. This is proof you're tunneling me. You pretty much,, "This doesn't count because it refutes my point. You scummy" And on the Truly/honestly thing, this is just the way I speak. I speak like this in everyday conversation. I don't change my regular speech patterns in a mafia game.
Gieff wrote:It wasn't an IGMEOY, it was a VOTE, about which you said you were pretty sure it was a "huge scum slip." You are lying AGAIN. That was not just an IGMEOY, and it was not a minor thing, and when you say things like "huge scum slip" it looks pretty serious.
Read the exchange between me and Myko on page 3. Post 62-67 It was clearly not as serious as my natural speech made it sound. My last post in that exchange implied it was more of a IGMEOY Vote and not an "I want to lynch you right this second on page 3" vote.
Beyond_Birthday wrote:Meh...
I don't like some of the points being made against Panzer in this last post. Half of your argument seems to be reduced to a "random vote" that was claimed to have been, at the time of its posting, "not random" (by implication).
Unvote
I think this is by far the scummiest thing in the thread. When I look at this post, it reads: "Panzerwagon 09 as lost tremendous ammounts of momentum, blah blah blah blah. *hop of the wagon*"
GIEFF's attack on me saying random vote was deserved and honestly, I had to go check my role to see if I actually WAS scum. I need to pay a little more attention to what I'm saying, because he is right. It absolutely was not a random vote and I should have never(had I been paying attention) referred to it as one.
Unvote: Vote: Beyong_Birthday
This is a much better lead then SL. *Original point 4*(I've only Read up to 240, I'm catching up as I go posting on what is interesting)
Now on to 240, specifically the scum slip part of Goatrevolt's posted. I felt it was huge in terms of scum slips. It was one that slapped me across the face. It has nothing to do with whether or not scum slips are a big or little scum tell. In regards to "I don't see how a scum slip is a small thing" I believe I posted that page 2. Page 2, a scum slip IS a big deal. Page 9-10, less so. The reason scum slips are a weak tell is actually being largely displayed in this thread. First of, you can read a post several different ways. Second, the context of the post can change from your first look and your second look. Third, it could largely be semantics issues in which I think a lot of my "slips" That GIEFF has pointed out I believe are.
Zilla wrote:He's got no votes and I don't like his attitude.
Moreover, his logic also doesn't make sense, because the players are going to try to convince me in the past already anyway. It shouldn't make a difference if i'm reading old posts or new ones.
He's trying to stop a source of information, and that's not helpful at all to town. At the very least, it will be helpful to current players.
He's got a vote that needs explaining, also. He's the only one on MacCavityLock, and he should be explaining why he's there and where he stands on the top vote getters (something missing from the last few pages, at least).
Also, I tend not to gain much from reading things before my replacement. It helps to have a frame of reference and comparing things in retrospect, rather than being confused and not having anything to base the players on. I need something to add color and dimensionality to the players, because as I'm reading right now, I have nothing to really distinguish one poster from another.
The top of this post is a
BLATANT LIE
(bold for GIEFF to be proud). How is he trying to stop a source of information, your asking for a summary of past events and people's views on past events. No NEW info is coming from that, it's simply people restating old info which is already in the thread. It DOES make a difference to read the old ones, because you may find something we HAVEN'T in the old posts, new ones are just going to be bland summarys and(especially because you asked for post numbers) people telling you look here. You are simply trying to find the "juicy" passages where you can carve up someone and simply restate and paraphase some one else's case. The bottom really explains why the top is a lie. You want the new stuff because to you, stuff before you replace is old and new stuff(although it's explaining old stuff) is spicy and sexy. In short, The bottom says you want us to renew and restore old info and the top says Goatrevolt is cutting off us giving you brand New information.
LIES.
Zilla wrote:
You're campaigning pretty hard for a vote yourself. All those past votes are going to do exactly what any current post would do, but those past posts don't take into account that I am playing the game, and don't involve me on a personal level.
Your not asking to be involved in the game (you can involve yourself by reading the thread and posting opinions). Us giving you summaries of old stuff isn't gonna take you into account either, it's just gonna tell you look here. You are trying to find an easy place to stow away.
Unvote: Vote:Zilla FoS:Beying Birthday
This is far far scummier. then what BB has been doing but I want answers BB.
Sometimes a sandwich is just a sandwich.