I've read everything and I agree that Zwets looks most scummy.
Day 1, I didn't like his vote to get Empking to L-1.
This does not sound genuine to me and I don’t see how you can gamble on a player making another claim. I could understand putting someone to L-1 for reactions but you would need to make sure someone isn’t going to hammer because you need to wait and see those reactions. Reecer was a liability beforehand because he wanted to go to night (post 129).Zwets post 216 wrote:I didn't want to rush the lynch. I was attempting to get Empking to break down, admit he lied, and make another claim, which would have clinched that he was scum and BSing. Apparently this wasn't the case, and Reecer hammered for reasons unclear to me, but this seems more of a VI thing than scum.
Zwets knew full well that Reecer was a liability because he voted Reecer in post 134 and seemed to acknowledge that Reecer's attitude towards going to night quickly didn't seem to sit well with Zwets. So I don't understand why Zwets would put Empking to L-1 because he wanted a reaction, if Zwets also knew Reecer could quickhammer.
I also agree with Caboose's post 283 and RF's post 292 that Zwet's claim did not make him confirmed town. Empking's "Choosen One" flip should indicate that being mason-confirmed is a PR right, which goes against Zwets preemptive VT claim.
I also don't follow why Zwets unvoted in post 357 saying that Reecer is doing a protown thing, then jumps back on the wagon an hour later to hammer.