Normally that's a good idea but we have a lot of lurkers, and their non-votes or sticky votes are uninterpretable.Farkshinsoup wrote:There's too much reacting to what happened last night and what people posted today. We need to go back and start looking at voting patterns now. I don't have time to do that right now, but I might on the weekend.
Why "that" didn't look like a breadcrumb: because I don't believe in them.ortolan wrote:You couldn't be more scum if you tried. Again,please tell me why that didn't, to you, look like a breadcrumb, and why you failed to make your opinions known prior to Flameaxe being lynched. Complaining about the speed is perfectly crap when there were extremely valid reasons for voting Flameaxe, not least of which were his fucking self-vote and refusal to co-operate- including claiming. Not that there couldn't be scum on his wagon (and very, very likely are, based on probability alone), but pretending there was not an extremely valid reason for voting him and using that as an excuse to FoS *all* his wagoners is scummy in the extreme.
Hahaha, it may be wearing seven layers of spackle and makeup, you can still recognize it from the balcony seats!zwetschenwasser wrote:Enter WIFOM craplogic stage right...
M_K lynch sequence: LAUNCHEDMicrophone_Kirby wrote:Why I didn't give my opinions before Flameaxe's lynch:none of your business.
What? Someone who refused to claim, was supposedly breadcrumbed by the COP and didn't seem to mind his own lynch got lynched SO FAST?? What a disgrace!Microphone_Kirby wrote:Well... I'm a little surprised how f***ing fast Day Two went by: 4 (RL) Days out of 14? WTF!?!?
We seriously had plenty of time to discuss other potential targets, and then you all end the day like it was nothing??? NO. Not Good.
...Uh, not to me. It looked more like a "get your ass over here and post already" vote. That vote could've meant something else just as easily.ortolan wrote:Based on what you quoted in 522, DGB, I'm more inclined to think there was a guilty on Flameaxe than an innocent on OMGL.
Look at the "placeholder" vote, then the comment that there "might" be something more to it. Looks pretty damn strongly like a breadcrumb to me.
Vote: Flameaxe
raider8169 wrote:The case on flameaxe seems to only be based on him lurking. Is there something more to it?Struck out what shouldn't be. I highly doubt that Talitha checked out Flameaxe (Yesterday was a strong feeling, Today there's no doubt).sirdanilot wrote:Lurking
Breadcrumbed as scum day 2 by Talitha-COP.
Purposefully not defending himself
To me, the entire lynch was simply a lurker lynch... and a very unnecessarily speedy one.
Granted, Flameaxe Voting for himself and being uncooperative didn't help him in the least. Still... I don't like the speed of it at all.
Vote: sirdanilot, the first to mention that "Talitha checked out Flameaxe and got a guilty" was a possibility... that's what drove the Bandwagon, IMO. And I find it to be BS.
FoSthe other 450 Horsepower bandwagoners:Setanta, Slicey, Farkshinsoup, Riceballtail, Azhrei, DrippingGoofball, ortolan, Seraphim
die scum dieMK wrote:Why I didn't give my opinions before Flameaxe's lynch: none of your business.
Sigh. This is a jester tell, not a scumtell. What do we do now?Microphone_Kirby wrote:I tried Cooperative and it didn't do shit... so yes.zwetschenwasser wrote:Oi! What the heck is that supposed to mean, MK? Are you trying to be uncooperative?
This feels much better, TBH.
How could you be so pissed about the flameaxe wagon when you are now doing the same stuff he was doing?Microphone_Kirby wrote:I tried Cooperative and it didn't do shit... so yes.zwetschenwasser wrote:Oi! What the heck is that supposed to mean, MK? Are you trying to be uncooperative?
This feels much better, TBH.
hi mk-scum. are you mimicking flameaxe? because I couldn't see a towny doing that! oh wait you aren't a towny.Microphone_Kirby wrote:I tried Cooperative and it didn't do shit... so yes.zwetschenwasser wrote:Oi! What the heck is that supposed to mean, MK? Are you trying to be uncooperative?
This feels much better, TBH.
Explain what? I said all I could.raider8169 wrote:How could you be so pissed about the flameaxe wagon when you are now doing the same stuff he was doing?
Vote MK
I was hoping you would be using this time to explain yourself, guess not.
I doubt it in this case.zwetschenwasser wrote:There can be jesters in this game, right?
:goodposting:Azhrei wrote:Personally, I feel that OGML is by far the scummiest. He was hard on the M_K bandwagon, basically saying we were going to lynch him, and listing no alternative. And then, all of a sudden, he flipped, and voted for Santos. And his only comment being 'Brilliant claim, scum.
Hey Fark, I remember you. This is fishy.Farkshinsoup wrote:So you admit to lurking, staying on a wagon with a random vote (with no reason why your vote is on there) and then when you pick up a little flack, you admit that you're only trying to follow the pack. You unvote. Why did it take being challenged for you to decide that your vote was on a townie? The unvote also came as the Santos wagon was picking up steam, which you never got involved with one way or the other. Please explain.
??????? really looks like scum fail excuses "hai guys im know im scummy but not scum i swear"Pear Bear wrote:I understand that I'm looking realllllly scummy right now. My half-baked plan has basically blown up in my face. I was hoping that if I had kept my vote on MK he would be lynched and turn out to be scum, but towards the end of that process I began to doubt his scumminess. That combined with pressure to act in someway caused me to remove my vote. However, I didn't think that Santos was scum either, and that by being one of the few to not vote him I would assure my nonscumminess.
Ive made a newb mistake that could potentially end up killing me, and hurting the town.
Fail.
I was also extremely surprised that I wasnt on Plums list of suspects as he was the only person to vote me yesterday and now I look 1000x scummier than then.
And finally, I don't fully comprehend the hasty flameaxe voting...
ingore itzwetschenwasser wrote:What do we do now?
Microphone_Kirby wrote:Explain what? I said all I could.raider8169 wrote:How could you be so pissed about the flameaxe wagon when you are now doing the same stuff he was doing?
Vote MK
I was hoping you would be using this time to explain yourself, guess not.
ThisMK wrote:Why I didn't give my opinions before Flameaxe's lynch: none of your business.
Er Flameaxe seemed pretty much obv scum, what else was there to discuss, I don't think you can blame people for jumping on his wagon, like seriously.Microphone_Kirby wrote:Well... I'm a little surprised how f***ing fast Day Two went by: 4 (RL) Days out of 14? WTF!?!?
We seriously had plenty of time to discuss other potential targets, and then you all end the day like it was nothing??? NO. Not Good.
Highly unlikely, really. If she had a guilty on anyone it was flameaxe from her posting, it's obvious now she didn't though.Slicey wrote:Well, we obviously know now that Talitha did not get a guilty scan on Flameaxe. This gives me more reason to believe that she got a guilty scan on Az.
Why would you not have hammered? Sure the day was short, but dragging it out due to people being afraid of short days. If he'd been scum, then none of this would matter really. It was obvious Flameaxe had given up and wasn't going to post any more.Mk wrote:Was I around? Does it matter? If I was there, I still wouldn't have hammered him. Maybe later in the "day", but not anywhere near "yesterday's" hammer.
I disagree with this, I don't find it scummy, but I do disagree with the need to discuss tomorrow's lynch today, not needed at all.Seriously, how about trying to finding targets for "tomorrow's" lynch with that extra time? Maybe someone would slip up during the discussion, and those people would be a good point of focus for "tomorrow"... if they're not better candidates for the lynch "today".
As for the first bit, we could do with lynching scum alright.If we lynch another town, would we still have a chance of winning?
Because I'm fairly certain scum is intentionally keeping me around because I'm
A) Not helpful to the town.
B) A scapegoat to draw attention to when one of them is getting lynched.
Through the course of this game Ive suspected Flameaxe, Talitha and Plum, all turned out to be town. And I wasnt convinced Santos was scum, and I ended up being wrong.
Perhaps I should focus on those who I suspect the least...
Anyone that looks like a jester is probably scum. Unless you're flameaxe that is 
[/b]