Mini 738: The Town of Merrin - Game Over

[Beyond_Birthday]

EBWOP: In case that wasn't clear, it was a revote/confirm vote.

[GIEFF]

BB, can you explain why Zilla's attack is pathetic, and address her claim that you contradicted yourself?

[PJ.]

I dislike post 1282.

And I'm not going through 50 pages to prove something so obvious.

Unvote: Vote:Zilla

She bussed Qwints andhad me blocked.

I don't get it. You said SL has been scummy all game, and refuse to provide links, because it's so obvious? The last time you mentioned springlullaby was page 10.

I've been busy catching obv scum and defending myself and proving a point that long days and huge posts are bad.

[GIEFF]

OK, so take some time now to provide some links.

[PJ.]

I'm still proving a point.

[kloud1516]

Xtoxm replaces militant, effective immediately. Thank you so much!

Vote Count on the way.

[kloud1516]

Vote Count XVII

Zilla

(2): Panzerjager, Beyond_Birthday

springlullaby

(1): GIEFF

Not Voting:

Dourgrim, Zilla, Xtoxm, mykonian, springlullaby, SensFan

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch

Please notify me if there is a discrepancy in the list above

[Beyond_Birthday]

BB, can you explain why Zilla's attack is pathetic, and address her claim that you contradicted yourself?

I'm attacking her, and I fail to see the contradication. Just in case, I will reread it again; maybe I missed a word or some flow of logic. (Thought my statement was agreeing with an unexpressed obvious feeling of others.)

[Beyond_Birthday]

BB is voting me because scum protected me in game, which contradicts his stance on me earlier where I must have been scum for defending a townie.

Person A suspects person B for protecting person A despite A's admitted scumminess where Person A is town. New day, Person A now attacks Person B because Person C, who flipped scum, didn't join the bandwagon against B although he did join a bandwagon when D and A looked scummy... *hm... let me see... I can't find a contradiction in Person A's argument. So:

B's "contradiction" doesn't exist.

Post 1296 is nonsense and lacks any flow of logic or reason.

[GIEFF]

Agreed completely, BB - there was no contradiction. Do you see that, Zilla

And Panzer, please play the game again. What good does making a point about long days being bad for the town do?


Still waiting on Sensfan and springlullaby to respond.


And thanks for replacing, Xtoxm! Good luck reading everything...

[Zilla]

Contradiction is that he said I must have been scum because I didn't buy goat's case and didn't jump on him, so I must be scum because I was buddying up to a townie. Now when Qwints doesn't buy goat's case and doesn't jump on me, I must be scumbuddies with him.

Basically, when I didn't jump on him, it was scum trying to buddy to town. When Qwints didn't jump on me, it was scum protecting a partner.

[Xtoxm]

And thanks for replacing, Xtoxm!

Welcome!

Good luck reading everything...

Hehe, nice try Gieff! You know that's a vain hope though!

[kloud1516]

Bump.

[GIEFF]

Contradiction is that he said I must have been scum because I didn't buy goat's case and didn't jump on him, so I must be scum because I was buddying up to a townie. Now when Qwints doesn't buy goat's case and doesn't jump on me, I must be scumbuddies with him.

Basically, when I didn't jump on him, it was scum trying to buddy to town. When Qwints didn't jump on me, it was scum protecting a partner.

That is not a contradiction.

[Zilla]

He's using the same logic to say two different things. I didn't buy Goat's case on him, thus I'm scum defending a townie. Qwints didn't buy Goat's case on me, thus he must be scum defending scum. If the first case is valid for him, I don't understand why it isn't valid for me.

Cross referencing from yesterday, he may have been trying to get me lynched today after it didn't work yesterday. I still don't like how long it took him to vote Qwints. I don't like how he was scummy all day one, first by admission, then by tunneling, then by trying to not actually vote Qwints but appear to. I don't like how he's calling me scum on a double-standard.

I think we need to hear from Dour, Sens, Spring, Mykonian, and something of real substance from Panzer.

[mykonian]

yes, you should hear from me, but on the moment I'm not too motivated, and I need to be. I should give this a game a reread, while thinking about the deaths, but as I hope you all can understand, that would not be an easy thing to do. I tried yesterday, made it to page 10, when I gave up, and still had nothing really solid. I don't know why, but it can't be that there is nothing to find, so I'll have to do it again.

[Beyond_Birthday]

Contradiction is that he said I must have been scum because I didn't buy goat's case and didn't jump on him, so I must be scum because I was buddying up to a townie. Now when Qwints doesn't buy goat's case and doesn't jump on me, I must be scumbuddies with him.

Basically, when I didn't jump on him, it was scum trying to buddy to town. When Qwints didn't jump on me, it was scum protecting a partner.

People play differently. Seriously, do you think I hold everyone to the same standard?

Qwints scum play: Buddy up to partner.

Zilla scum play: Buddy up to town.

Which leads to....
Um... two different styles of play by two different people.

There is not contradiction.

[GIEFF]

And in both cases, B_B is calling the person DEFENDING scummy. Not the person being defended.

And Zilla, your defense of B_B was more an attack on Goat than a defense of B_B. You knew you wanted to call goat maf, and so to do that, you had to call B_B town.

[Zilla]

GIEFF, you're looking at it from the wrong angle. Birthday, you're ignoring the double-standard, either intentionally or inadvertantly, and it's looking intentional at this point.

[Xtoxm]

I've read through some stuffs. I've got a few ideas, but no solid scum reads yet. Just a check in post, really.

[GIEFF]

GIEFF, you're looking at it from the wrong angle. Birthday, you're ignoring the double-standard, either intentionally or inadvertantly, and it's looking intentional at this point.

I am not, and B_B is not. I will not respond to this anymore unless somebody besides Zilla thinks it really is a contradiction.

[Beyond_Birthday]

Indeed.^

[mykonian]

vote zilla

played a very aggressive antitown game.

[Dourgrim]

Zilla, you're either wrong or trying to mislead.

vote: Zilla

[GIEFF]

That is L-1 on Zilla. I am not against her lynch, and normally would be the 5th vote willing to hammer that would get her to claim, but we should wait until we hear from springlullaby, mykonian, SensFan, and Xtoxm.