Mini 746: Speed Dating - I've Had The Time Of My Life (Over)

[MonkeyMan576]

Monkey - surely that only applies if the case made is actually 100%

against scum

? It could be an amazing case, but scum could still jump on it, promote its wisdom, and lynch a townie.

Since we don't know, we can't be sure the alignment of those who jump on.

No, we don't know for sure, but when building a case for someone or against someone, surely you would want to avoid lynchking those who are consistantly voting town and lynch those who are consistantly voting scum, is my thinking.

Apparently, you've never heard of bussing.

I certainly have heard of it, but you don't want to base a strategy on something that's the exception rather than the rule. More often than not, townies vote town and scum vote scum.

Well, then. Shouldn't we be looking at people

not

on the zwet wagon by your logic?

I meant townies vote pro-town and scum vote pro-scum,

[molestargazer]

NOT POSTED SINCE MARCH 9

The Countess
jebus
BSG

MOD:
1. Happy birthday!
2. Can we get prods on the above?

[Jebus]

Sorry, prod recieved. I forgot about this game, though I'm still confused on what's going on in this game :/

[molestargazer]

Sorry, prod recieved. I forgot about this game, though I'm still confused on what's going on in this game :/

What confuses you about it?

[Max]

The Countess has a day to pick up her prod or she's being replaced

[DrippingGoofball]

I dunno guys - neko had already made night choices. I figured he knew what he was doing, so I didn't change them, though I had the option to do so.

[Caboose]

Hey, DGB.

[The Count]

Monkey - surely that only applies if the case made is actually 100%

against scum

? It could be an amazing case, but scum could still jump on it, promote its wisdom, and lynch a townie.

Since we don't know, we can't be sure the alignment of those who jump on.

No, we don't know for sure, but when building a case for someone or against someone, surely you would want to avoid lynchking those who are consistantly voting town and lynch those who are consistantly voting scum, is my thinking.

Apparently, you've never heard of bussing.

I certainly have heard of it, but you don't want to base a strategy on something that's the exception rather than the rule. More often than not, townies vote town and scum vote scum.

Well, then. Shouldn't we be looking at people

not

on the zwet wagon by your logic?

I meant townies vote pro-town and scum vote pro-scum,

Townies are uninformed. Therefore they aren't really pro-anybody, because, unless they have special powers that allow them to know the alignment of another player, they don't know anything. So they can vote pro-town, pro-scum, pro-duck.

Scum can vote pro-town too. It's called bussing. Stop playing dumb, scum!

[The Count]

The Countess has a day to pick up her prod or she's being replaced

I am so lonely without her. Hurry Max, hurry! There is no time! Hurry!

flashback

Countess: Why didn't you write me? Why? It wasn't over for me, I waited for you for seven years. But now it's too late.

I wrote you 365 letters. I wrote you everyday for a year.

Countess: You wrote me?

Yes... it wasn't over, it still isn't over

*cue romantic rain and music*

[MonkeyMan576]

Monkey - surely that only applies if the case made is actually 100%

against scum

? It could be an amazing case, but scum could still jump on it, promote its wisdom, and lynch a townie.

Since we don't know, we can't be sure the alignment of those who jump on.

No, we don't know for sure, but when building a case for someone or against someone, surely you would want to avoid lynchking those who are consistantly voting town and lynch those who are consistantly voting scum, is my thinking.

Apparently, you've never heard of bussing.

I certainly have heard of it, but you don't want to base a strategy on something that's the exception rather than the rule. More often than not, townies vote town and scum vote scum.

Well, then. Shouldn't we be looking at people

not

on the zwet wagon by your logic?

I meant townies vote pro-town and scum vote pro-scum,

Townies are uninformed. Therefore they aren't really pro-anybody, because, unless they have special powers that allow them to know the alignment of another player, they don't know anything. So they can vote pro-town, pro-scum, pro-duck.

Scum can vote pro-town too. It's called bussing. Stop playing dumb, scum!

So by your logic we should throw voting records completely out the window, huh?

[Max]

HI DGB!!!

[Caboose]

So by your logic we should throw voting records completely out the window, huh?

Yes.

Voting records doesn't clear nor condemn anybody. It has little to do with the vote itself and everything to do with how and when the vote is cast.

[MonkeyMan576]

So by your logic we should throw voting records completely out the window, huh?

Yes.

Voting records doesn't clear nor condemn anybody. It has little to do with the vote itself and everything to do with how and when the vote is cast.

Well I disagree with that fundamentally.

[Nightfall]

So by your logic we should throw voting records completely out the window, huh?

Yes.

Voting records doesn't clear nor condemn anybody. It has little to do with the vote itself and everything to do with how and when the vote is cast.

You're saying the who and the why don't mater to you?

[molestargazer]

I would assume the why and who come under 'how' the vote is cast.

[Kmd4390]

I'm back. What have I missed? And why is DGB here?

(I need to catch up still.)

[molestargazer]

I think DGB's post was a balls-up.
You've not missed a great deal, activity's through the floor right now.

[Max]

DGB is replacing BSG, which is good for us.

[DrippingGoofball]

OK guys who are we lynching?

[DrippingGoofball]

Vote Zwet

for speaking French.

Si je parle en Français, tu votes pour moi alors?

[DrippingGoofball]

We're on page 18? Can someone point me to zwet's fakeclaim?

[Max]

Table 1: DGB and The Count
Table 2: roffman and monkeyman576
Table 3: Kmd4390 and molestargazer
Table 4: Caboose and Jebus
Table 5: The Countess and Nightfall

kmd4390 (2): Roffman, Monkeyman576
Monkeyman576 (1): The Count
The Count (1): Kmd4390

[Max]

Sorry, but no flavour with the above text. The next rotate line was 27th Mar. Instead it'll be 1st April to give you discussion, also note that I will be maiming and slaughtering anyone who does not start posting. I.E. replace them

[DrippingGoofball]

vote: kmd4390

Wagon-ho!!!

[molestargazer]

We're on page 18? Can someone point me to zwet's fakeclaim?

This the one you're talking about?