Vengeful Mafia I - GAME OVER

Battousai · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:55 am

Why does charter have 2 votes?

SensFan · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:57 am

I didn't defend Batt.

SensFan · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:58 am

Vote: charter

Just because he only has 2 votes, and I'm not willing to hammer charter this early.

Battousai · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:58 am

I agree, he acted the same with 2 votes on Pacman. He just elevated it to more suspicion on Charter for continuing the bad play.

SensFan · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:58 am

SensFan wrote:
Vote: charter

Just because he
only
already has 2 votes, and I'm not willing to hammer charter this early.

pacman281292 · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:59 am

no he doesn't (or as VC says)...

charter · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:59 am

Battousai wrote:I agree, he acted the same with 2 votes on Pacman. He just elevated it to more suspicion on Charter for continuing the bad play.

No he didnt. He was voting pac too.

SensFan · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:00 pm

pacman281292 wrote:no he doesn't (or as VC says)...

Oh, nevermind. Misunderstood Batt's post.

Vote: charter

SensFan · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:00 pm

charter wrote:
Battousai wrote:I agree, he acted the same with 2 votes on Pacman. He just elevated it to more suspicion on Charter for continuing the bad play.
No he didnt. He was voting pac too.

I wasn't condoning a hammer, though.

charter · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:01 pm

Didn't say you were.

Battousai · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:01 pm

He was also voting me. But you were the one putting us at L-1 and called for the hammer.

SensFan · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:01 pm

You are being obviously and blatantly scummy.

I'm not someone who accepts the "I'm being scummy on purpose" defense.

Battousai · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:03 pm

Replacement for Knox? Hasn't posted in over 10 minutes.

knox · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:03 pm

Still here FoS Charter but not ready for lynch

SensFan · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:04 pm

Unvote, Vote: knox

charter · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:04 pm

Was playing mtg with xtoxm, done now so I can post.

Battousai · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:05 pm

Vote: Knox

Most likely to be mafia godfather. Trying to avoid the vengeful kill.

pacman281292 · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:05 pm

@knox:

pacman281292 wrote:no he doesn't (or as VC says)...

Battousai · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:06 pm

Pacman- elaborate please, I don't understand what you are getting at with that quote.

knox · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:06 pm

pacman281292 wrote:@knox:
pacman281292 wrote:no he doesn't (or as VC says)...

What does that mean?

charter · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:08 pm

I could vote knox.

pacman281292 · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:08 pm

knox wrote:
pacman281292 wrote:@knox:
pacman281292 wrote:no he doesn't (or as VC says)...
What does that mean?

charter is not at l-1, so no hammah there.

SensFan · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:08 pm

I support a knox hammer, with a charter Veng.

knox · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:09 pm

pacman281292 wrote:
knox wrote:
pacman281292 wrote:@knox:
pacman281292 wrote:no he doesn't (or as VC says)...
What does that mean?
charter is not at l-1, so no hammah there.

Oh I thought he was,

Vote count please

Battousai · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:10 pm

VC- votecount... I get it now lol.