Mini 738: The Town of Merrin - Game Over

SensFan · Post Post #1450 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:16 pm

That snippet would be enough for me to vote you in a 3p LyLo scenario, all other facts being equal.

springlullaby · Post Post #1451 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:19 pm

You are dumb to vote without explanation.

Anyway, I'm at L-2. If you don't want me to claim, you unvote me.

SensFan · Post Post #1452 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:22 pm

springlullaby wrote:You are dumb to vote without explanation.

I guess I was also dumb to hammer Zilla without expla-oh wait...

springlullaby wrote:Anyway, I'm at L-2. If you don't want me to claim, you unvote me.

Unvote SL.

Vote: SL

GIEFF · Post Post #1453 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:29 pm

Unvote SL

We should wait for Panzer's results before doing anything rash.

GIEFF · Post Post #1454 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:30 pm

springlullaby wrote:I've answered the first question once already.

Please answer it again. I don't see where you answered it. Why did Zilla replacing dejkha warrant an unvote?

Why did you say it was scummy when B_B refused to claim, but did not mention Zilla's refusal to do so?

springlullaby · Post Post #1455 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:55 pm

SensFan wrote:
springlullaby wrote:You are dumb to vote without explanation.
I guess I was also dumb to hammer Zilla without expla-oh wait...

springlullaby wrote:Anyway, I'm at L-2. If you don't want me to claim, you unvote me.

Unvote SL.

Vote: SL

1. You are saying now that your hammer wasn't accidental but you may as well be one dumb scum who though he was putting a middle wagon bussing vote.

2. And yes, that is exactly why any unjustified vote is dumb.

3. Please don't feel too special, my 'you' was a you at large.

You are still not justifying why 'that snippet' would make me scum.

GIEFF wrote:Please answer it again. I don't see where you answered it. Why did Zilla replacing dejkha warrant an unvote?

Why did you say it was scummy when B_B refused to claim, but did not mention Zilla's refusal to do so?

spring wrote:On Zilla, the bravado with which she made her entry and the fact that she has been actively pissing people off doesn't read like scum to me. Also I don't see her doing the flipflop she had going on Goat if she were scum, I think town uncertainty is more likely.

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 46#1510946

On the Beyond claim thing, I forgot why I said that. I think it's me getting confused when I reiterated my reasons to vote BB. There was something to do with claim that I didn't like in Beyond.

GIEFF · Post Post #1456 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:05 pm

I asked why you unvoted dejkha, and the reason you gave was based on behavior Zilla did after this unvote.

At the time you unvoted dejkha, why did you do it? And why didn't you answer when Goat asked you the same question back then?

mykonian · Post Post #1457 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:51 pm

springlullaby wrote:You are dumb to vote without explanation.

Anyway, I'm at L-2. If you don't want me to claim, you unvote me.

Is it dumb to vote for someone that admittantly doesn't want to play?

If you admittantly aren't interested enough to hunt scum, doesn't that mean that you don't need to hunt for them?

springlullaby · Post Post #1458 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:17 pm

GIEFF wrote:I asked why you unvoted dejkha, and the reason you gave was based on behavior Zilla did after this unvote.

At the time you unvoted dejkha, why did you do it? And why didn't you answer when Goat asked you the same question back then?

What are you talking about. I unvoted djekha when Zilla replaced in. I did so because I thought her entrance and the way she pissed people off was town. I told Goat that I would answer him later because I didn't want to 1)influence his comportment at a time he was making a case against her 2)answer on Zilla's behalf.

myk wrote:Is it dumb to vote for someone that admittantly doesn't want to play?

If you admittantly aren't interested enough to hunt scum, doesn't that mean that you don't need to hunt for them?

Where exactly did I say that I didn't want to play?

Where did I say that I didn't want to hunt scum?

mykonian · Post Post #1459 (ISO) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:52 pm

springlullaby wrote:Gieff, your case sucks. I could eat holes in it, but I won't because I'm on minimum effort this game. Look elsewhere.

minimal effort means: no reaction on cases on you and barely reading the thread. Then it is impossible to hunt scum.

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #1460 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:53 am

I am voting you for your response to Gieff which greatly indicates: I'm not going to respond. I admitted my position was bad, an acknowledgment. You are slightly hinting at a blind faith belief that you're not scum. This is invalid, so I voted you.

springlullaby · Post Post #1461 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:58 pm

So you don't believe I was justified in not responding to GIEFF? Then you'll have to make very clear every point in his case with which you agree.

mykonian · Post Post #1462 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:01 pm

since when are you ever justified in not responding, while your reason clearly is that the game is not interesting enough?

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #1463 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:42 pm

So, you want me to agree with a specific point with Gieff so you can ignore that too? No.

PJ. · Post Post #1464 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:35 pm

WHOA Everyone UNVOTE SL Immediately.

GIEFF · Post Post #1465 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:34 pm

Why would you not put your cop results in your first post, Panzer?

mykonian · Post Post #1466 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:15 am

GIEFF, would you stop attacking confirmed (ok, ok, almost confirmed) players? As long as we have the idea not to go for a quicklynch, there would never be a problem. We should wait for Panzer, and in that time, he can use his extra information to find scum.

It isn't that hard...

kloud1516 · Post Post #1467 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:05 am

Bump. I have to run, but when I get back I will put up the latest vote count.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1468 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:28 am

Sounds like Panz has a inno on SL, but she could be a GF.

I doubt Zilla was bussed, especially with how quick the wagon formed.

Only me, Gieff, SL were not on the wagon so:

Vote SL

mykonian · Post Post #1469 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:56 am

this way, even after you think Panz has an inno, you still vote her? Xtoxm, you don't make sense...

GIEFF · Post Post #1470 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:19 am

I am not attacking Panzer, I'm wondering why he's making us wait so long to hear his results. It's pissing me off.

And I agree with Xtoxm that even an innocent-result is not necessarily inno - the probability of an investigation-immune mafia (or sk) is high.

But I would like to hear why Panzer hasn't told us his result, and why he wants everybody to unvote SL.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1471 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:22 am

Because he's being a dick?

mykonian · Post Post #1472 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:23 am

Waiting is indeed long. Esspecially because I have the feeling Panzer doesn't check this thread often.

mykonian · Post Post #1473 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:13 am

GIEFF wrote:And I agree with Xtoxm that even an innocent-result is not necessarily inno - the probability of an investigation-immune mafia (or sk) is high.

thought it over, and maybe you are right. We got: one mafia blocker, one framer, and one cop. Probably a doctor, because a town blocker is highly unprobable, and a no kill? would be weird.

That leaves us with a cop and a doc in play, something that, while used, is not adviced as it can make the game pretty boring. We should still play the game, something I stopped doing a bit. (sorry

). Follow the cop is probably not that good an idea, maybe some investigation immune person sneaks through.

springlullaby · Post Post #1474 (ISO) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:17 am

Ok, you guy are dumb hardcore.

Claim, vig. Targetted ting N1, no kill N2. Start of breadcrumd D1 before my losing interest in the game: find 'fant' crumbed in mispelling of my nick in quote. 'fant' is the start of 'fantomette' which means vig because of this thread: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 48#1303948

I may go back and dig the crumbing up if I feel you lot deserve it.

Vote Xtoxm

If Xtoxm is not lynched off today, I'm vigging him.
1. For that dumb lame vote on me.
2. For refusing to read the game.