OK, look: it's early in Day One of the game. I proposed a theory that I believe has merit, and I used my ONE VOTE to apply pressure in support of that theory. I haven't at ALL tried to "push a lynch without further investigation." Matter of fact, as far as I can tell, this IS the "further investigation" you're looking for right here. You still haven't refuted my comment about your wishy-washy stance before... you actually gave me a "fair enough," which seems to mean that you're conceding the point and agree with my assessment. How does that equate with me pushing a lynch without further investigation?magnus_orion wrote:No.
Its yourjobto try andproveits validity, not convince players that its already there.
In other words, its your job to try toverifythat your theory holds, not push it to a lynch without further investigation.
Its only your job to try and convince other players of its validity without trying to verify it if you're scum.
You removed the emphasis I placed on the word "you" above in my original post, which changes the meaning of the post entirely. My point was that I'm learning about you and your playstyle with this conversation, and that learning is independent of the specific facts of the case and your opinion of those facts. Does that make more sense?magnus_orion wrote:What's this here for? Do you believe there is reason for me to find your suspicions invalid? I in fact praised you for suspecting me for what you did. Unfortunately, the way you went about doing it I found to be scummy.dourgrim wrote:whether you believe the suspicion to be valid or not.
This:magnus_orion wrote:Yes, everyone has bias.
Did I dispute this?
Why are you bringing this up?
You referenced bias above, and I was refuting your claim that bias itself is a scumtell by stating that everyone has bias. That's all.magnus_orion wrote:Then why is being "apologetic" and admitting your own personal bias (Ie. My opinion) an additional scumtell to the backpedeling, according to you? (Hence the words "In addition...")
-----------
This pisses me off. It's a VERY thinly-veiled reference to something else current on the site, and B_B, you should know better. That's a MAJOR no-no.Beyond_Birthday wrote:Dourgrim's play in this game also bothers me, but I'm afraid I must wait before I can say anymore on this.
-----------
Isacc: I'll try to answer your questions today... and I owe somebody an analysis on Nocmen as well. Yeesh, you guys are needy on Day One.