I meant to do this a few days ago but
Unvote
Vote: Gorrad
Gorrad (128) wrote:...HA! Lawrencelot pulled a Space Monkey on us! I completely fell for it, too. I thought I was scum.
Mod: NICE one
As much as I hate to say it, Zwet's in the clear this game. Mafia would know that the Army was the uninformed and therefore NOT make that slip. Town that thought they were scum? That's right up their alley.
Unvote, Vote: AceMarksman
FoS: Shinnen_no_Me
This came across as unconvincing. I strongly suspected from the get-go I was actually town rather than a traitor role- there's several indications that this is the case. I also don't understand your thought process in voting/FoSing these players. You don't think zwet is scum because scum would know that the bad guys are the uninformed majority, but how does this make them scummy for voting for him?
And I don't like the fishing in 135:
Gorrad (135) wrote:AceMarksman wrote:More clarification: the mario game I spend most of my time on is Galaxy, and my role has an older baddie in it which doesn't get much facetime in Galaxy I'm afraid.
A quick glance at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_enemies combined with my own knowledge of Galaxy, means that there are only a handful of roles that fit. I still don't buy it.
The only reason it would be useful to further discuss his role would be if his lynch was likely and it was claim time. His lynch wasn't going to happen at that point in time though. I also don't like how sure of yourself you seem here when his "mistake" wasn't necessarily scummy.
Gorrad (139) wrote:I thought I was scum, as my role was a Mario Baddy. I was wrong. I expect most townies to, like me, not have understood at first that they were town due to Bowser's Army traditionally being the bad guys. Therefore I suspect you and Ace, as y'all assumed that every townie knew they were such, despite the fact that the flavor is counter-intuitive.
To clarify why I thought I was scum despite being uninformed, I basically thought I was a traitor-type role. AKA one with a scum win condition who is uninformed.
How do you know they couldn't have inferred or simply queried with the mod whether they were in fact town? And if you assume that the Mushroom Kingdom know they're the informed majority, why might they not also be informed of the fact that Bowser's Army don't actually know that they are town to begin with? If this is the case then is potentially a point
for
AM and Shinnen being town.
Shinnen (146) wrote:Exactly. The town will always (or well, who knows, so let's say usually) be the uninformed majority. The flavour has nothing to do with this. However, I want to believe for now that Gorrad really thought that he was one of the bad guys. In the other hand, Zwet's slip is just too big to ignore. However, taking into account the item list the mod posted, there's also a chance that he belongs to a third party, thus why the surprise. One way or another, I'm happy with my vote.
I don't like this either. Seems like she's trying to avoid stepping on Gorrad's toes while aiming for zwet the easy target.
caf (147) wrote:We can assume that scum would know that Bowser's army is town and so wouldn't make any obvious mistakes, but assuming there is a DK and a Wario in the game they could still have been caught out by it. Therefore I dont think we can wholly confirm Zwet at this point.
I would assume the scum know at least as much as the town do, including how much knowledge town have about whether they're really town or not.
Empking's vote on Gorrad is well-justified (it's for similar reasons to mine really).
Moratorium (167) wrote:Also, I have this creepy feeling that we wake up Day 2 and find out that this isn't Scum-is-Town and Town-is-Scum, but instead this is just some quasi-random "Day 1 with the lights out!" and suddenly we all recognize each other again and only then does the true informed minority get established with more role PM's and whatever...
After having just outed ourselves voluntarily on Day 1.
Nightmare scenarios. Sad
Not sure I like this too much. A game where our factions/win cons changed entirely after day 1 is bastard modish and also renders the entirety of day 1 pointless or an exercise in culling a few extra people before the proper start of the game. Our abilities are "interesting" though
Gorrad (171) wrote:Y'see, this is what I have against Ace. He wasn't at all confused by his role, and automatically assumed no one else would be. AND he didn't recognise his role, supposedly, as a Mario baddy. Personally, I find that nigh-impossible unless he has a named villain (I find this unlikely due to the deaths of most of said named villains in MKMI, AKA Bowser, Baby Bowser, and Drybones. There aren't many left).
I still really dislike Gorrad's attempts to pin people as scum based on "role behaviour". Again I've no doubt the scum would be well-warned in advance of how to fit in and act townie- it would simply be unbalanced otherwise. This makes me more suspicious of Gorrad actually.
pt (178) wrote:Wait a second.
We have items that only Bowser's Army know how they work.
Can we massively confirm people with this?
I highly doubt it. No practical way of doing it, game-breaking so presumably the mod has measures against it etc.
SK (184) wrote: I would say we can possibly confirm 4 people.
True. By paraphrasing the effects. Technically we would do something really lame like "what is the seventh letter in the description for this item" but I don't think that will be treated kindly by the mod,
amirite, mod?
Moratorium (190) wrote:So is the assumption here that basically Law didn't put anything in the scum role pm's that says "Hey, by the way, in case town tries this tactic, here's the list of items that town can buy and their powers"?
(started taking a shower, and this thought came to me)
Very good point which I thought of as well. The interesting thing about this, though, is that (possibly
) at least one of the items seems to be rendered useless or at least much less useful if one's enemy knows what it does (which
may
suggest they can't know what our items do).
AM (194) wrote:No, because there are some roles, like mine, that aren't allowed to buy items.
ok, scratch that then.
caf (195) wrote:Item questioning seems like a good tactic currently, if we can think up enough questions to make it work. Even if we do end up with a few players claiming not to have been given knowledge of the items, we can just separate them off first and then question everyone else. It's probably not enough to nail scum on its own but it'll give us info.
Nah I'm actually getting increasingly against this idea. If scum
do
know what the items do already then we're heavily shooting ourselves in the foot. I'm convinced Lawrencealot wouldn't allow us to catch scum in this manner.
Agree with Shinnen's 203.
Gorrad (204) wrote:I'm fine with item claims to reduce the pool somewhat. However, as I too cannot purchase items (and therefore do not know what they do), I'm willing to
Unvote: Ace
. I don't think that scum would know that there were roles that had that particular twist.
Second to claim this after someone's already cleared the way = still consistent with being scum.
populartajo (236) wrote:Its a risk we should take.
But do you think we wont find scum in this exercise?
This is the second time tajo has role/itemfished, and in a different manner to the first time. Strongly considering moving my vote back onto him.
I am not telling you whether I have item descriptions or not.
SK (260) wrote:I'm guessing that the presence of the fireflower and barrel cannon mean that the scum have to *buy* their ability to kill. I have no idea what the motorcycle could be as I've never played any Wario games. The banana could be a roleblock power (that's all I can think of that a banana would do). The mushroom might make the scum harder to kill (like you had to get hit twice as super mario to die). The 1-up could create some kind of resurrection, so we had better watch the endgame. It would suck if we were at lylo and mario resurrected luigi who got lynched day 2. The only thing I've come up with for the star is invulnerability.
A lot of this (especially the first sentence) don't follow at all to me.