Open 135 - Polygamist Mafia, Incomplete/Mod Error before 775

Wall-E · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:17 am

If we haven't decided who to lynch by the 29th nobody will die. Are we OK with that? It would only essentially reset the votes.

Personally, I like days to go on forever. And ever. And ever.

But that's just me.

AceMarksman · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:18 am

no, days going on and on and on are not good, the town talks it's self out of good ideas.

then again, this game is nightless...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:23 am

*facepalm*

Wall-E · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:26 am

AceMarksman wrote:no, days going on and on and on are not good, the town talks it's self out of good ideas.

then again, this game is nightless...

This is rhetoric. Can you link me to a game where the town talked itself out of a good idea? If not, please keep your unfounded opinions to yourself.

mykonian · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:29 am

I have one. A pity they talked themselves into a good idea again... it was a 53 page day 1

Wall-E · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:35 am

Is it the exception or the rule? Your example (though we haven't actually seen it) seems to indicate it's the rule that longer days help the town.

Are we going to follow my plan? Everyone claims one person who isn't their lover? It will work very well so long as the rules are followed:

Rule 1: Everyone must claim one person who is not their lover.
Rule 2: No two players may claim that the same player is not their lover.

AceMarksman · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:55 am

I can buy this, but what information will we get from it?

mykonian · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:56 am

you can't see what the rule is, based on one game.

ok, whatever you want. Looker is not my lover.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:56 am

I think it's the exception.

AceMarksman · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:59 am

Might as well. Archon is not my lover.

AceMarksman · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:40 am

who is gonna claim next?

claimed

Mykonian: not lovers with looker
AceMarksman: not lovers with archon

Archon · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:01 pm

AceMarksman wrote:who is gonna claim next?

claimed

Mykonian: not lovers with looker
AceMarksman: not lovers with archon

lol. could you do anyone even more obviously not your lover?

AceMarksman · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:25 pm

No, but I might as well claim it

Looker · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:43 pm

tenchi <3<3<3 is not my lover...unfortunately...

...

Tenchi · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:56 pm

Ortolan is not my baby.

AceMarksman · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:08 pm

AceMarksman wrote:who is gonna claim next?

claimed

Mykonian: not lovers with looker
AceMarksman: not lovers with archon
Looker:Not lovers with tenchi
Tenchi: not lovers with ortolan

Tenchi · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:16 pm

AceMarksman wrote:
AceMarksman wrote:who is gonna claim next?

claimed

Mykonian: not lovers with looker
AceMarksman: not lovers with archon
Looker:Not lovers with tenchi
Tenchi: not lovers with ortolan

Ace: Can we be fair about this whole thing? I mean its pretty obvious you cannot be in a threesome with Archon.

Claim somebody else.

Tenchi · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:19 pm

AceMarksman wrote:no, days going on and on and on are not good, the town talks it's self out of good ideas.

then again, this game is nightless...

Well we can go here...

But I do think we have a shot of winning this. We just have to start talking.

Tenchi · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:20 pm

EBWOP: We can go here...

Wall-E · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:31 pm

Tenchi wrote:
AceMarksman wrote:
AceMarksman wrote:who is gonna claim next?

claimed

Mykonian: not lovers with Looker
AceMarksman: not lovers with Archon
Looker:Not lovers with Tenchi
Tenchi: not lovers with ortolan
Wall-E: not lovers with AceMarksman
Ace: Can we be fair about this whole thing? I mean its pretty obvious you cannot be in a threesome with Archon.

Claim somebody else.

Pause. Do we want Ace to claim again?

No.

Don't claim someone new.

The remaining options for those who have not claimed yet:

mykonian
Gregory
Jazzmyn
PieIsPopcorn
sekinj
Seraphim
Wall-E
zwetschenwasser

Others need to claim NOT their lover. Make sure that you all say the word NOT so as to keep people jumping back into the thread after a long absence from claiming their ACTUAL lover by mistake. Also to keep scum from trying this and using the slip as an excuse to do so.

Wall-E · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:32 pm

EBWOP: I believe that I threw the mod's name in by mistake. I was reading the names off the scrolltab at the bottom of the thread.

AceMarksman · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:43 pm

Well I'll claim not lovers with Seraphim too

. Sorry mod, you're not my type.

Tenchi · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:45 pm

Wall-E wrote: Pause. Do we want Ace to claim again?

No.

Don't claim someone new.

I was trying to be fair here. But I have no problems if nobody else wants him to claim a new one.

Wall-E · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:14 pm

Life's not fair, kiddo.

Gregory · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:19 pm

I don't get the freaking idea of this, but lets just do it

me is not lover with Jazz