WeyounsLastClone wrote:I'm currently reading the thread. But I'm best man at a wedding coming Thursday, and still have loads of things to arrange, so I don't know when I can come with a decent analysis.
I am very skeptical of the plan. I don't know if it's as good as you are making it out to be, though I can't know for sure until everyone either admits to having items or not (or refuses to cooperate) and you reveal the next step of the plan. I disagree with the potential ways I see the plan going next, it could be that I just haven't thought of everything though. I trust your intentions, but I don't yet trust the plan until I actually know what the plan is.
I'm such a good lover because I practice a lot on my own.
Right now most of the focus of this game is all around this plan. In order to move on we need to get past the stage of people complying or refusing to go along. Me trying to further the game by reposting your list to get the last few people on (or off) board will get us past what has become in the past few days pretty stagnant discussion.
I'm such a good lover because I practice a lot on my own.
Got to page 11 with reading. At this point I suspect AceMarksman the most. I do think tajo's claiming proposition was kinda bad, but the way AceMarksman responded was a bit scummier in my opinion. Also, he was immediately claiming not to be able to buy items, which seems more like an excuse to not be tested somehow. I won't vote yet, as I didn't read pages 11 to 16, but will get back after that.
Also, wouldn't it be possible to have multiple uninformed groups? The way things are switched here, and with four parties, anything might be possible.
I myself have item descriptions, 2 generic, and 4 for Bowser's Army. Maybe there's something we can do with the coins the items cost?
I really don't have time anymore now, hope to be back with some more tomorrow.
Given that Rice is refusing to comply without knowing more, and she's (probably) not going to be told more as that might weaken the plan, I guess we should probably just put her in the "refusing to" column. Which means we're just waiting on Cream now.
Cream147 said he was going to catch up yesterday. He hasn't.
Vote: Cream147
Not a whole lot of content from him and is currently the only one delaying moving past this part of the plan and hence keeping the game from moving forward.
I'm such a good lover because I practice a lot on my own.
What made you change your mind about refusing to share whether you had knowledge of Bowser's Castle items to now saying that you don't have the item descriptions?
I'm such a good lover because I practice a lot on my own.
I really don't like zwets post - why would scum gambit and say they didn't have descriptions - wouldn't saying they didn't have b.a. descriptions correct?
By convincing the town that power roles might not have item descriptions the whole scum team might be trying to coast through the whole game as item-free powerroles.
UW Huskies Class of 2014!
Spontaneous Bastard Mafia II is accepting replacements.
Games Won..
Mini 545 as town.
Mini 578 as scum.
mini 618 as scum.
Mushroom Kingdom as town.
Monty pythons as town.
mini 642 bodyguard 7 as town
Explosive mafia - as scum
mini 712 -town
zwetschenwasser wrote:I'd propose lynching one of the claimed no-buyers to see if they're all gambiting scum or real power roles. Empking would work nicely for this.
opportunistic. You're just voting based on the most recent potentially-voteworthy event that happened. You vote Surye for a perceived slip, no-one follows you, you switch to one of the no-item-claimers as the massitemclaim is nearing completion. Also, what made you pick Empking?