MKM II GAME OVER

[killa seven]

Im catching up, been busy.

Mod edit
Visible Votecount

-ortolan (5): populartajo, Shadow Knight, AceMarksman, zwetschenwasser, Gorrad
-Shadow Knight (4): Moratorium, ortolan, Looker, qwints
-Looker (2): Riceballtail, caf19
-Gorrad (1): Empking

Not voting (5): killa seven, WeyounsLastClone, Cream147, semioldguy, ZEEnon

With 17 alive it takes 9 real votes to lynch. Deadline: May 4th 2009.

[ortolan]

surprise surprise

[caf19]

Seeing as we're approaching deadline and I seem to have 5 votes on me, you may ask me a question about the items, I do in fact have the descriptions and have no intention of being another deadline lynch driven by scum as per Election Mafia.

How many of the items might end up getting used on a different person to the one you originally send them to/use them on?

[ortolan]

two

[Shadow Knight]

@Whomever- how would you like me to explain? Sometimes, the little hairs on the back of my nect stand up when I read something. And considering that ortolan hasn't posted any porn, he's my vote at present.

[Empking]

Is Ort right?

[populartajo]

Seeing as we're approaching deadline and I seem to have 5 votes on me, you may ask me a question about the items, I do in fact have the descriptions and have no intention of being another deadline lynch driven by scum as per Election Mafia. I will note that populartajo has effectively prevented any genuine attempt at scum-hunting today with his "plan".

Ive already said that my plan doesnt prevent scumhunting AT ALL.
There are tons of reactions to analyse and in fact there are already some people voting some people for reactions to this plan.
So, nice lie.

[populartajo]

I will also note that if populartajo continues to suspect me after I correctly answer a question about the items, this will amount to an acknowledgement that his plan was useless to begin with (because this will imply that, I, as scum, in fact do have the descriptions, and this method is totally ineffective at distinguishing town from scum).

Hey, Einstein, if you have a correct answer that doesnt mean Im scum. That means that you also have item descriptions in your PM. And therefore the plan IS NOT useless as its likely to prevent your lynch.
Fail x2.

[populartajo]

Ort, how about you answer this question.

This is strange because in my PM, it explicetely says that the bomb triggers when a)this item is traded "x" times. and b)a reason I dont think scum should know.

What is the value of "x"?

[Moratorium]

If ever there was a question I don't want to see the answer to posted in thread, it's "what is the value of "x"?.

Come on, man.

[populartajo]

Kay, kay but I really dont think scum will be eager to play with bombs now that they know it triggers in a definitine number of iterations.

Think in another one.

[semioldguy]

Vote: Shadow Knight

I think we are chasing the wrong person with ortolan here. He never did claim to have no item descriptions as far as I can tell by going though his posts, yet was put into that category. The fact that Shadow Knight has jumped on him though seems suspicious to me. If one of the two of them is scum, I think Shadow Knight is the more likely candidate.

Off Topic: Gorrad, you're from San Diego too? (Surye is also for that matter before he replaced out). Not very sunny here today though

[Moratorium]

Im catching up, been busy.

Btw, is K7 the original zwets? Are they cousins? Or maybe Zwets signed on to some sort of K7 apprenticeship program?

[WeyounsLastClone]

Ort, how about you answer this question.

This is strange because in my PM, it explicetely says that the bomb triggers when a)this item is traded "x" times. and b)a reason I dont think scum should know.

What is the value of "x"?

I know Moratorium already mentioned it, but I want to support his notion that this question shouldn't be answered. I'd also find it bad if someone went and answered this question taking 'tajo as some sort of authority.

I think a 'bomb' inherently would make scum feel awkward when it is in their possession, so this extra information is not necessary.

[Empking]

Is Ort right?

[Moratorium]

Is Ort right?

Shouldn't you already know the answer to this?

[AceMarksman]

have we asked emp a question yet?

[ortolan]

@Whomever- how would you like me to explain? Sometimes, the little hairs on the back of my nect stand up when I read something. And considering that ortolan hasn't posted any porn, he's my vote at present.

Yer that's definitely lynch-worthy. Gorrad is more obv-scum though, because I haven't played with this guy before.

Ort, how about you answer this question.

Soooo, why do you want me to answer a second question now (especially as obviously an anti-town one as that)?

[Empking]

Is Ort right?

Shouldn't you already know the answer to this?

No. I don't have the item descriptions.

[caf19]

two

That's not what I make it. Either you are scum or misunderstood the question, which is possible because it is slightly open to interpretation. Perhaps this will help: Is the poison shroom one of the 'two' in your answer?

[Shadow Knight]

*twiddling thumbs*

Look guys, just have me prodded once those of us without item descriptions can post without getting jumped on, k?

[populartajo]

Anybody ask ortolan other question since Im obviously biased towards him.

[Moratorium]

two

That's not what I make it. Either you are scum or misunderstood the question, which is possible because it is slightly open to interpretation. Perhaps this will help: Is the poison shroom one of the 'two' in your answer?

[zwetschenwasser]

Is Ort right?

This is why Empking needs death.

[qwints]

*twiddling thumbs*

Look guys, just have me prodded once those of us without item descriptions can post without getting jumped on, k?

confirm vote: Shadow Knight

Are you not even going to try and justify your existence?