Isacc in post 394 wrote:
2) Well, it sure seems to be working predictably. You're all jumping on his bandwagon quite fast, doncha think? Seems like it wasn't such a crazy strategy to pull off.
1) Take a look at MadeofPhail. Starts of wanting to discuss night actions (DING DING DING) and then jumps pretty quick on this wagon.
To adress this matter, I still do not see how discussing night actions is scummy. I may be new, but when it gets down to it, the way I see it is that a night action is an action nonetheless, and thus can be used as evidence, just like any other statements or actions. If the wiki says that discussing night actions is scummy, then I have a generallised statement to apply to that: The wiki is a written, generalised statement. I have never found a written suggestion to be completely infallible. Furthermore, it is a reference piece of literature, not a manual.
As for jumping pretty quickly on the wagon: If that is your only rebuttal, then I am afraid that you are not doing a very good job. I'm not wagoning, I stated my reasons, and I think that maybe to make this clearer I will elaborate.
I think Issac is scum because my conclusions have been:
1). BB isn't lying. I'm pretty sure for a few reasons.
a). he specifically calls out a specific person, scum don't try to get a mislynch so specifically (at least not in my experience).
I).This is because they will nightkill strong players who will not be mislynched easily. After reading the flavor, it does make it clearer that magnus was the mafia kill, and this matter proves this point. Mafia don't care who gets mislynched, as long as somebody does. Mafia generally don't press incredibly hard on someone's lynch.
b). He claims in rebuttal, instead of just trying to undermine the claim of BB.
II).A pro-town power role claiming in Day 2 is really suspscious if it is unprovoked. It looks like they are just trying to gain immunity early in the game. But Isacc defend himself with a
claim
. This seems to suggest that even he aknowledges that BB is really the power role watcher, and that he scrambles to think of a semi-likely explanation to defend himself. But Isacc goes on to believe that He is scum, even though he practically aknowledged that BB is the watcher.
---------------------------------------------
But just for the sake of argument, lets present ourselves with the hypothetical situation of Isacc telling the truth. In which case I have a question:
Why would he investigate BB in the first place? What makes BB seem like a likely scum candidate worthy of being watched?
