ZazieR - 1 (Debonair Danny DiPietro)
Empking - 1 (Spolium)
Spolium - 1 (Empking)
Wall-E
ZazieR
mykonian
caf19
With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch!
Deadline is May 4th at midnight EST.
As I said before, I don't agree that the mod changed his policy.Empking wrote:How can you explain the mod changing his policy?
This is a terrible excuse not to back up your allegation, and as clear a sign as any that youEmpking wrote:In this game you can't prove things if the other player doesn't have an open mind and you don't.
You decreased your own credibility when you lied to further your "case".Empking wrote:Oh yeah, I'm suspicious of you so you attack an insult me in order to decrease my credibility, wow.
I think someone is suspicious when he aggressively attacks someone that has very little against him, only something mod-related. He just saw a reason to go for Spolium, and now he is continiously trying to get that mislynch.Wall-E wrote:I think that Empking's no different than he normally is, meaning I have no idea what his alignment is. Your recent exchange didn't sell me on Empking being scum. It strikes me that a better defense on your part may have been to simply ignore his "reasoning" and his vote considering how obviously flawed the logic was, but I realize you were attacking rather than defending, in which case I'm null-minded on the whole ordeal.
The majority of my case is based on Empking's "the mod is lying" approach. How could I have built it before he started pushing that angle?Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Given that I find it a touch curious that Spolium only builds his Empking case when he himself was the target of attack.
From my own POV, at the time I was more concerned about you being scum (that's how my read on you was leaning).DDD wrote:When Empking was pushing similarly one dimenionsal arguments about me, everyone seemed content to let it happen and wrote it off as playstyle to a large degree.
?[/quote]caf19 wrote:My opinion on Empking: I don't really buy his case on Spolium. A bit of mod confusion is not enough to indicate scum, imo. And he appears to be reaffirming his case through the fact that Spolium is arguing against it - well, he's obviously going to disagree, isn't he?
TimmaaaaaHEmpking wrote:There's a difference between disagreeing and just deciding to insult and chainsaw defend yourself.
What? Someone hammer this scum.Empking wrote:I'm Chef. Role-blocking, aesthetic, aesthetic maker. I do this be making sweet-loving to the player I target.
Sure, but the real reason behind that is Empking pushing falsehoods as truth and as a reason for voting. Which, while more egregious in this case than my own this isn't his first go around with such behavior in this game.Spolium wrote:The majority of my case is based on Empking's "the mod is lying" approach. How could I have built it before he started pushing that angle?Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Given that I find it a touch curious that Spolium only builds his Empking case when he himself was the target of attack.
Doesn't reflect well on you, if you're so locked into one individual that you're missing suspect behavior from others.From my own POV, at the time I was more concerned about you being scum (that's how my read on you was leaning).DDD wrote:When Empking was pushing similarly one dimenionsal arguments about me, everyone seemed content to let it happen and wrote it off as playstyle to a large degree.
In "The Return Of Chef" he's brainwashed to make love to children, so it's possible. If this is the flavour, however, I might expect him to be an evil character.ZazieR wrote:Power roles don't know why they can perform their action, and making sweet-loving towards children?! How can anyone believe this claim?
This.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:While I consider the claim, Empking who did you target last night?