Hello friends.
I shall refrain from any "I told you sos" at this stage.
Gorrad still looks like a good target to me. His 858 is perfectly consistent with being a last minute bus. Starting today by voting a "jumped in" player is also interesting when the mechanic was made clear before the game even started- what is intrinsically scummy about jumping in?
sirdanilot would do well to answer his question however.
tajo, now as I said yesterday tajo did tell us he had a "gut belief" in SK's claim which didn't seem to have much basis. And as I pointed out in 864, his justification for believing the claim was contradictory. Plus he tried to redirect votes to another wagon, Looker's, solely on the basis of "lurking", which is a very weak justification for a day one wagon, especially when one compares it to the now flipped-scum SK wagon. That said I do not think he is scummy alone for the suggestion of mass-claiming. I also don't think I've seen him as scum before which makes reading him all the more difficult.
I note he is again voting Looker for lurking.
tajo (902) wrote:Can you explain why did you find out ortolan very rational?
No comment.
906- Gorrad still being very aggressive toward sirdanilot.
Gorrad (908) wrote:Or hey, how about the fact that Castle folks win when all three non-Castle groups are dead? AKA three anti-town factions. AKA more than one anti-town NK.
Now be quiet, commenting on NKs is scummy. I'd vote for you if I wasn't voting for Sirdanilot. Backing up this is Bleach Mafia with Seraphim as well as Random Mafia 3 with UROE.
Is it just me or are all of Gorrad's reasons for attacking people really weak? Especially Moratorium, probably the most pro-town player in this game so far. Why exactly is it scummy to speculate on night-kills exactly, especially, when, as you say, we're trying to work out how the apparent two extra factions fit into the game?
WeyounsLastClone (912) wrote:
That said, maybe quints actually was Bowser's Army, but a special power made him look like Mushroom Kingdom (although his after death reaction would be a bit strange in that regard). It would also explain why qwints could answer an item question.
Errrrrr......? And you think this is plausible why exactly?
Gorrad (918) wrote:The first one had Seraphim-scum lynched, the second had UROE-scum lynched. Both cases started with nightkill commentary, and in both games the scumminess of nightkill-commentary was brought up by yours truely. What does speculation gain? Nothing. What can it lose? An outted doctor.
This argument is invalid. A sample size of two does not a scum-tell make. Furthermore we have entirely different circumstances. Contrary to expectations, we had one scum die night one, with no other deaths. We are also trying to work out where the other two apparent factions fit in the game. How can you scum-hunt without some speculation about how many scum factions/killing-roles there are. And how exactly do you foresee Moratorium speculating about the setup being likely to out a doctor?
semioldguy can you explain what 925 means in practice for those of us not well acquainted with the first game.
Gorrad (954) wrote:You did it, you were town. UROE and Seraphim did it, they were scum. 2/3 is still a trend.
STATISTICS FAIL
tajo (967) wrote:My scumhunting powers say that Looker and ortolan should be the next people dying in this game.
LOL. I know I've never seen you as scum but this is so dumb it's worth lynching you for alone.
See, yesterday, while you were voting me for opposing a mass-claim plan as being useless which has since turned out to be...useless, I was busy catching scum. At the last minute, you tried to redirect from the scum's wagon, to someone else's (Looker), on the sole basis of "lurking". Additionally your reasoning for believing the scum's claim was contradictory (it was both too simple to be a fake-claim, and later too in-depth).
And your rationale for wanting me lynched today, apart from being incredibly pro-town, is???
Vote: poptajo
I'll leave Gorrad alone until sirdanilot answers his questions.